The Effect of Distal Versus Proximal iPACK on Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures in modern medicine. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, postoperative pain management remains a significant challenge and a key factor influencing time to mobilization, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. Commonly used analgesic techniques, such as femoral nerve blocks or epidural analgesia, while effective, can impair motor function and thus delay rehabilitation.

To minimize motor deficits while still providing effective pain relief, newer regional anesthesia techniques have been introduced into clinical practice. One such technique is the iPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee), which targets the posterior knee - an area often insufficiently covered by conventional nerve blocks. This method involves administering a local anesthetic into the space between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee joint, offering analgesia without significant motor impairment.

Originally, the iPACK block was described as being performed at the level of the distal femoral shaft, several centimeters above the femoral condyles. Recently, however, a more distal variation of the technique has emerged, where the anesthetic is injected directly between the femoral condyles. This may provide more effective coverage of the posterior knee capsule's innervation. To date, there are no randomized trials that directly compare the efficacy of the distal and proximal iPACK approaches in terms of postoperative pain as the primary outcome.

Our aim is to conduct a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of the distal and proximal iPACK blocks in patients undergoing TKA. A total of 120 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups.

* In the proximal iPACK group, participants will receive 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine with adrenaline (1:200,000), injected at the level of the distal femoral shaft (a straight portion of the femur without the condyles). * In the distal iPACK group, the same volume and concentration of anesthetic will be injected at the most distal part of the thigh, between the femoral condyles.

All participants, regardless of group assignment, will also receive an adductor canal block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine without adrenaline. In addition, all patients will receive standard analgesic therapy consisting of paracetamol (1 g IV every 8 hours) and diclofenac (75 mg IV every 12 hours). If necessary, rescue opioid doses will be available according to individual needs.

The efficacy of each approach will be assessed using several parameters: total opioid consumption within 24 hours and time to first opioid rescue dose, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both at rest and during active knee movement (up to 45 degrees) at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.

The hypothesis of our study is that the distal iPACK approach will provide more effective postoperative pain control compared to the original proximal technique. If confirmed, the findings could influence perioperative pain management protocols for TKA, support the broader adoption of the distal iPACK block in clinical practice, enhance patient comfort, reduce opioid use, promote earlier mobilization, and potentially shorten hospital stays.

• time to first opioid administration [Срок оценки: up to 24 hours after surgery]
• Visual analog scale 6 (rest) [Срок оценки: 6 hours postoperatively]
• Visual analog scale 12 (rest) [Срок оценки: 12 hours postoperatively]
• Visual analog scale 24 (rest) [Срок оценки: 24 hours postoperatively]
• Visual analog scale 6 (flexion) [Срок оценки: 6 hours postoperatively]
• Visual analog scale 12 (flexion) [Срок оценки: 12 hours postoperatively]
• Visual analog scale 24 (flexion) [Срок оценки: 24 hours postoperatively]