Study the Efficacy and Safety of the INtegral Cognitive REMediation Program (INCREM) for Depression

BACKGROUND: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder that places substantial clinical, social and economic burden onpatients, as well as on their families and wider society. The total cost of MDD is estimated at 170,000 million euros per year (www.euro.who.int), where more than a half are indirect costs such as loss of productivity in the workplace, sick leave and early retirement. In Spain, it is estimated that depression causes complete functional disability of 47 days per year on average and partial functional disability of 60 days per year (1). Particularly in Catalonia, depression had a direct health cost of €155 million, which rose to €735 million when lost productivity was included (temporary disability: 27%; permanent: 48%) in the last decade (2). The authors concluded that the cost of mental illness has a considerable impact from asocietal perspective, as direct costs in the public health system or indirect costs related to productivity losses are only part of total costs of depression (3). Some studies confirm that severity of depressive symptoms predicts the functional deterioration of patients, beyond losing a job or spending public health resources. More recent studies add that cognitive symptoms (i.e., alterations in executive functions, attention, memory and processing speed) are even more important independent predictors of such psychosocial dysfunction in subsequent depressive episodes (4). Therefore, cognitive symptoms could explain the low full recovery rates and the functional disability of patients with MDD (5,6). Although cognitive symptoms are nowadays recognized and partially incorporated as a criterion for the diagnosis of an episode of MDD (DSM-5), until recently no treatment addressed these symptoms. There is increasing evidence that patients with MDD show heterogeneity in cognitive difficulties, presenting different cognitive profiles in the first depressive episode as demonstrated in project PI13/01057 (IP: Maria J Portella) and in the different stages of the disease (7). Up to 45% of patients with treated MDD have permanent cognitive deficits (8), which significantly interfere with work and daily functioning (9).

Some evidence has acknowledged the poor efficacy of most pharmacological treatments in the improvement of cognitive symptoms (10). Although new antidepressants with other mechanisms of action seem to have different effects on the cognitive function, these still show low or moderate efficacy. Regarding non-pharmacological treatments, cognitive remediation (CR) has been investigated as a possible treatment of cognitive dysfunction of depressive disorders in the last decade. But the results are not fully satisfactory and efficacy is in its infancy. Different reasons have been suggested to explain the low impact of cognitive rehabilitation programs for MDD, among which the use of neurological models in the design of these programs, instead of using compensatory techniques more effective in psychiatric disorders (11); or the fact of not taking into account the episodic nature and tendency to chronicity of MDD, which implies very different profiles of cognitive involvement among patients (7). Therefore, a critical aspect of remediation programs for MDD is to adapt them to the cognitive profile of each patient.

In an attempt to improve previous results using poorly structured programs, computerized cognitive training (CCT) had proven to be more beneficial than available CR programs in patients with MDD (12). This type of training was based on mental tasks repetition, which ended up having an effect on patients' difficulties. Subsequently, several studies have shown that CCT is perhaps the best method of administration for MDD, as tasks are adjusted to the needs of each individual. In a meta-analysis including the 9 randomized studies that existed of CCT in MDD (13) it was observed how CCT was associated with a slight improvement of depressive symptoms but scarcely of daily functioning. In this regard, it should be noted that only two of the nine studies investigated the impact of treatment on global functioning specifically. Regarding cognitive benefits, the results depended on cognitive domains, seeing a notable improvement in working memory and attention, while executive functions and verbal memory remained altered. These benefits were not easily transferred to new tasks or only when they required the same processing requirements as trained tasks. Thus, one of the biggest problems of these computerized programs was the transfer of trained skills to daily life tasks, including work capacity. Another recent approach is the Goal Management Training (GMT), a strategy-based CR intervention. The findings comparing GMT with drill-and-practice CCT has shown long-term mental health following GMT, while improvements in everyday life might require additional treatment or maintenance to sustain (14). Sample sizes of previous works are extremely limited (n\<30), casting doubt on the representativeness of findings and thus impeding their generalization or implementation to real-world clinical settings. The study on Functional Remediation (FR) with the largest sample was carried out by the group of Martínez-Aran for patients with bipolar disorders in a multicentre clinical trial which showed efficacy of FR compared to treatment as usual (TAU) or psychosocial functioning (15). However, these programs did not include any tailored cognitive intervention at the individual level, such as CCT, and therefore the transfer of cognitive improvement to daily functioning was not achieved.

The mechanism of action of cognitive remediation interventions is still unknown. Very few studies have investigated biomarkers associated to CR response, apart from a unique study (11). There is mounting evidence that neurotrophic factors, immune markers and oxidative stress play a key role in cognitive dysfunction (16-20), regardless of underlying psychiatric pathology. Research of peripheral biomarkers and treatment response have described fairly consistent findings, in which neuroimmune alterations back to normal levels (16,17). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence suggests a possible link between structural/functional anomalies in the brain and on one hand, a decrease of growth factors and on the other, an increase of circulating inflammation and oxidative markers. Several of these studies have been carried out by the PI, as well as other members of the consortium (see references). Mostly, neuroimaging studies have reported alterations in brain regions involving fronto-temporal and cortico-limbic circuits (21), also related with pharmacological treatment response and prediction of recurrence (22) in the areas mentioned above, where smaller brain volumes typically estimate poorer treatment response, whereas larger brain volumes correlate with good response and remission. Less consensus has been achieved with white matter alterations (investigated with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), where some studies report lower white matter fractional anisotropy (FA) in good response to treatment, while others show the opposite (23). Other inconsistencies are found in functional MRI (fMRI) in treatment response, especially in task-based fMRI, but also in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC), partially due to a considerable variability in study designs (24). One of the recent MRI technical advances is to study microstructural changes in both grey and white matter, more expectable to be detected in usually normal-appearing brains (i.e., without atrophy o severe /detectable white matter hyperintensities). One limitation of previous studies was the application of gross neuroimaging techniques that may not capture subtle cortical changes driving cognitive and behavioural outcomes. DTI has now been proposed to measure both cortical (grey matter) and subcortical (white matter) changes using mean diffusivity (MD) metrics, overcoming former technical difficulties for the study of cortical microstructure. Cortical MD is a measure of cortical microstructure integrity and has proven to be a sensitive tool for subtle cortical changes in early stages of neurodegenerative diseases (24).

However, most of the randomized controlled trials of CR or CCT effects in psychiatric and neurologic conditions use clinical endpoints that may be soaked in subjectivity, or surrogate endpoints based on psychometric tools. Blood and neuroimaging biomarkers may therefore represent a clinically applicable alternative surrogate endpoints that would be cost-effective and minimally invasive so as to provide the neurobiological underpinnings of functional and cognitive remediation response.

STATE-OF-THE-ART: Based on the evidence of unfavourable findings, in 2017 a project was granted for the development of INtegral Cognitive REMediation for Major Depression (INCREM), (PI17/00056, IP: Maria J Portella). This comprehensive functional remediation program includes a traditional CR component with a specialized therapist (based on the compensation model) and a CCT component adapted to the difficulties of each patient. The inclusion of both aspects allows adapting the intervention to the present difficulties by forming new strategies with compensation techniques and promoting translation to everyday life. Therefore, the intervention aims at improving cognitive functioning (beyond a mere training) so as to facilitate the improvement and maintenance of psychosocial functioning for patients with MDD. The details of INCREM program have been published as a protocol (25).

The proof-of-concept revealed very promising findings. Preliminary data was acquired through a randomized clinical trial, which included 3 treatment arms: INCREM (active arm), a psychoeducation program (active comparator arm) and usual treatment (TAU, non-active arm). Such a change in the methodology made it impossible to demonstrate the efficacy of the program, but the pilot study has served to demonstrate the feasibility of INCREM. The results showed that INCREM significantly improved psychosocial functioning in remitted depressed patients soon after the end of the intervention and six months after (26). More than 65% of patients achieved functional recovery. There was also an enhancement of general cognition, providing evidence of the necessity to combine compensatory and drill-and-practice strategies. The acceptability of the interventions (explored through open question to all participants) varies from good to very good. More importantly, this previous study demonstrates the feasibility, safety and benefits of INCREM. The efficacy of the INCREM program with respect to the psychoeducation intervention is now being analysed through a multicentre randomized clinical trial, which was funded by the ISCIII call (PI20/00270, IP: Maria J Portella) and covers different sociodemographic areas. Preliminary findings point towards the confirmation of significant improvement of long-term psychosocial functioning, as well as enhancement of cognitive functioning and of overall patients' well-being. The inclusion of comprehensive data, other than clinical outcomes, should be part of future studies. The integration of clinical, neuroimmuno-oxidative factors and fine neuroimaging markers will improve the study of INCREM outcomes, and therefore, the accuracy and sensitivity of the prediction for this particular treatment response.

The present call offers an exceptional opportunity to continue this innovative and promising line of research started by the PI, in which most of the members of the research team have been involved. This Phase III clinical trial will involve a much larger group of patients and will focus on determining whether INCREM would be safe and effective for a wide variety of patients with depressive disorders. This should confirm and expand the efficacy of INCREM, and more importantly, should help depressed patients with

• Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HDRS_17) [Срок оценки: From enrollment to the end of treatment (12 weeks) and to the end of follow-up (6 months)]
• Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ) [Срок оценки: From enrollment to the end of treatment (12 weeks) and to the end of the follow-up (6 months)]
• Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) [Срок оценки: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (12 weeks) and to the end of the follow-up (6 months)]
• Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression (PDQ-R) [Срок оценки: From enrollment to the end of the intervention (12 weeks) and to the end of follow-up (6 months)]
• Functional and structural brain changes (magnetic resonance imaging) [Срок оценки: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 6 months]