Меню
Набор скоро начнётся NCT06375954

EUS-guided CDS vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Borderline Disease (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial)

Без фазы С лечением Malignant Biliary Obstruction Pancreatic Cancer Biliary Tract Neoplasms

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Endoscopic biliary drainage, Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS).
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Malignant Biliary Obstruction, Pancreatic Cancer, Biliary Tract Neoplasms. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Испания
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage With Lumen-Apposing Stent vs Classical ERCP for First-line Therapy of Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction in Borderline Disease: An Open-label, Multicenter Randomized Trial (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial)

Обзор

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate temporal delay (days) between biliary drainage (EUS-CDS vs ERCP as first line therapy) and chemotherapy start in patients with borderline distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Подробное описание

Ecoendoscopy-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) has been extended as a second line treatment in cases of ERCP failure in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, there are clinical trials which have compared it with ERCP as a first line treatment for MDBO in palliative patients, showing similar clinical and technical success and adverse events (AEs) rate between both techniques. Data about the benefit of this techique in borderline patients is still limited.

A recent retrospective study (Janet J et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2023) which included borderline patients, found that EUS-CDS group had significantly less delay (days) between biliary drainage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy start than the ERCP group with fewer endoscopy and surgery AEs.

Thus, our hypothesis is that EUS-CDS has benefits in terms of decreasing delay between biliary drainage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy start when compared to ERCP in MDBO in borderline patients.

Вмешательства

  • Процедура Endoscopic biliary drainage
    Decompression of the bile duct by endoscopic aproach.
  • Устройство Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS)
    Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) deployment: * Covering: Uncovered or Partially Covered. Non covered if gallbladder is present. * Size: 10x40mm or 10x60mm or 10x80mm.
  • Устройство Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS)
    Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) deployment: * LAMS size: 6x8mm or 8x8mm. Consider 10x10mm if bile duct \> 18mm. * DPPS size: 7Fr x 3-7cm.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Delay in days between endoscopic biliary drainage and chemotherapy treatment start [Срок оценки: 1 day to 12 months]
Вторичные конечные точки (5)
  • Technical success [Срок оценки: day 0]
  • Clinical success [Срок оценки: 14 days after BD]
  • AE - biliary drainage [Срок оценки: 0 to 30 days after BD]
  • AE - surgery [Срок оценки: 0 to 90 days after surgery]
  • Delay in days between endoscopic biliary drainage and cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CDP) [Срок оценки: 6 to 12 months]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Malignant distal biliary obstruction diagnosed in patient considered BORDERLINE with biliary drainage indication: i) impaired hepatic enzymes (including hyperbilirubinemia) x3 times upper the superior normal value. ii) Radiologic singns of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction with presence of retrograde dilatation, of at least 12-mm axial diameter.
  • Consensual malignancy by a bilio-pancreatic multidisciplinar committe (histological confirmation is not mandatory)
  • Patient capable of understanding and/or singning the informed consent.
  • Patient who understands the type of study and will comply with all follow-up tests throughout its duration

Критерии исключения

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Severe coagulation disorder: INR > 1.5 non correctable with plasma administration and/or platelet count < 50.000/mm3.
  • Distal malignant biliary strictures in patients considered directly resectable, non-surgical, unresectable, or palliative
  • Benign or uncertain etiology of biliary strictures or strictures located proximally or in close proximity to the hilum.
  • Patients with prior biliary stents or other biliary drainages (e.g., PTCD).
  • Altered intestinal anatomy due to prior surgery that prevents or hinders papillary access (e.g., gastric bypass, Billroth II, duodenal switch, Roux-en-Y).
  • Stenosis in the antral or duodenal region that prevents access to the duodenum and reaching the papilla.
  • Situations that do not allow for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (e.g., esophageal stricture).
  • Patients with functional diversity, who lack the capacity to understand the nature and potential consequences of the study, except when a legal representative is available.
  • Patients incapable of maintaining follow-up appointments (lack of adherence).
  • Lack of informed consent.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Открытое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

Испания · 1 центр
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge — L'Hospitalet de Llobregat

Публикации

  • Teoh AYB, Napoleon B, Kunda R, Arcidiacono PG, Kongkam P, Larghi A, Van der Merwe S, Jacques J, Legros R, Thawee RE, Saxena P, Aerts M, Archibugi L, Chan SM, Fumex F, Kaffes AJ, Ma MTW, Messaoudi N, Rizzatti G, Ng KKC, Ng EKW, Chiu PWY. EUS-Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Using Lumen Apposing Stent Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstr PMID 37121331
  • Janet J, Albouys J, Napoleon B, Jacques J, Mathonnet M, Magne J, Fontaine M, de Ponthaud C, Durand Fontanier S, Bardet SSM, Bourdariat R, Sulpice L, Lesurtel M, Legros R, Truant S, Robin F, Prat F, Palazzo M, Schwarz L, Buc E, Sauvanet A, Gaujoux S, Taibi A. Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Preoperative Biliary Drainage Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus a Transpapilla PMID 37069476
  • Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, Choi JH, Kim SO, Jang S, Kim DU, Shim JH, Song TJ, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage Versus ERCP for the Primary Palliation of Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;113(7):987-997. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8. Epub 2018 Jul 2. PMID 29961772
  • Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better - endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound? Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(2):317-324. doi: 10.1111/den.14186. Epub 2021 Nov 29. PMID 34748675

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT06375954 · CARPEDIEM-2

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗