Меню
Идёт набор NCT06871488

Predictors of Improvements in Irritability and Aggression in Children With ADHD Treated With CNS Stimulants

Фаза IV С лечением ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity Irritability Aggression Childhood

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: CNS Stimulant, Placebo, CNS Stimulant open label first phase.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity, Irritability, Aggression Childhood. Базовые параметры: 7 лет — 12 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
США
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Identification of Neural Markers of Aggression and Irritability and Their Capacity to Predict Treatment Response to CNS Stimulant Medication in Youth With ADHD

Обзор

Impulsive Aggression and chronic irritability (IACI) often occur together and are one of the most common reasons children present for behavioral health (BH) care. ADHD frequently associated with IACI as upwards of 50% of youth with ADHD manifest impairing IACI levels. IACI is the most common reason that children with ADHD are prescribed antipsychotics and admitted to inpatient BH units. Systematic dose optimization of CNS stimulants improves levels of IACI, reducing the need for these more intensive and burdensome treatments. However, response varies, with over half of children with ADHD showing meaningful improvement, upwards of 40% receiving minimal benefit and 3 to 10% exhibiting increased IACI levels. Symptom levels of ADHD or IACI and other demographic variables are of limited utility for predicting response, suggesting the need to move beyond symptoms in the search for treatment predictors. Youth with ADHD and IACI struggle with multiple aspects reinforcement learning (RL), defined as learning from interactions with the environment to reach a goal. Successful RL efforts tap multiple cognitive functions. In controlled laboratory tasks, youth with IACI and various BH disorders exhibit excessive behavioral and neural response to receiving reward (reward responsiveness), difficulty processing environmental cues to adapt behavior to meet a goal (set shifting/goal updating) and impaired ability to flexibly attend to relevant stimuli when blocked from a goal (frustrative nonreward). Event related potentials (ERP) are small electrical responses in the brain in response to specific events or stimuli measured by electroencephalogram (EEG) testing. ERPs exist that can serve as established neural measures of each of these cognitive functions offering a child friendly means to assess their contribution to observable levels of IACI. CNS stimulants improve functioning in these specific realms and impact associated ERPs to the degree that differences between ADHD and non-ADHD youth disappear. This study will examine the capacity of these ERPs to predict levels of IACI exhibited by children with ADHD when at home. Investigators will then assess if variability across children in the capacity of CNS stimulants to impact RL associated ERPs accounts for differences in the clinical effects of CNS stimulant medications to improve IACI at home using a multimethod battery integrating ERPs, parent report and task performance. Specifically, investigators will examine variance in the reward positivity (RewP) ERP when receiving reward feedback, the switch positivity (SwP) ERP measuring mental effort when cued to shift set and the change in P3b amplitude measuring attention allocation when transitioning from reward to nonreward on a go-no-go task. To achieve these aims, 136 children with ADHD and elevated IACI levels will have their CNS stimulant dose optimized over six weeks and then complete a two week within subjects crossover trial of placebo versus optimal dose. ERP collection will be completed within each blinded week. Parent ratings will be gathered 3 times per day including during peak and off-peak times of medication efficacy to capture the variance in IACI levels within the day and disentangle reports of worsening IACI related to loss of previously beneficial medication effects versus those most likely related to a direct adverse response to medication.

Подробное описание

This is clinical trial of CNS stimulants will enroll 136 youth with ADHD and elevated levels of impulsive aggression and chronic irritability (IACI). It employs a 6 week open label dose optimization trial followed by a 2 week within subjects crossover phase of optimal dose versus placebo. In our preliminary work, the study team observed that about 50 to 60% of children will show moderate or greater improvements in IACI with CNS Stimulants dose optimization. This response appears independent of ADHD symptom change. Across studies, 5 to 10% of youth with ADHD experience increased IACI, but there are no reliable predictors of IACI worsening. Youth with IACI have multiple impairments with reinforcement learning that can manifest at the neural level as altered event response potentials (ERP) and at the behavioral level as impaired cognitive task performance. For example, investigators demonstrated that youth with IACI showed enhanced response to reward feedback and reduced capacity to allocate attention under frustration manifesting as alterations in the amplitude of the Reward Positivity (RewP) and P3b ERPs respectively. Others have demonstrated that youth with IACI have impairments in shifting set as captured by the switch positivity ERP (SwP). Not such impairments are seen in youth with ADHD but not elevated IACI levels. All three of these ERPs are impacted by CNS stimulants, and these medications have been shown to improve reinforcement learning (RL) in youth with ADHD when it is impaired. Therefore, the study team theorizes that the degree of IACI improvement in IACI seen with CNS stimulants will correlate with the level of ERP amplitude change seen with these medications.

To test this theory, investigators will recruit 136 youth ages 8 to 12 with ADHD and elevated levels of IACI. All participants will first have their stimulant dose optimized (any oral FDA approved stimulant for ADHD that be can blinded) over 6 weekly visits using weekly ratings gathered from guardians and teachers. If ADHD symptoms show a 25% or greater improvement and there is not a moderate worsening in IACI levels (it is expected that 50%or more of participants will show reduced levels, 35% little change, 5-10% mild worsening and few if any will show moderate or worse impairment), then participants will be advanced to a 2 week within subjects double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) phase using a within subjects crossover design with each participant receiving their optimal dose of CNS stimulant and placebo for one week apiece. A thrice daily ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol measuring ADHD and IACI levels will be completed in each of these two weeks levels to address the appreciable temporal fluctuations in IACI seen across the day at home. In each blinded week, guardians will complete three ratings per day of IACI and ADHD. During times when medication effects are active, participants will complete an approximately one-hour EEG testing battery within each condition (once on med/ once on placebo) measuring these ERP amplitudes. Participants, guardians and study staff will be masked to intervention status during the RCT phase but not the open label dose optimization phase. All EEG data collection will occur under blinded conditions. This within subjects design reduces inter subject variance which is essential for identification of treatment biomarkers by predetermining each participants optimal dose and then using each participant as their own control.

Participants will be 136 youth with ADHD and elevated levels of IACI ages 8 to 12. Elevated levels of IACI will be defined by guardian rating on the Affective Reactivity Index (ARI) and Revised Modified Overt Aggression Score (RMOAS) as both are representative of an impairing level of IACI. Children will also be required to have at least moderate impairment (4+) on the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS) and the ADHD Clinical Global Impressions Severity Score (CGI-S) and meet full diagnostic criteria for ADHD. ADHD will be assessed using the Disruptive Behaviors Disorder Guardian Interview given by masters level staff. It assesses all ADHD symptoms and all other DSM ADHD criteria. The guardian interview will be supplemented with teacher ratings of ADHD (Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale \[DBD-RS\]) and classroom functioning (IRS) to verify impairment and symptoms occur across settings. A dual clinician review by study MD/PhD will make a final diagnosis by integrating teacher and guardian report using the OR rule. Where disagreement occurs, a third clinician will be consulted. Many youth with ADHD and elevated IACI have comorbid behavioral health conditions. Consistent with past ADHD trials for IACI, investigators will exclude youth with prominent autism traits (defined as mean score above 3.2 on the Autism Symptoms Dimension Questionnaire) or current major depression. However, anxious or subthreshold depressive symptoms do not impede the ability of CNS stimulants to improve ADHD or IACI. Comorbid conditions will be assessed on the Kidde Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Computerized Version (KSADS-Comp). Cases scoring positive on the KSADS-Comp for current depression will be further assessed by parent interview with the KSADS Present and Lifetime module (KSADS-PL) to verify symptoms scoring positive as depression on the comp version are not due to overlapping ADHD symptoms (concentration problems) or stimulant side effects (insomnia or sleep delay) as the PL version has specific rule out prompts for these issues lacking in the COMP version. To better examine their impact on planned outcomes, depression and anxiety symptoms will also be measured dimensionally by guardian and youth report on the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25). Stimulant optimization is advised before considering other psychotropics for aggression, so antipsychotics will be exclusionary. Antidepressants, alpha agonists and psychotherapy will be allowed and examined as covariates if dose has been stable for 30+ days as they do not meaningfully change amplitude of the selected ERPs or the response to CNS stimulants. Doses of outside medication and therapy frequency/format/modality must be held stable for study duration. Children who lack the cognitive, visual or auditory capacity to complete laboratory tasks or have a medical/psychiatric contraindication to CNS stimulants will be excluded as will youth with 2+ fully optimized methylphenidate trials AND 2+ amphetamine trials. This last requirement should not lead to appreciable exclusions as CNS stimulants are often not titrated to optimal doses. Youth who are stimulant naïve will be allowed to enroll as long as they meet enrollment criteria and do not have medical conditions that would preclude use of CNS stimulants (seizure disorder, significant structural cardiac abnormalities, severe tics, etc.). Study staff will meet with families to review study goals and commitments and complete consent and assent. During the intake assessment, a MD clinician will complete a thorough medication history to review past medication trials of CNS stimulants as well as health variables that may impact tolerability of CNS stimulants (e.g. sleep and appetite). The clinician driven ADHD RS 5 interview and the clinician driven ARI interview (C-ARI) will be completed with parent and child to assess current level of ADHD symptoms and IACI levels and repeatedly weekly during the dose optimization phase. The Clinician-ARI Interview is a semi structured interview which codes levels of IACI on a 0-100 metric with separate ratings for levels of irritability and aggression, based on ratings of frequency, duration and severity for each. This relatively new measure will provide critical information about the timing of IACI, assisting with medication selection. It will be repeated at the end of dose optimization phase as part of a multimethod battery of IACI to compare agreement between guardian ratings of IACI and clinician assessment.

Dose Optimization Phase: An initial medication option will be selected based on the participant's past medication trials and current temporal patterns of impairment (time of day of greatest impairment) with a focus on improving ADHD levels across the day and IACI levels at home. All study medication will be prescribed by licensed physicians expert in the treatment of pediatric ADHD and IACI (three child psychiatrists and one general pediatrician that are study investigators). All study treatments consist of only CNS stimulants approved for the treatment of pediatric ADHD or placebo. Methylphenidate will be the preferred initial option based on prior IACI treatment trials but amphetamine products will also be allowed; however, any FDA approved medication in either of these stimulant classes can be employed as long as it can be blinded for the RCT phase (no liquids or dissolve tabs or transdermals unless our research pharmacy can obtain a comparable blind). Children will be taught to swallow capsules during the open label medication phase using established procedures from past trials in this same population. The employed dosing will be consistent with standard clinical practice and past trials in youth with IACI and ADHD, with doses adjusted by one dosing increment at a time. During the 6 week dose optimization period, study clinicians will adjust dose using weekly guardian and teacher ratings collected and direct interview of guardian using the ADHD RS 5 interview until optimal dose is achieved based on efficacy and tolerability ratings. Participants will complete weekly visits with study physicians to adjust CNS stimulant dose. At each weekly visit, guardians will complete the ARI and R-MOAS, a brief measure of functional impairment (IRS) as well medication tolerability with the Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale (PSERS). Guardians will also be asked to identify for each dosing the day, the hour when medication benefits appear to onset and the hour when they appear to have fully dissipated in order to identify medicated and unmedicated time periods of the day to be used to define the EMA sampling times for the following RCT stage. Clinicians will complete the ADHD-RS interview to measure change in ADHD symptoms and the Clinical Global Impressions Severity and Improvement Scale (CGI S and I) separately for ADHD and IACI to assess change in each since baseline and total current severity of each construct over the past week. Every week, teachers will be sent a link to a secure survey for them to rate the current level of ADHD symptoms and oppositional behaviors (IOWA Conners) and IACI levels at school (6 item teacher version of ARI and 6 item abridged RMOAS). Clinicians will also complete the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) each week with participants and guardians to measure risk for self-harm. In addition, guardian ratings of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder (DBD-RS will be collected). Expanded teacher ratings of ADHD, Conduct Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder that capture every DSM symptom will also be collected at endpoint (DBD RS). Vitals (height, weight, blood pressure, pulse) will be collected at every in person office visit, with in-office visits required at least every two weeks. Alternating visits can be done via HIPAA compliant telehealth platforms. The dose optimization period can last up to 6 weeks but may end sooner if participants meet criteria for optimal dose. For dose to be considered optimal and the titration to end before week 6, CGI improvement (CGI-I) ratings for ADHD must be at much be much or very much improved levels with acceptable medication tolerability for at least two consecutive visits with clinicians deeming that further improvement is not expected or higher doses could not be tolerated. The study team has employed this same definition in prior NIH studies (MH083692). Once dose has been optimize

Вмешательства

  • Препарат CNS Stimulant
    The second treatment phase (blinded within subjects crossover) will compare one week of the optimal dose of CNS Stimulant (from the prior phase) to one week of placebo for a total of 14 days of data collection.
  • Препарат Placebo
    Placebo is only used during the second of two treatment phases. The second treatment phase (blinded within subjects crossover) will compare one week of the optimal dose of CNS Stimulant (from the prior phase) to one week of placebo.
  • Другое CNS Stimulant open label first phase
    The first treatment phase will optimize CNS stimulant dose under open label conditions using any approved FDA medication for pediatric ADHD at the FDA approved doses.

Первичные конечные точки

  • RCT phase: Guardian rated Affective reactivity Index (ARI) [Срок оценки: 7 days on med and for 7 days on placebo for 14 days of data collection]
  • Open label dose opt: ADHD RS 5 clinician interview [Срок оценки: 6 visits (over a max duration of 12 weeks)]
  • RCT phase abridged Revised modified overt aggression scale (RMOAS) [Срок оценки: 7 days on med and 7 days on placebo for 14 days of data collection]
Вторичные конечные точки (12)
  • Open label dose opt: affective reactivity index -guardians (ARI) [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Open label dose opt: affective reactivity index teachers (ARI) [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Open label dose opt: RMOAS by guardians [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Open label dose opt: RMOAS by teachers [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • RCT phase: Clinical Global Impressions: Impairment and Severity (CGI I/S) [Срок оценки: weekly for 2 weeks]
  • Open label dose opt Clinical Global Impressions: Impairment and Severity (CGI I/S) [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Open label dose opt: Teacher Rated Inattention/Overactivity with Aggression (IOWA) [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Open label dose opt: Guardian Rated Impairment Rated Scale (IRS) [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Open label dose opt: Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale (PSERS) [Срок оценки: every visit (every 1-2 weeks over max of 12 weeks)]
  • Open label dose opt affective reactivity index clinician interview (CARI) [Срок оценки: baseline (visit 1) and endpoint of this phase (max of 6 visits); each visit is spaced 1-2 weeks part so max time between measures would be 12 weeks]
  • rct phase: affective reactivity index clinician interview (CARI) [Срок оценки: completed weekly for two weeks]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Meet criteria for any presentation of ADHD
  • Moderate or worse impairment related to ADHD
  • Elevated levels of irritability and/or aggression on guardian ratings of Affective Reactivity Index and Retrospective Modified Overt Aggression Scale
  • fluent in English for child and guardian
  • Guardian and child are willing to have child take CNS stimulant medication for ADHD

Критерии исключения

  • Medical contraindications to use of CNS stimulants
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder,
  • Bipolar Disorder,
  • Intellectual/Developmental Delay
  • current use of antipsychotic, mood stabilizing
  • Use of other medications that impact EEG data collection (e.g. benzodiazepenes)
  • hearing or visual deficits that impede ability to do computer tasks
  • Current Major Depressive Episode
  • Current suicidal ideation
  • child has failed two fully optimized trials of methylphenidate products AND two for amphetamine products

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Перекрёстный дизайн
Маскирование
Четверное слепое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

США · 1 центр
  • Penn State Health Dept of Psychiatry — Hershey

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT06871488 · MH137647

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗