Hall Technique vs Conventional Technique in Permanent Teeth

Официальное название

Comparison of Hall Technique vs Conventional Technique in Permanent Teeth

Обзор

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological performance of stainless steel crowns using conventional and Hall technique on permanent molars

Подробное описание

Stainless Steel Crowns will be applied on two permanent molar teeth in a split mouth design. 96 patients will be included in the study. The teeth will be randomized into two groups according to the applying methods: 1) Traditional method 2) Hall technique.

Oral hygiene index (Green \& Vermillion), Plaque index (Sillness \& Löe), gingival health (Löe \& Sillness), level of gingival margin, crown retention and success, wear, occlusion, clinical pulpal health (spontaneous pain, mucosal swelling/fistula presence, mobility, percussion/palpation tenderness) and radiographic pulpal health (periradicular/interradicular radiolucency, lamina dura loss, internal/external root resorption, pulp canal obliteration) will be evaluated and photographic records will be taken.

The evaluation of the restorations will be performed at baseline, and 1., 3., 6., 12., 18., 24. months. The measurement of vertical hight on occlusion will be performed before and immediate after the treatment, at 2 weeks and 1., 2. and 3.months.

Fisher's Exact test, Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves, Log-rank test, Mann Whitney U test, and Friedman test will be performed for the statistical analysis.

Вмешательства

• Другое SSC crown with Hall technique
  SSC crown placement using Hall technique
• Другое SSC with conventional technique
  SSC placement using conventional technique

Первичные конечные точки

• Clinical and radiological performance of SSCs placed with Hall of conventional technique [Срок оценки: 2 years]

Вторичные конечные точки (1)

• Clinical measurements of SSCs placed with Hall of conventional technique [Срок оценки: 2 years]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

• The child volunteers and their parents who read and agreed to the informed consent form.
• The presence of excessive loss of material or extensive enamel defects in at least two permanent molars that require crown application.
• The presence of antagonist teeth of the teeth to be crowned.
• All treatments on the patient's other teeth have been completed.
• The patient who does not have temporomandibular joint (TMJ) problems.
• Children who have cooperation to allow the dental procedure to be completed.

Критерии исключения

• Child volunteers or parents who refuse to participate in the study.
• The patient who has a chronic disease.
• Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment
• The patient has missing teeth on the treated side.
• The need for vital or non-vital pulp treatment of the tooth.
• The child volunteers and their parents did not accept the aesthetic appearance of the stainless steel crown.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Рандомизированное

Модель

Перекрёстный дизайн

Маскирование

Открытое

Основная цель

Лечение

Центры проведения

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 центр

• Hacettepe university, pediatric dentistry — Ankara

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07100028 · Hall technique-permanent

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗