Feasibility Study of Caregiver-Assist Strategy Training

To address post-stroke activity limitations, intensive task-oriented rehabilitation is widely recommended across clinical guidelines. The caregiver is potentially able to play a facilitative role during the rehabilitation process. However, the best way to integrate caregivers into task-oriented rehabilitation is largely unknown. To address this gap, this preliminary study aims to assess the feasibility of a newly developed intervention, caregiver-assisted strategy training (CaST), in enhancing the activity performance of stroke survivors.

A mixed-methods (quantitative and qualitative) design, including a repeated measures design, is used in this feasibility study. A procedure of randomization with minimization will be conducted by a researcher who is independent of the investigation and outcome assessments. Eligible stroke survivors and their caregivers will be recruited from collaborative hospitals in Northern Taiwan and randomly assigned with even possibility. Longitudinal evaluations will be conducted at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), 3-month (T3), and 6-month (T4) follow-ups. Standardized assessments such as the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AMPAC), the Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaires (SSEQ), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) will be used to assess outcomes at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. The feasibility indicators, such as recruitment rates and intervention attendance and adherence, will be evaluated by questionnaires, field notes, and qualitative interviews after the interventions are completed. Quantitative data will be analyzed using multiple linear regression models and mixed-effects regression models. Furthermore, qualitative in-depth interviews with participants, caregivers, and therapists will be conducted post-intervention. These interviews will explore experiences, satisfaction, and perceived effectiveness of the intervention. Transcribed data will undergo coding by two independent coders and subsequent analysis through the thematic analysis method.

• Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D) [Срок оценки: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)]
• EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) [Срок оценки: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)]
• Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaires (SSEQ) [Срок оценки: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)]
• Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [Срок оценки: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)]
• Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [Срок оценки: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)]
• Goal Attainment Scale [Срок оценки: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)]
• Client Satisfaction Questionnaire [Срок оценки: At the end of intervention, 5 to 10 weeks from the baseline]