The CohorFES: a Prospective Study of Frailty and Dependence

1. Background of the study:

Frailty is one of the major challenges of the 21st Century, and a top priority for national and international organisms like the WHO (World Health Organization) or the European Parliament. This has put frailty as one of the top priorities in the biomedical research agenda of the European Commission. Frailty is constituted by a physiological state of increased vulnerability and impaired resilience to stressors (i.e. diseases, external agents, drugs tolerability and toxicity) due to the combined effect of the aging process and some chronic diseases which drives to a final stage of dependency and disability with a sharp impact in quality of life, health and social resources consumption, hospitalization and death.

It is well-known the relevance of frailty, its detection, and management since we are aware about their reversibility, the costs on the health systems, and its potential impact in clinical settings. In a clear contrast with the abundancy of data in non-clinical settings, there is a lack of strong data in the clinical setting where the prevalence of frailty is higher and where the risks for developing its most serious adverse consequences is more likely. There is hence an urgent need for a better screening and diagnosis of frailty, its trajectories and the determinants of these separate trajectories depending upon both the characteristics of frailty in each patient (associated or not with sarcopenia, or cognitive impairment or different clusters of chronic diseases). 2. Review of prior research:

While the different categories of the syndrome based on the severity of the observed deficits (robust, frail, pre-frail) are quite well defined and characterized from an epidemiological point of view, there is a scarcity of data on the functional pathways between these diagnostic categories (and, among them, disability), and this is especially true in clinical cohorts. This is really shocking considering that one of the most relevant factors, if not the first one, associated with a poor evolution of frailty is to experience an episode of hospitalization.

The overarching goal of this study is therefore, to identify the critical subgroups of subjects at risk of progression from robustness to prefrailty and frailty and from there to their late stages, and the pathways that mediate this trajectory amongst community-dwelling Spanish subjects.

Another important issue in this field would be to find an easy tool to identify frailty and factors which could be implemented in our full outpatients list. In addition to the more classical instruments to assess frailty, several groups currently members of CIBER on Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES) developed an instrument that overcomes some of the problems raised by the more classical ones. The Frailty Trait Scale-FTS has shown a good predictive capacity for some outcomes in very old patients living in the community. More recently, and as part of an EU-funded project (FRAILTOOLS) we have found that the full version of FTS is able to detect frailty in some clinical settings (Acute Care Geriatric Unit, Geriatric Service outpatient office and Primary Care), with a good predictive capacity for adverse outcomes (death, incident disability, deterioration in SPPB, falls and hospitalization) at 6-12-18 months. However, the full version of FTS, composed of 12 items, takes around 15 minutes, making it unpractical in usual clinical conditions, where the time available by the physician or the nurse is lower. With this fact in mind, a shorter version of only 5 items (the so-called FTS 5) was developed.

This shorter version takes less time, but more interestingly, FTS 5 offers promising results based upon the sensitivity to detect small changes shown by the full FTS. Finally, the variables that compose the FTS5 (gait velocity, grip strength, BMI, PASE, and balance) can be incorporated into electronic instruments. This has been the case for the electronic frailty index (eFI), developed and validated in the British electronic records based on the Rockwood's frailty model that would allow to assess the frailty profile after to consider 36 items or deficits at the same moment of visit by primary care o hospital physician or the more recent Hospital Frailty Risk Score based on clinical diagnoses that is able to predict death but showing only a fair concordance with the Frailty Phenotype and the Frailty Index.

The use of easy electronic tools has been useful not only in hospital care but also in routine primary care practice. Moreover, it would be easier to measure the adverse outcomes, including falls, delirium, disability, care home admission, hospitalization and mortality as it has been recently shown. 3. Rationale of study:

Inside this conceptual framework and considering the scarce data available in clinical settings about frailty diagnosis, trajectories and prognosis, the main goal of this project is to stablish a clinical, real-life and prospective cohort (COHORFES) to identify clinical and biological phenotypic clusters that drive through the different stages of frailty and to identify the underlying mechanisms that finally will trigger the disability.

• Bone Mineral Density [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 5 years]
• Abnormal peripheral blood biochemistry [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 5 years]
• Age [Срок оценки: baseline]
• Date of Birth [Срок оценки: baseline]
• Sex [Срок оценки: baseline]
• Living situation [Срок оценки: baseline]
• Educational level [Срок оценки: baseline]
• All-cause mortality. [Срок оценки: From baseline until the date of death from any cause, an average of 5 years]
• Condition diagnosis [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 5 years]
• Usual treatments [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 5 years]
• Pharmacy use [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 5 years]
• Loss of weight [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 5 years]