Vital@Work: an Intervention for Prevention of Mental Health Complaints at Work
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Participatory Approach.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Stress. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Нидерланды
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Vital@Work: an Evidence-based Intervention Program for Prevention of Mental Health Complaints at Work, Tailored to Specific Organisational Needs and Contextual Factors
Обзор
The objective of the current study, Vital@Work, is to keep employees in the Netherlands vital on the long term by preventing work-related mental health problems. Therefore, we test an evidence based Participatory Approach (PA) to compose a mental health program tailored to behavioral, organizational \& contextual (BOC) determinants of individuals and populations at risk. The PA is investigated in four different organizations, which differ in sector, size (small and large organizations), type of organization (private or public) and type of work. The varied organizations, each characterized by unique BOC-determinants, provide an opportunity for researching tailored intervention activities that aim to effectively prevent work-related mental health problems. By identifying common factors across these diverse organizations, we aim to grasp patterns of mechanisms for interventions to mental health at work. By doing this, we come closer to opening black box of how and why interventions work and thus closer to tailoring interventions to needs of both individuals and organizations
Подробное описание
This study evaluates the PA as a strategy to implement measures to prevent or reduce work-related mental health problems by a cluster randomized controlled trial, including an intervention and control group. Employees in departments allocated to the intervention group receive the PA intervention in addition to the existing range of preventive mental health measures within the organization. Departments assigned to the control group receive standard practice and therefore only the existing range of preventive interventions will be highlighted and further drawn to the attention of employees (without the PA intervention). Due to the PA intervention and associated activities, it is not possible to blind the researchers and department managers. However, employees in the departments randomized to the intervention or control group are not aware of the research design. Only department managers are informed about the research design and the outcome of randomization, and they are asked not to communicate the research design to the employees.
The PA consists of six steps: 1) preparation: create prerequisites and initiate the PA, 2) risk assessment: analysis of bottlenecks and risks 3) solutions: Analysis of potential solutions 4) action planning: jointly formulating a plan of action to realize solutions 5) implementation: implementing measures by means of the action plan and 6) evaluation: evaluation of the approach.
For each intervention group, a participatory working group will be established, comprising 5-7 employees, a department manager/supervisor, a health and safety coordinator, an HR representative, and a communication specialist. Each intervention group is coordinated by a process facilitator who is responsible for preparing the meetings with the working group and leading the discussions during these sessions. To prepare individuals for this role, the process facilitator receives training, provided by researchers experienced in the PA.
The participative working group will go through steps 2 to 4 of the PA during a day session, resulting in an action plan for the intervention activities to be implemented. Subsequently, this action plan will be implemented throughout the entire team comprising the intervention group. This implementation process will be led by the process facilitator, supported by change agents. Ideally, (some of) the working group members will act as change agents. Change agents have the task of implementing interventions as widely as possible within the department and ensuring a smooth implementation process so that employees actually make use of the innovations. In order to act as catalysts for the implementation process within the department, the change agents and the process facilitator are trained by researchers experienced in the PA. The duration of the entire implementation period is approximately 12 months, but depends on the selected intervention activities, with short-term implementations lasting \< 3 months, and long-term implementations lasting \> 3 months.
Вмешательства
- Другое Participatory Approach
The participatory approach is a stepwise, collaborative approach to the analysis and solvation of bottlenecks that cause stress in employees.
Первичные конечные точки
- Stress [Срок оценки: Baseline - 6 months after baseline - 12 months after baseline]
Вторичные конечные точки (5)
- Work related psychosocial risk factors [Срок оценки: Baseline - 6 months after baseline - 12 months after baseline]
- Sense of community [Срок оценки: Baseline - 6 months after baseline - 12 months after baseline]
- Psychosocial safety climate [Срок оценки: Baseline - 6 months after baseline - 12 months after baseline]
- Presenteeism and absenteeism [Срок оценки: Baseline - 6 months after baseline - 12 months after baseline]
- Implementation outcomes [Срок оценки: Baseline - 6 months after baseline - 12 months after baseline]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Inclusion will be done on cluster level (e.g. team or department), after discussing this with participating organizations. The inclusion criteria for participation in the study comprise being at least 18 years of age, holding an employment contract with the participating organization.
Критерии исключения
- The exclusion criteria include being under 18 years old, not being part of the participating teams/departments, or not having an employment contract with the participating organization.
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Да
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Одна группа
- Маскирование
- Простое слепое
- Основная цель
- Профилактика
Центры проведения
Нидерланды · 4 центра
- Amsterdam UMC — Amsterdam
- GGZ Ingeest — Amsterdam
- Transavia — Amsterdam
- RSO — The Hague
Публикации
- Bouwens L, Anema JR, Juurlink TT, Beekman ATF, Schelvis RMC. Protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial investigating process and effectiveness of a participatory organizational approach for preventing work-related mental health problems among employees: vital@work. BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2970. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24367-8. PMID 40885945
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT06445101 · LSHM22035-H025