Меню
Идёт набор NCT07027306

The Osteoporotic Fracture Classification-based Scoring System for Treatment Decision in Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Fractures

Наблюдательное Osteoporotic Fractures Osteoporosis

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws).
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Osteoporotic Fractures, Osteoporosis. Базовые параметры: от 50 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
США, Аргентина, Бразилия, Чили, Египет +9
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

The Osteoporotic Fracture Classification-based Scoring System for Treatment Decision in Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Fractures: An International Multicenter Prospective Study

Обзор

This is an international multicenter prospective observational study. Patients with radiologically confirmed, symptomatic, single- or multilevel contiguous TL (from T1 to L5) fractures as a result of primary osteoporosis will be recruited from participating clinics/hospitals (ie, study sites). Fractures included are insufficiency fractures (confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) and traumatic fractures (low-energy trauma, confirmed by computed tomography \[CT\] or MRI).

Подробное описание

This is an international multicenter prospective observational study. Postmenopausal women ≥ 50 years old and men \> 60 years old with radiologically confirmed, symptomatic, single- or multilevel contiguous TL (from T1 to L5) fractures as a result of primary osteoporosis will be recruited from participating clinics/hospitals (ie, study sites). Fractures included are insufficiency fractures (confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) and traumatic fractures (low-energy trauma, confirmed by computed tomography \[CT\] or MRI).

All osteoporotic TL fractures will be classified using the OF classification system (OF 1 to OF 5). Only the most severe fracture will be used to calculate the OF score. The OF score will be subsequently calculated to aid the surgeons' decision making on the initial treatment plan, which is categorized as either nonsurgical or surgical treatment.

To address the primary study objective, depending on whether the treating surgeons' eventual initial treatment decisions agree with the OF score recommendations, patients will be divided into two groups: 1) patients whose initial treatment is in accordance with the OF score recommendations (the Accordance group), and 2) patients whose initial treatment is in discordance with the OF score recommendations (the Discordance group). Accordance refers to 1) when the OF score is \> 6, surgical treatment is prescribed by the treating surgeons, 2) when the OF score is \< 6, nonsurgical treatment only is prescribed by the treating surgeons, and 3) when the OF score is 6, either surgical or nonsurgical treatment is prescribed (Note: any surgeons' decision is deemed in accordance with the OF score as the system leaves the decision to the surgeons' discretion in this situation).

Accordance/Discordance group assignment is based on the agreement/discrepancy between the eventual treatment and the recommendations from the OF score that is obtained up to Day 0, although OF scores may be calculated at follow-ups (FUs) for subsequent treatment decision making (eg, whether the treatment plan needs to be modified).

Depending on the actual initial treatment assigned to the patients by the treating surgeons, patients will be divided into two groups: 1) patients assigned to receive nonsurgical treatment (the Nonsurgical group), and 2) patients assigned to receive surgery (the Surgical group).

Day 0 refers to the day when the initial treatment is decided and starts (categorized as nonsurgical or surgical treatment). Subsequent FUs will be calculated in reference to Day 0. Patients will be followed up clinically at discharge, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

The primary outcome of the study is the return to the mobility level before the injury or symptom onset (as reported by the patient). The FU period for the primary endpoint of the study is 3 months (short-term), and 12 months for the secondary endpoints (long-term).

Вмешательства

  • Процедура Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws)
    * Any other type of solely vertebral augmentation (stents, etc.), specify * Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) * Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty * Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation * Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation and kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty * Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with vertebral osteotomy (pedicle subtraction osteotomy or similar) * Combined posterior and anterio

Первичные конечные точки

  • Return to mobility [Срок оценки: From day of treatment to the end of the first 3 months after treatment.]
Вторичные конечные точки (12)
  • Comparison of return to mobility (categorical scale) [Срок оценки: At all predefined visits from discharge to 12months post treatment]
  • Comparison of the extent of return to mobility [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of clinical outcome [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of the proportion return to mobility [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of Timed Up & Go test [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of daily activities [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of pain NRS (Numeric Rate Scale) [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of quality of live [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of the AO Spine PROST [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Comparison of the overall satisfaction [Срок оценки: 3 months post-operative and 12-months postoperative]
  • Complications-determination in relation to surgery [Срок оценки: 1 year post-operative]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Postmenopausal women ≥ 50 years old or men > 60 years old

o Menopause refers to amenorrhea for 1 complete year.

  • Radiologically confirmed new diagnosis of symptomatic, single or multilevel TL (from T1 to L5) fractures, ie, the index fracture(s).
  • In case of a multilevel fracture, the fracture must be contiguous.
  • The index fracture is confirmed by MRI as an insufficiency (or fragility) fracture or is confirmed by CT or MRI as traumatic fracture (low-energy trauma)
  • The index fracture(s) is a result of primary osteoporosis. Diagnosis of primary osteoporosis is based on any of the followings in the absence of causes for secondary osteoporosis (such as long-term use of steroids, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes mellitus \[DM\], and other metabolic bone disorders \[eg, rickets/osteomalacia, Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, and primary hyperparathyroidism\]) \[13-15\]:
  • A T-score ≤ -2.5 in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, or 1/3 radius
  • Presence of fragility fracture (either a previous fragility fracture or the index fracture is a fragility fracture). Fragility fractures are fractures due to no or low-energy trauma, eg, slips, trips, or falls from less than double the body height, and heavy lifting.
  • The index osteoporotic TL fracture being classified based on the OF Classification from OF 1 to OF 5:
  • OF 1: No deformation (vertebral body edema on MRI using short tau inversion recovery \[STIR\] sequence)
  • OF 2: Deformation of one endplate
  • OF 3: Deformation of one endplate with distinct posterior wall involvement
  • OF 4: Deformation of both endplates with/without posterior wall involvement
  • OF 5: Injuries with anterior or posterior tension band failure
  • Ability to provide informed consent according to the EC/IRB defined and approved procedures

Критерии исключения

  • Patients with spinal tumors
  • Patients with concomitant cervical fractures
  • Patients showing any signs of spinal infections
  • Patients with fractures due to high-energy or high-impact trauma, eg, a fall from double the body height or higher, motor vehicle accident with > 100 km/h in cars with airbags, or motor vehicle accident > 50 km/h without airbags, polytrauma
  • Patients with concomitant fracture in the pelvis, upper extremities, and/or lower extremities which could affect the main study outcomes (specifically, patient mobility and pain)
  • Patients for whom no FUs are possible
  • Previous instrumented surgery in the affected spine levels
  • Patients with single-level fracture or contiguous multilevel fracture adjacent to previous instrumented surgery
  • Patients who are mentally impaired and therefore not able to adhere to the study procedures and data collection
  • Patients who are bedridden before the index fracture
  • Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs and alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessments
  • Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Модель наблюдения
Когортное

Центры проведения

США · 2 центра
  • University of California San Francisco (USCF) Department of Orthopaedic Surgery — San Francisco
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital — Philadelphia
Аргентина · 1 центр
  • Sanatorio Güemes — Buenos Aires
Бразилия · 1 центр
  • Cajuru University Hospital — Curitiba
Чили · 1 центр
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago — Santiago
Египет · 1 центр
  • Orthopaedic Department, Assiut University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine — Asyut
Финляндия · 1 центр
  • Tampere University Hospital — Tampere
Германия · 1 центр
  • Center for Spinal and Scoliosis Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien — Erlangen
Индия · 1 центр
  • PGIMER - Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research — Chandigarh
Япония · 1 центр
  • Dokkyo Medical University Hospital — Tochigi
Малайзия · 1 центр
  • Island Hospital Spine Centre — George Town
Румыния · 1 центр
  • Spiatlul Clinic De Urgenta, "Profesor Doctor Nicolae Oblu" — Iași
Саудовская Аравия · 1 центр
  • Security Force Hospital — Riyāḑ
Швейцария · 1 центр
  • Spital Emmental - Orthopädie Sonnenhof — Burgdorf
Великобритания · 1 центр
  • King's College Hospital — London

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07027306 · TL-OF

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗