Feasibility Study to Compare Two Ventilatory Modes for Mechanical Ventilation Weaning
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: BIPAPasynchro: byphaisc positive pressure modality without any synchronisation.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Mechanical Ventilation Weaning. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Швейцария
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Comparison of Two Strategies to Allow Mechanical Ventilation Separation Using Biphasic Airway Pressure Ventilation Without Any Synchronization (BIPAP) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV): a Randomized Feasibility Trial
Обзор
We hypothesize that the ventilatory mode Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure without any synchronization (BIPAPasynchro) may facilitate the weaning process of patients intubated with acute hypoxiemic respiratory failure (AHRF) by obviating the problem of patient-ventilator asynchrony. In order to prove this hypothesis a large randomized controlled study should be perfromed comparing BIPAPasynchro versus pressure support ventilation (PSV), the most widely used ventilatory mode during the weaning process. In order to do so, a feasibility trial to demonstrate the ICU personnel can effectively use a non-standard ventilatory mode should be first performed. The objective of our study is, thus, to demonstrate the feasibility of using BIPAasynchro in the Lausanne Adult ICU.
Подробное описание
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure without any synchronization (BIPAPasynchro) ventilation is a ventilatory modality that guarantees a minimal mandatory minute ventilation, even in deeply sedated patients, and allows free spontaneous breathing as soon as possible, without requiring synchronization between the patient and the ventilator. The hypothesis is that, as it obviates the problem of patient-ventilator asynchrony, it could reduce, compared to pressure support ventilation (PSV), the need of sedation, decrease diaphragmatic atrophy and accelerate the liberation from mechanical ventilation (weaning phase) without exposing the patients to further risks. Data seems to suggest a potential benefit of BIPAPasynchro over PSV, but no large randomized controlled trials have been performed to compare the two techniques; however, this cannot be done after first demonstrating that it is feasible to use BIPAPasynchro in the weaning process from mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit.
The present project aims at assessing the feasibility of using a standardized BIPAP weaning strategy. It is thus a feasibility trial that assesses the adherence to the use of the mode. It is a randomized trial with two parallel groups in which we will compare the percentage of time effectively spent in the assigned mode, either BIPAP asynchro (intervention group) or PSV (control group), since the first switch from assist-control ventilation to assisted ventilation.
The study primary endpoint is the percentage of patients who spent at least 65% of the time (a priori-chosen cut-off) in the assigned mode (either BIPAPasynchro or PSV mode) since the first switch to assisted ventilation until successful liberation from mechanical ventilation. Liberation from mechanical ventilation (successful weaning) is defined as follows: 1) for intubated patients, we consider the patient weaned from ventilation when extubated without reintubation within 72 hours. 2) For tracheostomized patients, we consider the patient weaned from ventilation as soon as ventilated less than 12h over 24h during three consecutive days.
The secondary endpoints are divided in other-feasibility endpoints, safety endpoints and exploratory endpoints.
The study secondary feasibility endpoints are:
1. the proportions of participants who are switched to the non-assigned mode (cross-over from one study group to the other). Concretely, this refers to the situations where the patients in the PSV group are ventilated in BIPAPasynchro and the patients in the BIPAPasynchro group are ventilated in PSV. 2. The percentage of time spent in the non-assigned ventilatory mode since patient inclusion; 3. reasons for cross-over; 4. physicians refusal rate of patient enrolment; 5. reasons of physicians refusal if applicable; 6. recruitment rates.
Secondary safety endpoints
The study secondary safety endpoints are: 7. pneumothoraxes rate; 8. unplanned extubation rate; 9. rate of severe respiratory acidosis (pH \< 7.20); 10. rate of severe respiratory alkalosis (pH \> 7.55); 11. ventilation acquired pneumonia (VAP) rate (13).
Secondary exploratory endpoints
The study secondary exploratory endpoints are: 12. ventilator-free-days at day 28 from intubation (VFDs-28); 13. ventilator-free-days at day 28 from randomization; 14. duration of invasive mechanical ventilation between randomization and successful weaning, as defined in § 2.2.1; 15. duration of invasive mechanical ventilation between randomization and successful weaning, defined as no reintubation (or reventilation) during 7 days after extubation 16. number of tracheostomized patients during the weaning process; 17. number of patients matching the criteria for difficult or prolonged weaning (14). 18. length of ICU stay (censored at day 90 after randomization); 19. ICU-free days at day 90 from randomization; 20. length of Hospital stay (censored at day 90 from randomization); 21. hospital-free days at day 90 from randomization; 22. proportion of days with RASS less or equal -2 (for almost 50% of daily assessments) during invasive mechanical ventilation; 23. proportion of days with sedation during invasive mechanical ventilation; 24. proportion of days with neuromuscular blocking agents administration for ventilation facilitation during invasive mechanical ventilation; 25. ICU mortality (censored at day 90 from randomization); 26. hospital mortality (censored at day 90 from randomization).
This is a prospective, open-label, parallel-group, randomized feasibility trial taking place in the Adult ICU of the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland. Due to the nature of the research, this is an open-label study. Patients will be randomized with a 1:1 ratio for receiving either BIPAPasynchro or PSV as soon as switching to assisted ventilation is considered as possible by the attending physician.
Вмешательства
- Процедура BIPAPasynchro: byphaisc positive pressure modality without any synchronisation
Patients will be switched to byphaisc positive pressure modality without any synchronisation (BIPAPasynchro) as soon as they are considered to be ready to initiate the weaning phase from mechanical ventilation. Lausanne adult intesive care physicians will be provided a protocol to help guide them with the setting of BIPAPasynchro, as this is different from standard clinical pratice.
Первичные конечные точки
- Percentage of time spent in the mode of assisted ventilation assigned by the randomization [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
Вторичные конечные точки (12)
- The proportions of participants who are switched to the non-assigned mode (cross-over from one study group to the other) [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- The percentage of time spent in the non-assigned ventilatory mode since patient inclusion [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- Reasons for cross-over [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- Physicians refusal rate of patient enrolment [Срок оценки: At time of potential enrollement]
- Reasons of physicians refusal if applicable [Срок оценки: At time of potential enrollement]
- Recruitment rates [Срок оценки: At time of enrollment]
- Pneumothoraxes rate [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- Unplanned extubation rate [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilaton or death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- Rate of severe respiratory acidosis (pH < 7.20) [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- Rate of severe respiratory alkalosis (pH > 7.55) [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- Ventilation acquired pneumonia (VAP) rate [Срок оценки: From enrollement until liberation from mechanical ventilation or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days]
- Ventilator-free-days at day 28 from intubation [Срок оценки: from intubation to 28 days after intubation]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Intubated ICU patient with acute respiratory failure;
- PaO2-FiO2 ratio of less than 300 mmHg (40 kPa) at least one hour after intubation;
- control or assist-control ventilation;
- expected duration of mechanical ventilation of more than 24 hours;
- clinician in charge considers that the patient can be switched to assisted ventilation (weaning phase start);
- informed consent obtained by the patient himself / legal representative or authorization received from independent physician
Критерии исключения
- less than 18 years old;
- pregnant women (because of very different respiratory mechanics);
- severe obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2);
- known obstructive pulmonary disease;
- expected death within one week or very poor prognosis with end-of-life care decision expected/treatment withdrawal;
- neurological disorders heavily influencing breathing pattern, like suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury, spinal injury above C8, severe traumatic brain injury, polyneuropathies (ex. Guillain-Barré, myasthenia gravis);
- home non-invasive ventilation prior to ICU admission, except CPAP for obstructive sleeping apnoea syndrome;
- tracheostomised at ICU admission;
- suspected or proven broncho-pleural fistulas;
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment;
- ICU admission for major burns;
- enrolment in other trial with competitive outcomes or treatment strategies;
- Known opposition to research participation if patient is not able to consent (eg patient with refused GC)
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Открытое
- Основная цель
- Поддерживающая терапия
Центры проведения
Швейцария · 2 центра
- University Hospital of Lausanne — Lausanne
- Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) — Lausanne
Публикации
- Baum M, Benzer H, Putensen C, Koller W, Putz G. [Biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP)--a new form of augmented ventilation]. Anaesthesist. 1989 Sep;38(9):452-8. German. PMID 2686487
- Richard JM, Beloncle FM, Beduneau G, Mortaza S, Ehrmann S, Diehl JL, Prat G, Jaber S, Rahmani H, Reignier J, Boulain T, Yonis H, Richecoeur J, Thille AW, Declercq PL, Antok E, Carteaux G, Vielle B, Brochard L, Mercat A; REVA network. Pressure control plus spontaneous ventilation versus volume assist-control ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomised clinical trial. Intensive PMID 39287651
- Gama de Abreu M, Cuevas M, Spieth PM, Carvalho AR, Hietschold V, Stroszczynski C, Wiedemann B, Koch T, Pelosi P, Koch E. Regional lung aeration and ventilation during pressure support and biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation in experimental lung injury. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R34. doi: 10.1186/cc8912. Epub 2010 Mar 16. PMID 20233399
- Richard JC, Lyazidi A, Akoumianaki E, Mortaza S, Cordioli RL, Lefebvre JC, Rey N, Piquilloud L, Sferrazza Papa GF, Mercat A, Brochard L. Potentially harmful effects of inspiratory synchronization during pressure preset ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):2003-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3032-7. Epub 2013 Aug 9. PMID 23928898
- Katzenschlager S, Simon CM, Rehn P, Grilli M, Fiedler MO, Muller M, Weigand MA, Neetz B. Time-controlled adaptive ventilation in patients with ARDS-lack of protocol adherence: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2023 Feb 10;27(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04340-w. No abstract available. PMID 36765424
- Rathgeber J, Schorn B, Falk V, Kazmaier S, Spiegel T, Burchardi H. The influence of controlled mandatory ventilation (CMV), intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and biphasic intermittent positive airway pressure (BIPAP) on duration of intubation and consumption of analgesics and sedatives. A prospective analysis in 596 patients following adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1997 Nov;14(6 PMID 9466092
- Elrazek EA. Randomized prospective crossover study of biphasic intermittent positive airway pressure ventilation (BIPAP) versus pressure support ventilation (PSV) in surgical intensive care patients. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Oct;17(6):1009-21. PMID 15651509
- Rose L, Hawkins M. Airway pressure release ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure: a systematic review of definitional criteria. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1766-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1216-3. Epub 2008 Jul 17. PMID 18633595
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT06912906 · 2024-00432