Меню
Идёт набор NCT07154043

Comparison of IPC Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to MLD Within CDT for BCRL

Без фазы С лечением Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema BCRL

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT), CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC), CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, BCRL. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 65 лет · Женщины.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Turkey (Türkiye)
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Comparison of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to Manual Lymphatic Drainage Within Complete Decongestive Therapy for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Обзор

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and lymphedema is one of its most significant complications. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) may develop shortly after treatment or even years later, causing physical and psychological burden, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise, is the standard approach. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has been proposed as an additional option, and current consensus reports emphasize the need for studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD. Previous studies comparing IPC and MLD, either alone or in combination, have shown inconsistent results. Some reported no significant difference between treatment groups, while others suggested additional benefits of IPC, particularly in reducing limb heaviness and tension. However, there is still insufficient evidence to clarify the exact role of IPC within CDT. The aim of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

Подробное описание

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most important complications of breast cancer treatment. It may occur due to lymphatic system damage caused by surgery and/or radiotherapy, or as a result of tumor-related lymphangiogenesis, leading to interstitial fluid accumulation. BCRL can develop immediately after treatment or months to years later.

BCRL is associated with swelling, heaviness, discomfort, weakness, increased risk of infection, and progressive chronicity, which together result in upper extremity dysfunction and reduced quality of life. Compared with women without lymphedema, patients with BCRL report more frequent pain, decreased shoulder mobility, reduced upper extremity strength, impaired daily activities, and sensory disturbances.

The standard treatment for BCRL is complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which consists of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has also been proposed as a treatment option, and the 2023 consensus report of the International Society of Lymphology emphasized the need for further studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.

However, the number of studies directly comparing IPC with MLD, or evaluating their combined use, is limited and results remain inconsistent. Some trials reported no significant difference between MLD and IPC in terms of limb volume reduction, while others demonstrated additional benefits of IPC in relieving heaviness and tension. The role of IPC in CDT, whether as a replacement for MLD or as an adjunct, is not yet clearly defined.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, within CDT on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

Вмешательства

  • Процедура Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)
    Manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.
  • Процедура CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)
    Complete decongestive therapy program including manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, plus intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.
  • Процедура CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
    Complete decongestive therapy consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, with manual lymph drainage replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Arm volumetric measurements [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
Вторичные конечные точки (10)
  • Shoulder Range of Motion [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Quality of Life Measurement ULL-27 [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Arm Circumference Measurements [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) Questionnaire [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Upper Extremity Swelling (Visual Analog Scale) [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Upper Extremity Heaviness (Visual Analog Scale) [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Upper Extremity Tightness (Visual Analog Scale) [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Upper Extremity Pain (Visual Analog Scale) [Срок оценки: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Patient Satisfaction [Срок оценки: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]
  • Perceived Improvement [Срок оценки: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Female gender
  • Patients aged 18-65 years
  • Having a history of unilateral mastectomy and lymph node dissection at least one year ago due to breast cancer diagnosis.
  • Having unilateral breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema (>20% volume difference between the two upper extremities or >2 cm difference in circumference at any measured point) according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Society of Lymphology (Committee 2023) for at least six months.
  • Not having received lymphedema treatment or exercise therapy for the last six months
  • Completing breast cancer primary treatment at least 6 months ago (except hormone therapy/aromatase inhibitors)

Критерии исключения

  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Bilateral axillary lymph node dissection
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Receiving ongoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Primary or bilateral lymphedema
  • Having active cancer
  • Presence of stage 3 lymphedema
  • Uncontrolled serious systemic disease (cardiopulmonary diseases, arterial or venous diseases, renal dysfunction, uncontrolled hypertension or hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, scleroderma, Sudek's atrophy).
  • Current or recent (within the last 3 months) infection (cellulitis, lymphangitis) or deep venous thrombosis
  • Presence of open wounds
  • Using medications that may affect body fluid and electrolyte balance (diuretics, etc.).
  • Individuals with serious mental and sensory problems
  • Being pregnant
  • Body mass index >40 kg/m2

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Тройное слепое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 центр
  • Pamukkale University — Denizli

Публикации

  • Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44. PMID 16709254
  • LeBlanc M, Stineman M, DeMichele A, Stricker C, Mao JJ. Validation of QuickDASH outcome measure in breast cancer survivors for upper extremity disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 2. PMID 24095658
  • Koldas Dogan S, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1470-y. Epub 2010 Apr 22. PMID 20411289
  • Sitzia J. Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1995 Mar;4(1):11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00047.x. PMID 7620649
  • Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther. 2003 Feb;83(2):134-45. PMID 12564949
  • Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020;53(1):3-19. PMID 32521126
  • De Vrieze T, Gebruers N, Tjalma WA, Nevelsteen I, Thomis S, De Groef A, Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Belgrado JP, Vandermeeren L, Devoogdt N. What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1221-1232. doi: 10.11 PMID 30880473
  • Keeley V, Riches K, Ward L, Franks PJ. A Prospective Preliminary Study Examining the Physiological Impact of Pneumatic Compression Dosing in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Oct;21(5):456-462. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0087. Epub 2023 May 4. PMID 37140559

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07154043 · PamukkaleU.ftr-OTopuz-001

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗