Меню
Набор скоро начнётся NCT06835153

Automatic Feedback Indicator to Enhance the Hospital Discharge Communication Between Acute Care and Primary Care.

Без фазы С лечением Continuity of Care Patient Safety Hospital Discharge Communication Processes Communication

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Monthly Performance Feedback with Dashboards (Automated Audit and Feedback).
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Continuity of Care, Patient Safety, Hospital Discharge Communication Processes, Communication. Базовые параметры: Без ограничений · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Франция
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Automatic Feedback Indicator to Enhance the Hospital Discharge Communication Between Acute Care and Primary Care: a Randomized Controlled Cluster Trial

Обзор

This study, titled "Automated Indicator Feedback for Improving the Quality of Discharge Letters: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial" (FIAQ-LS), aims to evaluate whether continuous real-time feedback to hospital teams can improve the quality of discharge letters. Discharge letters are critical for ensuring continuity of care and reducing adverse events by providing detailed information about a patient's hospital stay to both the patient and their primary care physician. The study will be conducted at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital and involve 40 hospital services across three campuses. The trial design includes two parallel arms: an intervention group receiving monthly performance feedback through automated dashboards and a control group with no additional intervention. Services are randomized into these groups using a stratified cluster approach. The primary objective is to assess whether this intervention increases the proportion of discharge letters validated on the day of discharge compared to usual care. Secondary objectives include evaluating patient satisfaction, rates of unplanned 30-day readmissions, and completeness of discharge letter content. The study will include data from approximately 132,000 patient stays over two phases: a pre-implementation observational period (12 months) and an intervention phase (12 months). All data will be collected and analyzed anonymously, with findings expected to inform the broader implementation of quality improvement strategies in French hospitals.

Подробное описание

Detailed Description Effective communication at hospital discharge is vital for continuity of care and patient safety. Discharge letters summarize the hospital stay, outlining diagnoses, treatments, and follow-up care. Despite national guidelines mandating that discharge letters be validated and provided to patients on the day of discharge, compliance remains suboptimal in France, with average performance scores well below targets.

This study seeks to address this gap through an automated feedback mechanism. Using the hospital's electronic health record (EHR) system, the study will generate monthly dashboards for each participating service in the intervention group. These dashboards will provide a real-time view of performance metrics, including the proportion of discharge letters validated on the day of discharge and the completeness of required content fields.

The trial employs a cluster-randomized controlled design with 40 hospital services as the unit of randomization. Services are stratified by activity type (medicine, surgery/obstetrics) and baseline performance. The study is divided into two phases:

Pre-implementation Phase (January 2024 - January 2025): A 12-month observational period to collect baseline data and stratify services for randomization.

Implementation Phase (February 2025 - February 2026): Intervention services receive monthly performance feedback, while control services continue with standard care practices.

The primary endpoint is the proportion of hospital stays where discharge letters are validated on the day of discharge. Secondary outcomes include:

Patient satisfaction, measured through the national "e-Satis" survey. Rates of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. Completeness of discharge letters, evaluated across mandated content fields (e.g., patient identification, discharge summary, follow-up plan).

This study will enroll all eligible patient stays within the 40 participating services, excluding stays of less than 24 hours or cases where the patient died during hospitalization. The anticipated sample size is 132,000 stays.

Data collection will rely on routine administrative data from the EHR system, anonymized at the patient level. Statistical analyses will adopt a "difference-in-differences" approach, comparing changes in outcomes between the intervention and control groups over time. A mixed-effects logistic regression model will account for intra-cluster correlations.

The results of this study aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of automated feedback in driving quality improvements in hospital discharge processes. If successful, the approach could be scaled across other hospitals in France, contributing to better continuity of care and patient outcomes.

Вмешательства

  • Другое Monthly Performance Feedback with Dashboards (Automated Audit and Feedback)
    Hospital services in the intervention group will receive monthly automated dashboards that provide detailed performance metrics. These include: The proportion of patients with a discharge letter generated on the day of discharge, The proportion of discharge letters validated on the day of discharge, Median delays for generating discharge letters, Median delays for validating discharge letters. The dashboards are shared with all physicians, nurse managers, and secretarial staff in each service.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Proportion of Discharge Letters Generated on the Day of Discharge [Срок оценки: Measured monthly over the study period (January 2024 to February 2026), comparing a 12-month pre-implementation period to a 12-month intervention period.]
Вторичные конечные точки (6)
  • Proportion of Discharge Letters Validated on the Day of Discharge [Срок оценки: Measured monthly over the study period (January 2024 to February 2026), comparing a 12-month pre-implementation period to a 12-month intervention period.]
  • Median Time to Generate Discharge Letters [Срок оценки: Measured monthly over the study period (January 2024 to February 2026), comparing a 12-month pre-implementation period to a 12-month intervention period.]
  • Median Time to Validate Discharge Letters [Срок оценки: Measured monthly over the study period (January 2024 to February 2026), comparing a 12-month pre-implementation period to a 12-month intervention period.]
  • Time from Patient Discharge to Electronic Submission of Discharge Letter to Primary Care Physicians [Срок оценки: Measured monthly during the study period (January 2024 to February 2026), comparing the 12-month pre-implementation period to the 12-month intervention period.]
  • Patient Satisfaction with Discharge Process (e-Satis Survey) [Срок оценки: Collected monthly during the 12-month intervention period (February 2025 to February 2026).]
  • Rate of Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions [Срок оценки: Measured monthly over the study period (January 2024 to February 2026), comparing a 12-month pre-implementation period to a 12-month intervention period.]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Patients hospitalized for at least 24 hours in participating services.
  • Patients discharged alive directly from participating services.

Критерии исключения

  • Patients hospitalized for less than 24 hours.
  • Patients who died during hospitalization.
  • Stays in services not meeting inclusion criteria (e.g., psychiatry, long-term care, emergency services with rare direct discharges, or critical care units).

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Простое слепое
Основная цель
Организация здравоохранения

Центры проведения

Франция · 1 центр
  • Centre hospitalier de Grenoble Alpes — Grenoble

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT06835153 · PREPS-20-0195

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗