Comparison of Intensive Versus Standard Care & Education for Dyslipidemia in Hypertension and Diabetes Patients

1. Necessity of Dyslipidemia Management Education for Patients with Hypertension and Diabetes :

The prevalence of dyslipidemia is high among patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, making it a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Previous studies have demonstrated that intensive dyslipidemia management plays a crucial role in preventing cardiovascular events. However, the level of education and management provided in primary healthcare settings remains unstandardized, and there is a lack of research validating the effectiveness of structured intensive management programs.

Enhancing education on dyslipidemia is not merely a therapeutic intervention but a preventive measure that can contribute to long-term health improvements in patients. Lifestyle modifications reinforced through intensive education serve as a complementary approach to pharmacological treatment, ultimately reducing healthcare costs and enabling the efficient allocation of medical resources. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intensive dyslipidemia management and education for patients with hypertension and diabetes, providing evidence-based treatment strategies. 2. Objectives and Expected Outcomes :

The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact of intensive dyslipidemia education on improving blood lipid profiles in patients with hypertension and diabetes. Through this evaluation, the study seeks to contribute to the establishment of a more structured and standardized dyslipidemia management model within the existing chronic disease management system in Korea.

Additionally, this study aims to analyze the cost-benefit effect of enhanced education and examine its influence on reducing healthcare expenditures and improving long-term patient health management. Notably, dyslipidemia education has high feasibility for implementation in primary healthcare institutions and public health centers without requiring additional infrastructure, making it a highly practical intervention.

Furthermore, standardizing educational content alone is expected to yield positive effects on patient management, serving as a critical reference for future public health policy development. The findings of this study are anticipated to contribute to the revision of national dyslipidemia management guidelines and policymaking while enhancing the effectiveness of chronic disease management initiatives led by health authorities.

• Change from Baseline in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure at 6 months [Срок оценки: at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6 months (after the intervention)]
• Change from Baseline in HbA1c level at 6 months [Срок оценки: at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6 months (after the intervention)]
• Change from Baseline in Quality of Life assessed by SF-36 at 6 months [Срок оценки: at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6 months]
• Change from Baseline in structured questionnaire assessing lifestyle (Physical activity, Dietary habits, Alcohol consumption, Smoking status) [Срок оценки: at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6 months]