Gelaspan vs Crystalloid Therapy in Sepsis

Study Background Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by a dysregulated host response to severe infection, which can rapidly progress to septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction, and death.Despite advances in recognition and treatment in recent years, sepsis remains a major global health challenge, with overall mortality rates still ranging from 18% to 30%.Pathophysiologically, sepsis is characterized by increased capillary permeability and vasodilation, resulting in substantial fluid extravasation into the interstitial space, tissue edema, and intravascular volume depletion. These changes lead to inadequate tissue perfusion, impaired oxygen delivery, and ultimately organ dysfunction. Therefore, timely and appropriate fluid resuscitation remains one of the most fundamental and essential components of sepsis management. Individualized, goal-directed fluid therapy aims to improve systemic perfusion while minimizing the risks associated with fluid overload.

In 2001, Rivers et al. introduced the concept of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT), demonstrating significant mortality reduction (30.5% vs 45%) in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.This finding prompted widespread adoption of early aggressive fluid resuscitation. However, three large multicenter trials published between 2014 and 2015 (ARISE, ProCESS, and ProMISe) later found no significant mortality differences between EGDT and usual care (approximately 18-25%).These results suggested that with improvements in routine clinical practice, contemporary usual care may already include adequate hemodynamic optimization.

Based on this evidence, the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines recommended administration of at least 30 mL/kg of crystalloid fluid within the first 3 hours for patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion, followed by hemodynamic-guided adjustment.Because many participants in these large trials had already received similar volumes before randomization, this dosage became associated with favorable outcomes. The 2021 SSC guideline retained this recommendation, though downgraded from a "strong" to a "weak" recommendation in the absence of new high-quality evidence.This highlights persistent uncertainty and the need for further research on optimal fluid type and strategy in sepsis resuscitation.

Increasing attention has been paid to microcirculation in recent years. While macrocirculatory parameters such as blood pressure may normalize after resuscitation, this does not necessarily indicate restoration of tissue-level perfusion.Persistent microcirculatory dysfunction may contribute to inadequate oxygen delivery and delayed organ recovery. Understanding how different fluid therapies influence both macro- and microcirculation is therefore crucial for optimizing outcomes.

Currently used resuscitation fluids include crystalloids and colloids. Crystalloids rapidly redistribute into the interstitial space and may exacerbate tissue edema-particularly in sepsis where capillary permeability is increased-potentially impairing microcirculatory flow.Colloids contain larger molecules that remain intravascular for longer periods, generating oncotic pressure and maintaining circulating volume more effectively, which may theoretically support microcirculatory perfusion and oxygen delivery. Clinically used colloids include albumin, hydroxyethyl starch (HES), and gelatin. Albumin is effective but costly and limited in availability. HES has fallen out of favor due to its association with kidney injury and increased mortality in sepsis.Gelatin, derived from bovine collagen hydrolysates, is now the only artificial colloid still recommended by guidelines for hypovolemia in sepsis patients.Nevertheless, high-quality randomized controlled evidence comparing gelatin with crystalloids in sepsis remains insufficient.

Based on this background, the present study focuses on balanced gelatin solution-a compound solution containing 4% succinylated gelatin in a balanced crystalloid carrier. We hypothesize that, compared with balanced crystalloid alone, balanced gelatin may better support hemodynamic stability through its colloid osmotic effect, more effectively correct fluid imbalance, improve microcirculatory perfusion, promote organ function recovery, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. This randomized controlled trial is designed to rigorously test this hypothesis.

Patient and Public Involvement (PPIE)

During the protocol development stage, this study incorporated Patient and Public Involvement (PPIE). Three public contributors without medical backgrounds were invited to review the full protocol and informed consent form prior to study initiation. They provided feedback from the perspective of typical patients and family members. The main areas of concern included:

* The need for more accessible and patient-friendly language when describing the study background and objectives. * Difficulty understanding the double-blind design, with recommendations to use analogies or simplified explanations. * High concern regarding safety issues, including allergic reactions, kidney injury, and fluid-related adverse events, and a desire for clear descriptions of emergency procedures and contact information. * Interest in treatment stability, postoperative supportive care needs, long-term complications, and follow-up arrangements. * Questions regarding treatment-related costs, the exploratory nature of the intervention, and whether future protocol optimization is planned. * Expectation that overall study results will be shared with participants after study completion.

Based on this feedback, the research team has revised and optimized the protocol background, the explanation of "double-blind" in the informed consent form, the safety management procedures, the follow-up plan, and the approach for disseminating study results. These adjustments aim to enhance the clarity, acceptability, and overall engagement of patient participants.

Study Objectives Primary Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of balanced gelatin solution in perioperative fluid management for septic patients undergoing emergency non-cardiac surgery, with emphasis on:reducing perioperative positive fluid balance；promoting hemodynamic stability；improving microcirculatory perfusion；and supporting organ function recovery and clinical outcomes.

Secondary Objective To assess the safety of balanced gelatin solution in this population, focusing on its effects on kidney function, coagulation status, and common postoperative complications.

Study Design This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial with an adaptive design incorporating sample size re-estimation. An initial sample size of 318 patients (159 per group) will be recruited, with an interim analysis after enrollment of 50% of participants to reassess the required sample size. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either balanced gelatin or crystalloid solution (Ringer's acetate). Randomization is stratified by baseline blood lactate level (≤ 4 mmol/L vs \> 4 mmol/L) using a central dynamic allocation system to ensure balance between groups.

Population Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years) with sepsis (per Sepsis-3 criteria) due to abdominal infection requiring emergency surgery. Inclusion requires a SOFA score ≥2 and lactate \>2 mmol/L. Key exclusions include prior colloid use within 24 hours, expected death within 48 hours, advanced heart failure, severe ARDS, pre-existing renal replacement therapy, severe coagulopathy, liver failure, or allergy to gelatin.

Interventions All participants receive standardized anesthesia care. Intraoperative fluid therapy follows a goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocol guided by stroke volume (SV) monitoring. To ensure double-blinding, the study fluid (either balanced gelatin or Ringer's acetate) is prepared by independent, unblinded personnel, remaining masked to clinicians, investigators, and patients. During anesthesia, all patients receive a baseline infusion of Ringer's acetate at 3 mL/kg/h (ideal body weight, IBW). For volume expansion, fluid boluses (3 mL/kg IBW of the assigned study fluid over 5 minutes) are administered; a bolus is repeated if SV increases by \>10%. Postoperatively, the assigned study fluid remains the primary resuscitation fluid for up to 24 hours. The cumulative dose of the study fluid is capped at 30 mL/kg (IBW) within this 24-hour intervention period; if the limit is reached, subsequent resuscitation reverts to Ringer's acetate. Vasoactive or inotropic support is standardized based on predefined hemodynamic triggers after optimizing SV.

Endpoints

Primary endpoints include:

Cumulative fluid balance within 24 hours after surgery. Proportion of patients achieving hemodynamic stability within 24 hours. Secondary endpoints include kidney function, SOFA score dynamics, lactate clearance, need for vasopressors or renal replacement therapy, postoperative complications, ICU and hospital length of stay, and all-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days. Safety endpoints include pulmonary edema, arrhythmias, and acute kidney injury.

Follow-up Patients will be followed during hospitalization and by structured telephone interviews at day 28 and day 90. Follow-up assessments include survival, complications, and health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

Blinding and Oversight The study is double-blind: patients, treating clinicians, outcome assessors, and statisticians remain unaware of group allocation. Randomization and drug packaging are handled by independent, unblinded coordinators under the supervision of independent witnesses to ensure masking integrity. Strict role isolation is maintained, ensuring that any personnel with access to allocation information are prohibited from participating in subject recruitment, clinical intervention, follow-up, or data analysis. Emergency unblinding is permitted only for patient safety. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will oversee trial conduct, perform interim analyses for the adaptive design, and review adverse events.

Statistical Note:

A fixed-sequence hierarchical testing procedure will be applied to the primary endpoints to maintain the overall family-wise type I error rate at 0.05. Primary endpoint 1 (24-hour cumulative fluid balance) will be tested first; primary endpoint 2 (hemodynamic stability) will only be formally tested for statistical significance if the first endpoint reaches p \< 0.05.

Significance By directly comparing balanced gelatin with crystalloids in septic patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, this trial will provide critical evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of gelatin-based fluid resuscitation. Results are expected to inform perioperative fluid management strategies and contribute to guideline development in the management of sepsis.

• Secondary Outcome 1.1: Intensity of study drug use within 24 hours after surgery [Срок оценки: Randomization to postoperative 24 hours]
• Secondary Outcome 1.2: Blood product utilization rate within 24 hours after surgery [Срок оценки: Randomization to postoperative 24 hours]
• Secondary Outcome 1.3: Vasopressor load within 24 hours after surgery [Срок оценки: Randomization to postoperative 24 hours]
• Secondary Outcome 1.4: Proportion of patients receiving inotropic drugs within 24 hours after surgery [Срок оценки: Randomization to postoperative 24 hours]
• Secondary Outcome 2.1: Intraoperative lactate reduction magnitude [Срок оценки: Baseline to end of surgery]
• Secondary Outcome 2.2: 24-hour lactate reduction magnitude [Срок оценки: Baseline to postoperative 24 hours]
• Secondary Outcome 2.3: Normalization rate of capillary refill time (CRT) at end of surgery [Срок оценки: From baseline to end of surgery]
• Secondary Outcome 3.1: Proportion of patients with decrease in SOFA score at postoperative day 3 compared with baseline [Срок оценки: Baseline (preoperative) to postoperative day 3]
• Secondary Outcome 3.2: Proportion of patients with severe organ dysfunction within 3 days after surgery [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 1 to day 3]
• Secondary Outcome 3.3: Incidence of acute kidney injury within 3 days after surgery [Срок оценки: Baseline to postoperative day 3]
• Secondary Outcome 3.4: Cumulative duration of renal replacement therapy within 28 days after surgery [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 1 to day 28]
• Secondary Outcome 3.5: Incidence of coagulopathy within 3 days after surgery [Срок оценки: Baseline to postoperative day 3]