Меню
Идёт набор NCT06740357

Implementation of a Tumor Response Assessment Program Integrating the Shared Medical Decision Into the Organ Preservation Strategy for Rectal Cancer Patients

Без фазы С лечением Rectal Cancer

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Tumor response monitoring program, Standard evaluation of tumor response, Shared decision-making, Decision-making according to national recommendations.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Rectal Cancer. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 80 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Франция
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Implementation of a Tumor Response Assessment Program Integrating Shared Medical Decision Making Into the Organ Preservation Strategy for Rectal Cancer Patients: Phase III Randomized - Multicenter

Обзор

The adoption of total mesorectal excision (TME) has standardized rectal cancer surgery and improved oncological outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy (NACRT) has further improved oncological benefit. Although these strategies result in good 5-year disease-free survival rates, they are associated with significant morbidity, in particular permanent long-term bowel, urinary and sexual dysfunction. In rectal cancer management, the main objective of organ preservation is to avoid or reduce morbidity and impact on quality of life after rectal resection, without compromising oncological outcomes. The aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of a defined response monitoring program, including a shared decision process, as a strategy for assessing tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. This is a national, phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial comparing the tumor response monitoring program with shared decision-making, versus standard tumor response assessment in organ preservation strategies in rectal cancer.

Вмешательства

  • Другое Tumor response monitoring program
    three steps of tumor response evaluation (STEP 1 at 2 months, STEP 2 at 4 months, STEP 3 at 6 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment): STEP 1: digital rectal examination, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan STEP 2: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy STEP 3: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP or PET scan
  • Другое Standard evaluation of tumor response
    Assessment at 2 months (+/- 7 days) after neoadjuvant treatment: digital rectal exam, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan
  • Другое Shared decision-making
    At each stage of the monitoring program and depending on the clinical and oncological results, the decision to preserve the rectum will be discussed with the patient according to a shared-decision program.
  • Другое Decision-making according to national recommendations
    The decision to preserve the rectum is based on assessment at 2 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment (standard of care since the GRECCAR2 trial).
  • Другое Follow-up
    Every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for the third year

Первичные конечные точки

  • Organ preservation rate [Срок оценки: 2 years after the start of neoadjuvant treatment]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Patient aged 18 to 80
  • Histologically proven lieberkuhnian adenocarcinoma with MSS status ;
  • Patient who has or is due to receive neoadjuvant treatment (4 to 6 courses of (m)FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy + CAP 50 radiochemotherapy or CAP 50 radiochemotherapy alone);
  • BEFORE any neoadjuvant treatment:
  • Tumor classified T2T3 (on MRI)
  • N0-N1 (≤ 3 positive lymph nodes \* or size ≤ 8 mm) (on MRI)
  • \* positive node = node size > 5 mm minor axis and/or morphologically suspicious appearance Tumor size ≤4 cm (ON MRI)
  • No distant metastasis (M0)\_ TAP scan or PET scan
  • ≤ 8 cm from anal margin (On MRI) (Clinical examination\*)

\*if the clinical examination is not possible, then the source data is that of the MRI.

  • No invasion of the anal canal and/or sphincters (internal and external) (On MRI)
  • Operable patient
  • Ability to comply with the protocol and follow-up appointments (repeated assessment consultations and close follow-up if randomized to the Experimental Group);
  • Person affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme;
  • Free and informed consent signed by the patient.

Критерии исключения

  • Patients with a history of chemotherapy or pelvic irradiation (excluding neoadjuvant treatment)
  • Contraindication to pelvic MRI
  • Patients with MSI status undergoing immunotherapy
  • Other concomitant cancer or history of cancer within 5 years, with the exception of carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma or any other carcinoma in situ, considered cured
  • Women who are pregnant, likely to become pregnant, or who are breast-feeding;
  • Person under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice, or person deprived of liberty.
  • Unable to undergo medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Открытое
Основная цель
Другое

Центры проведения

Франция · 1 центр
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne — Dijon

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT06740357 · DROUILLARD PHRCK 2023-2

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗