Меню
Идёт набор NCT07163091

Bracing After Ankle Fracture

Без фазы С лечением Ankle Fracture Rehabilitation Recovery

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: ankel stirrup, Foot-ankel brace (walker).
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Ankle Fracture, Rehabilitation, Recovery. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Дания, Faroe Islands
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Bracing After Ankle Fracture (BAF): a Randomised Multicenter Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Ankle Stirrups to Walkers on Pain, Function and Social Interaction for Adults After Ankle Fracture - Study Protocol

Обзор

Ankle fractures are common, debilitating and usually treated with immobilisation using a foot-ankle brace (walker). Emerging evidence suggests that a less restrictive brace may reduce recovery time without increasing the risk of complications, and patients tend to prefer ankle stirrups. However, evidence supporting their non-inferiority remains limited and inconclusive. Thus, the aim is assess if an ankle stirrup is non-inferior to a standard walker in reducing pain and function measured by the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) three months after ankle fracture. The hypothesis is that ankel stirrups align better with patients preferenes for less immobilising braces and offer sufficient stability while the fracture heals. Secondarily it may lead to faster recovery of function, return to work and reduced cost. The sample size of a maximum of 1400 patients allow us to assess non-inferiority in age and sex specific subgroups and treatment (surgical or non-sugical). Non-inferiority will be assessed in a pragmatic, multicenter, randomised controlled trial involving Scandinavian orthopedic departments.

Подробное описание

Ankle fractures are the third most occuring fracture. After an ankle fracture, patients experience reduced ankle function and pain \[3\]. Also, evidence with moderate to high risk of bias indicate that immobilisation prolong patients recovery. However, high quality evidence are necessary for finite conclusions.

In Scandinavia, foot-ankle braces (walkers) are used to immobilise the fracture while healing. Even though patients acknowledge the need for immobilisation, a qualitative study of ten patients found that patients experienced difficulties in adhering to the recommendation of immobilisation after ankle fracture. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) by Smeeing et al. 2020 found that braces and elastic bands that allow more ankle movement than walkers did not lead to poorer functional outcomes (p=0.56), but may lead to a faster return to work (p = 0.02) without increased complications (p=0.63). The RCT was terminated when half the sample had been included, thus questioning the statistical power of the findings. Based on patient interviews completed during trial preparations we learned that patients preferred ankle stirrups as they allowed movement during use. The same patients also expressed an aversion to the walker, while being hesitant that ankle-supporting elastic bandages provided sufficient support.

Compared to the walker, ankle stirrups may better align with patient preferences while remaining non-inferior in restoring ankle-related outcomes such as pain and function.

Patients will be included in the orthopedic outpatient departments and randomised to a walker or an ankle stirrup. Randomisation will be in blocks to ensure that surgically and non-surgically patients are evenly distributed between groups and that each center will have an equal amount of intervention and control patients. Weightbearing will be unrestricted in both groups so the difference will be the brace (ankel stirrup or walker). Other variation will be a reflection of usual practice. The primary outcome is a validated score including pain, function and social interaction 12 weeks after ankel fracture. The sample size is calculated to 140 patients per each of six subgroups (males 18-39, females 18-39, males 40-59, females 40-59, males 60+, females 60+) randomisation stop when the smallest subgroup (females 18-39 years) reaches 140 or a maximum of 1400 has been included. Patients have been involved in designing the trial and a former ankle fracture patient serves a member of the steering committee.

Вмешательства

  • Другое ankel stirrup
    Ankel stirrups are a patient preferred ankel brace that allow active ankle dorsal and plantar flexion during weightbearing while maintaining lateral stability.
  • Другое Foot-ankel brace (walker)
    Walkers immobilise and stabilise the ankle during weightbearing.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Index score (0-100) of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) [Срок оценки: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
Вторичные конечные точки (8)
  • Physical activity [Срок оценки: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
  • Health-related Quality Of Life (HRQOL) [Срок оценки: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
  • Ankle dorsiflexion [Срок оценки: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
  • Ankle strength [Срок оценки: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
  • Hospital costs [Срок оценки: Measured as the total cost from baseline and after 12 weeks]
  • Return to work [Срок оценки: From fracture and until date of return to work.]
  • Index score (0-100) of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in subgroups [Срок оценки: Measured as the change from baseline after 6 and 12 weeks.]
  • Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) [Срок оценки: Safety reporting for each patient will begin at baseline and after 6 and twelve weeks]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • 18 years or older
  • Surgically or non-surgically treated ankle fracture

Критерии исключения

  • Pathological fractures
  • Inadequacy to read or speak danish
  • Open fractures
  • Prolonged need for immobilisation (e.g. non-union or insufficient wound healing)
  • Inability to adhere to trial procedures (e.g. neuropathy or severe psychiatric disorder)
  • Restricted weightbearing
  • Uninterest in participating

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Простое слепое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

Дания · 15 центров
  • Orthopedic Department, Hospital of Southern Jutland — Aabenraa
  • Orthopedic Department, Aalborg Universitets Hospital — Aalborg
  • Orthopedic Department, Aarhus University Hospital — Aarhus
  • Orthopedic Department, Bispebjerg Hospital — Copenhagen
  • Orthopedic Department, Hospital of South West Jutland — Esbjerg
  • Orthopedic Department, Herlev Hospital — Herlev
  • Orthopedic Department, North Zealand Hospital — Hillerød
  • Orthopedic Department, Hvidovre Hospital — Hvidovre
  • … и ещё 7 центров
Faroe Islands · 1 центр
  • Surgical Centre, National Hospital of the Faroe Islands — Tórshavn

Публикации

  • Ipsen JA, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Abrahamsen C, Gundtoft PH, Costa M, Mikkelsen SS, Hrobjartsson A, Viberg B. A study protocol for a randomised trial of bracing after ankle fracture. Dan Med J. 2026 Mar 19;73(4):A09250748. doi: 10.61409/A09250748. PMID 41978451

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07163091 · OP_2497/OT_0001 · 10.46540/4308-00191B

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗