Меню
Идёт набор NCT06123221

SINUS FLOOR WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR LATERAL WINDOW

Без фазы С лечением Sinus Tract Dental Implant Failed

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Osseodensification with Versah system, Lateral window.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Sinus Tract, Dental Implant Failed. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Бразилия
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

COMPARISON OF IMPLANT INSTALLATION USING THE TRANSCRESTAL APPROACH WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR THE LATERAL WINDOW TECHNIQUE WITH SINUS LIFT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Обзор

This study will compare patient-reported outcomes, as well as the type and incidence of complications, and bone marginal loss after 12 months in implants installed using the transcrestal approach (tSFE) with an osseodensification system (performed according to the protocol by Huwais et al. 2018), or installed simultaneously using the lateral window technique (lSFE) with sinus lift. A blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial will be carried out with individuals over 18 years old, and with single tooth loss in the posterior maxilla, where the residual bone height (RBH) is 3 to 5 mm. The tSFE will be performed with osseodensification burs (Densa Bur, Versah, USA) using a counterclockwise motion, associated to synthetic biomaterial (hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate). The lSFE technique will require the sinus to be filled with the same biomaterial as the group using the other technique, and the antrostomy to be covered with a polydioxanone-based membrane. The patient's post-operatory perceptions will be evaluated by self-administered questionnaires quantifying social and professional isolation, physical appearance, duration and changes in quality of life, eating and speech, diet variations, and sleep deficiency for 2 weeks after the procedure. Pain will be assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS). Immediately after prosthetic rehabilitation, cone beam tomography will be performed. Controls at 6 and 12 months will be performed. In these images, the marginal bone level in relation to a fixed reference point on the implants (upper part of the platform) will be measured mesially and distally in each implant, using a specific program (ImageJ - version 1.49v / NIH software - Bethesda, MD, USA). Generalized estimating equations will be used to compare the two treatments overtime. The significance level used will be 0.05.

Вмешательства

  • Процедура Osseodensification with Versah system
    Access to the bone crest will be performed through a slightly palatinized crestal incision, and a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated. Implant site preparation will be performed according to the bone densification drilling sequence established by the Densah® technique protocol
  • Процедура Lateral window
    A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated. The lateral window will be made with a spherical diamond drill (number 8) at 20,000 rpm. The mesiodistal and apicocoronal dimensions of the lateral access window to the sinus will be measured in all the participants using a caliper. Sinus membrane elevation will be performed with manual instruments.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Pain level [Срок оценки: baseline]
  • Pain level [Срок оценки: day 1]
  • Pain level [Срок оценки: day 2]
  • Pain level [Срок оценки: day 3]
  • Pain level [Срок оценки: day 4]
  • Pain level [Срок оценки: day 7]
  • Pain level [Срок оценки: day 14]
Вторичные конечные точки (12)
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: baseline]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 1]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 2]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 3]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 4]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 5]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 6]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 7]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 8]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 9]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 10]
  • Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg) [Срок оценки: day 11]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Maxillary sinuses that have residual bone height between at least 3 mm and 5 mm;
  • Width of the residual bone ridge that allows the insertion of an implant with a diameter of 4 mm;
  • Tomographic thickness of Schneider's membrane with a maximum of 5 mm in the region to be operated;
  • Residual ridge with ≥2 mm of medullary bone in the bucco-palatal direction, with a 1/1 ratio of medullary and cortical bone to achieve predictable plastic expansion;
  • Patients with adequate interarch space for placement of the prosthetic crown;
  • Good physical health status (ASA1 and ASA2, according to the Physical Status Classification System - American Society of Anesthesiologists);
  • At least 6 months since the last tooth loss in the region to be operated;

Критерии исключения

  • \- Those with sinus pathology;
  • Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes a day);
  • Those with a history of head and neck radiotherapy;
  • Those who have already undergone bone augmentation in any of the targeted surgical areas;
  • Immunodeficiency of any nature;
  • Emotional instability and psychiatric problems;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Current use of oral bisphosphonates or history of using injectable bisphosphonate;
  • Patients with active periodontitis defined by the presence of subgingival bleeding greater than 10%;
  • Documented allergy to drugs or dental materials involved in the experimental protocol.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Простое слепое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

Бразилия · 1 центр
  • Alex Haas — Porto Alegre

Публикации

  • Farina R, Franceschetti G, Travaglini D, Consolo U, Minenna L, Schincaglia GP, Riccardi O, Bandieri A, Maietti E, Trombelli L. Morbidity following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: A randomized trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Sep;45(9):1128-1139. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12985. Epub 2018 Aug 3. PMID 29992594
  • Huwais S, Mazor Z, Ioannou AL, Gluckman H, Neiva R. A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study with Up-to-5-Year Follow-up Utilizing a Method that Enhances Bone Density and Allows for Transcrestal Sinus Augmentation Through Compaction Grafting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):1305-1311. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6770. PMID 30427961
  • Starch-Jensen T, Jensen JD. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Review of Selected Treatment Modalities. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2017 Sep 30;8(3):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2017.8303. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep. PMID 29142655
  • Franceschetti G, Rizzi A, Minenna L, Pramstraller M, Trombelli L, Farina R. Patient-reported outcomes of implant placement performed concomitantly with transcrestal sinus floor elevation or entirely in native bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb;28(2):156-162. doi: 10.1111/clr.12774. Epub 2016 Jan 8. PMID 26749535
  • Bacevic M, Compeyron Y, Lecloux G, Rompen E, Lambert F. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of sinus floor elevation using the lateral window technique versus the hydrodynamic transalveolar approach: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Sep;25(9):5391-5401. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03847-2. Epub 2021 Mar 10. PMID 33694027
  • Starch-Jensen T, Bruun NH. Patient's perception of recovery after osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss collagen compared with no grafting material: a randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Mar 22;7(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00302-5. PMID 33748923
  • Pikos MA, Miron RJ. To Drill or to Densify? Clinical Indications for the Use of Osseodensification. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2019 May;40(5):276-281; quiz 282. PMID 31067068
  • Huwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):27-36. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4817. Epub 2016 Oct 14. PMID 27741329

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT06123221 · UFRGS-Cuiaba

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗