Меню
Идёт набор NCT06797973

Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Pain Management Following Planned Caesarean Section

Фаза IV С лечением Caesarean Section Postoperative Pain

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Intrathecal Morphine, Placebo (Sodium Chloride Injection, 0.9%).
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Caesarean Section, Postoperative Pain. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Женщины.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Дания
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

MOTHER Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Intrathecal Morphine Following Planned Caesarean Section - a Randomised, Blinded, Clinical, Controlled, Multicentre Trial.

Обзор

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if morphine added to the spinal anaesthesia can improve postoperative pain treatment for patients undergoing caesarean section, without increasing the risk of serious adverse events in mother and baby. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the treatment effective in preventing postoperative pain? * Is the treatment safe for both mother and baby? Participants will be given a normal spinal anaesthesia with addition of either morphine or sodium chloride (inactive substance). All participants will receive standard postoperative pain treatment, including morphine tablets as needed. Researchers will collect data from the electronic medical record and ask the participants to fill out questionnaires about pain levels and possible side effects.

Подробное описание

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

Caesarean section is surgical procedure associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, which can negatively affect recovery, mother-child bonding and the initiation of breastfeeding. Intrathecal morphine may offer pain relief for up to 24 hours, and is widely implemented and recommended as part of multimodal postoperative pain management. Despite the widespread use, there is limited evidence for the balance between benefits and harms of low-dose intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing caesarean section.

The objective of the trial is to evaluate analgesic efficacy as well as maternal and neonatal safety associated with addition of low-dose (80 µg) intrathecal morphine versus placebo to standard multimodal postoperative pain management in patients undergoing planned caesarean section.

The trial is a superiority, investigator-initiated, pragmatic, randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.

TRIAL SIZE: A total of 1,312 participants is required to show/reject a 35% relative increase in the composite co-primary safety outcome, with an estimated baseline incidence of 21% without intrathecal morphine and a power of 80%. We adjust statistically for having two primary outcomes by using an alpha of 2.5%. We reach a power of 99.9% for the co-primary outcome of pain score with an estimated mean Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) of 4.88, standard deviation of 2.0 and relevant mean difference of 1.0.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Intrathecal morphine for caesarean delivery represents a common medical practice which is not supported by robust evidence. High-quality data on efficacy and safety of the treatment will enable clinicians to tailor postoperative pain treatment to each patient, thus improving care for future patients. Choosing low-dose morphine minimises the risk of adverse effects, and all trial participants will receive standard multimodal pain treatment. There is no evidence of any harmful neonatal effects. All trial participants will give informed consent, and the trial will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki as well as national and international standards of good clinical practice.

PLANNED SUBSTUDIES:

* Incidence of desaturation and bradypnea during the first 24 hours following surgery, assessed using continuous wireless respiratory monitoring in a subpopulation of 100 patients at 3 trial sites. * Efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine in participant subgroups: The influence of different pre-existing factors on the primary outcomes

Вмешательства

  • Препарат Intrathecal Morphine
    80 μg preservative-free morphine (0.2 ml) added to a single-shot spinal anaesthesia consisting of 11.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 μg fentanyl
  • Препарат Placebo (Sodium Chloride Injection, 0.9%)
    0.2 ml of isotonic sodium chloride added to a single-shot spinal anaesthesia consisting of 11.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 μg fentanyl.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Level of pain when mobilising from supine to sitting position within 24 hours [Срок оценки: 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours following spinal anaesthesia]
  • Maternal and neonatal serious adverse events [Срок оценки: Within 7 days from discharge]
Вторичные конечные точки (5)
  • Opioid consumption within 24 hours [Срок оценки: Within 24 hours following spinal anaesthesia]
  • Morphine associated adverse effects within 24 hours [Срок оценки: Within 24 hours following spinal anaesthesia]
  • Obstetric quality of recovery score at 24 hours [Срок оценки: Within 24 hours following spinal anaesthesia]
  • Participants satisfaction with postoperative pain-treatment during the first 24 hours [Срок оценки: Within 24 hours following spinal anaesthesia]
  • Established breastfeeding at 30 days [Срок оценки: 30 days from surgery]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Patients ≥ 18 years
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Scheduled for planned caesarean section performed under spinal anaesthesia
  • Written informed consent

Критерии исключения

  • Allergy to or contraindications towards trial medication
  • Patients planned for postoperative epidural due to expected difficult postoperative pain management
  • Patients planned for combined spinal-epidural as primary anaesthesia
  • Inability to understand and read Danish
  • Previous inclusion in the trial

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Четверное слепое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

Дания · 8 центров
  • Aarhus University Hospital — Aarhus
  • Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet — Copenhagen
  • Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev — Herlev
  • Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød — Hillerød
  • Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre — Hvidovre
  • University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Lillebælt Hospital, Kolding — Kolding
  • University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Odense University Hospital — Odense C
  • Zealand University Hospital — Roskilde

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT06797973 · 2024-518678-16-00 · 2024-518678-16-00

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗