Sensory and Cognitive Outcomes of Robotic Exercises in Stroke (SCORES)
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Robotic Rehabilitation of the upper limb, Conventional Rehabilitation of the upper limb.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Stroke. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 85 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Италия
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation on Sensory and Cognitive Impairments in Subjects With Stroke. The SCORES (Sensory and Cognitive Outcomes of Robotic Exercises in Stroke) Study.
Обзор
Based on the findings of meta-analyses, upper limb robotic rehabilitation has shown to enhance daily living activities, motor function, and strength in stroke patients. However, when compared to traditional methods, recent randomized controlled trials conducted on larger participant groups failed to identify significant differences in motor-related outcomes between the two approaches. In addition to motor deficits, stroke survivors often experience cognitive decline and sensory disturbances, which can significantly impede their recovery process. The introduction of multisensory stimulation and an enriched environment through robotic interventions may offer valuable supplementary treatments in these specific areas. Nevertheless, this aspect of treatment has not been thoroughly explored. This study seeks to assess the effectiveness of upper limb robotic rehabilitation in individuals recovering from subacute strokes, in comparison to conventional treatments. Specifically, it aims to determine whether this robotic therapy can lead to improvements in (a) cognitive deficits, (b) somatosensory impairment, and (c) how these sensory and cognitive deficits influence the process of motor recovery.
Подробное описание
The study aims to investigate whether an upper limb robotic treatment could have a greater impact than a conventional approach on specific cognitive domains in patients with stroke, as well as in restoring the somatosensory impairment in patients with stroke.
For this aim, 126 consecutive subjects with stroke in the sub-acute phase (within 6 months after stroke) will be enrolled and randomized to either the robotic (RG) or the conventional group (CG). The sample size was calculated by means of a 2- sided, 2-sample t-test assuming: 80% power; type I error of 0.05; a mean difference of 2.15 units on the MoCA, a common standard deviation of 3.77 points (Wu 2019). Considering a dropout rate of 20%, the final sample size required was estimated to be 126 subjects.
Randomization will be stratified according to a cut-off of 18.28 on the MoCA demographically adjusted total score (inner confidence limit of the 5th centile of the normal population) indicating a borderline performance, to ensure that the subjects' characteristics in each group will be closely matched. In the RG, patients will undergo robotic therapy, while a conventional approach will be used in the CG. The rehabilitation treatments, either robotic or conventional, will be performed daily for 45 minutes, 5 days/week, for a total of 30 sessions. Patients in the RG will be treated using a set of devices that allow bi- and three-dimensional movements of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers (Aprile et al, 2019). Motor and cognitive tasks, carefully selected among those available, will be performed during the treatment, following a protocol already proposed in a previous pilot study (Aprile et al, 2021). Visual and auditory feedback will be provided to help the patients. In the RG, treatment will focus on reprogramming sensorimotor function, hypertonus inhibition, and functional improvement. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (T0), the end of the rehabilitation protocol (T1), and a 6-month follow-up (T2).
Вмешательства
- Другое Robotic Rehabilitation of the upper limb
Upper limb rehabilitation using a set of 4 devices. A set of motor/cognitive exercises will be selected to train also attention, memory, executive function, speed of processing, and visuospatial abilities.The following devices will be used: (a) a robotic device that allows passive, active, and active-assistive planar movements of the shoulder and elbow joints (Motore, Humanware); (b) a robotic device that allows passive, active, and active-assistive finger flexion and extension movements (Amadeo - Другое Conventional Rehabilitation of the upper limb
Upper limb rehabilitation using conventional techniques, focused on upper limb reprogramming sensorimotor function, hypertonus, inhibition and functional improvement. The rehabilitation treatment will be performed daily for 45 minutes, 5 days/week, for a total of 30 sessions.
Первичные конечные точки
- Changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention]
Вторичные конечные точки (12)
- Changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Symbol Digit Modalities Test [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Tower of London [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Visual search test [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (motor score) [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Thumb Localizing Test [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Semmes Weinstein filament test [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (sensation score) [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Box and Block test [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Motricity Index [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
- Changes in Modified Barthel Index [Срок оценки: Baseline, up to 7 days after the enrollment; up to 3 days after the intervention; 6 months after the end of the intervention]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- a single event, verified by MRI or CT;
- age between 18 and 85 years;
- time since stroke within six months;
- a demographically adjusted total score of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) between 15.5 and 22.23
Критерии исключения
- behavioural and cognitive disorders and/or reduced compliance that would interfere with active therapy;
- fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb that would interfere with active therapy (ankylosis, Modified Ashworth Scale = 4);
- severe deficits in visual acuity.
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Двойное слепое
- Основная цель
- Лечение
Центры проведения
Италия · 3 центра
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi — Florence
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo — Messina
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - Centro Santa Maria della Provvidenza — Roma
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT06109324 · SCORES_clinicalstudy