R01.Aim 2.Study 1: IsoReach
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Isometric Reaching.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Stroke. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- США
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Error-enhanced Learning & Recovery in 2 & 3 Dimensions
Обзор
To determine the effects of 3D isometric movement training in healthy participants and impaired participants due to a stroke.
Подробное описание
Researchers have found that neurotypical adults are able to train movement skills when sensory sources, such as proprioception, are altered using isometric conditions and visual feedback in a two-dimensional environment.Building off this knowledge, the investigators plan to apply similar techniques to both neurotypical adults and stroke survivors with impaired movement, but in a three-dimensional environment. The investigators will ask participants to practice a unilateral virtual reality targeted reaching task using a robotic arm in a 3D visual display system mounted over the arm. Participants will be given visual feedback of their arm through a virtual avatar displayed on the screen. First, they will complete unconstrained targeted reaching and then complete targeted reaching with the robotic arm constrained in a fixed position ("isometric" movement). The forces applied to constrain the robotic arm will be translated to the virtual avatar arm on the screen, and it will look as if their arm is moving. The investigators will compare perpendicular errors (maximum difference between the ideal reaching trajectory and the actual) made in unconstrained and constrained movement conditions. The investigators aim to determine if the two movement conditions yield similar error responses when sensory sources are altered in a 3D environment.
Вмешательства
- Другое Isometric Reaching
The intervention of "Isometric Reaching" is the process of restricting the participant's hand movement in place, while using the forces they apply to the robot handle to drive a reaching arm simulation
Первичные конечные точки
- Perpendicular Error [Срок оценки: through study completion, an average of 1 year.]
Критерии участия
Inclusion criteria, neurotypical participants
- 18 years old
No history of stroke
Ability to provide informed consent .
Exclusion criteria, neurotypical participants
Severe medical problems (including cardiovascular, orthopedic, or neurological)
Medical problems affecting movement, range of motion, strength, or coordination of the upper extremities.
Visual deficits that would influence the ability to perform the experiment . This will be assessed using the following assessments:
- Visual field deficits will be assessed using the BIVABA acuity testing. (cutoff score \> 20/100)
- Depth perception deficits will be assessed using the Stereofly test (require at least an angle of stereopsis at 16 inches is 3,552 seconds of arc).
4\) Blood pressure above 140 systolic and/or 90 diastolic mmHG
5\) Blood oxygen reading of less than 92% by finger pulse oximeter testing.
Inclusion Criteria , Stroke participants
- 18 years old
Chronic stroke (8+ months post)
Available medical records and radiographic information about lesion locations
Hemiparesis
Primary motor cortex involvement
Some degree of both shoulder and elbow movement capability
Exclusion Criteria , Stroke participants
Bilateral paresis
Aphasia, cognitive impairment, or affective dysfunction that would influence the ability to perform the experiment, This will be assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination31, with cut-off scores (adjusted for education level) as follows:
Participants whose education are 7th grade or lower, a score 22 or lower
Participants whose education attainment level is 8th grade or some high school (but not a graduate), a score of 24 or lower
Participants whose education attainment level is high school graduate, a score of 25 or lower
Participants whose education attainment level is some college or higher, a score 26 or lower
Visual deficits, and hemispatial neglect that would prevent the participants from seeing the targets. A vision test will be done if the participant indicates in their screen that their stroke has affected their vision. This will be tested using the following assessments:
Visual field loss will be assessed using the BIVABA acuity test10. (cutoff score \> 20/100)
Visual Extinction and Inattention using Star Cancellation Test9. (cutoff score of \<44)
Depth perception deficits will be assessed using the Stereofly test (require at least an angle of stereopsis at 16 inches is 3,552 seconds of arc).
Modified Ashworth score of 4 at shoulder or elbow joints.
Rated below 15 on the FMUE scale
Inability to provide an informed consent
severe current medical problems
Severe sensory deficit in the affected limb (Cannot be absent in any part of affected UE)
diffuse/multiple lesion sites or multiple stroke events
Inability to attain and maintain testing positions
Botox or other botulinum toxin injection to the affected upper extremity within the previous 4 months
Concurrent participation in upper extremity rehabilitation either as part of a research intervention protocol or a prescribed therapy
Neurological, neuromuscular, or orthopedic diseases (i.e. injuries to your affected arm or hand)
Other neurological issues (Parkinson's, CP)
Blood Pressure above 140 systolic and/or 90 diastolic mmHg
Blood oxygen reading of less than 92% on finger pulse oximetry testing.
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Да
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Тройное слепое
- Основная цель
- Другое
Центры проведения
США · 1 центр
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — Chicago
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT06656754 · STU00220740