Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: experimental group: intensive motor training, usual care.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Spinal Cord Injuries. Базовые параметры: 16 лет — 90 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Бельгия, Нидерланды
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Central and Peripheral Neuroplasticity in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Following Intensive Upper Limb Motor Training
Обзор
After spinal cord injury (SCI), there is a disruption in neural circuits resulting in paralysis. There is not yet a cure for paralysis. In persons with Cervical SCI (pwC-SCI) recovery of arm-hand function is very important as it has a significant impact on the patients' level of independence and quality of life. Recovery is assumed to involve alterations in both central and peripheral motor systems. Motor training at an intensive dosage potentially provides a powerful stimulus for neurological recovery. This project exploits the peripheral and central neuroplastic effect of an early (\<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours in addition to usual care) upper limb motor training program (EIUMT) directed at recovery below the level of the injury in pwC-SCI within an international multi-center randomized controlled trial including 44 pwC-SCI. It has 4 objectives: to investigate 1)central neural plasticity by identifying alterations in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2)peripheral neural plasticity by identifying alterations in axonal excitability and number of motor units; 3)behavioral motor recovery of upper limb and 4)relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and behavioral and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Cutting-edge neurophysiological measures are used to provide insight in the mechanism of neuroplasticity after EIUMT and will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6 months follow-up.
Подробное описание
Background of the study:
Paralysis or paralysis is the most common effect of spinal cord injury (SCI) on individuals. Paralysis affects the ability to walk, perform self-care, live independently and participate in work and leisure activities. In individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, arm and hand function is very important. The most promising and easily implemented intervention that could promote neurological recovery and make a lasting difference in the lives of people with spinal cord injuries is early and intensive motor training aimed at recovery below the injury level. This intervention takes advantage of the early plasticity of the nervous system. By maximizing muscle activation in the first few weeks after injury, we can target the nervous system's unique capacity for neural plasticity where changes can occur in central and peripheral motor systems.
Objective of the study:
This project aims to investigate peripheral and central neuroplasticity following an early (\<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours of additional therapy) upper extremity motor training program (EIUMT) aimed at recovery below the lesion level. This project has 4 objectives: to investigate 1) central neural plasticity (identify changes in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2) peripheral neural plasticity (identify change in axonal excitability and number of motor units); 3) clinical motor recovery of the upper limbs and 4) relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Advanced neurophysiological measurements and clinical measurements will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6-month follow-up.
Study design:
a multicenter pragmatic randomised controlled study in 2 countries
Study population:
44 persons with cervical spinal cord injury (22 participants in the control and intervention groups) Inclusion criteria: Individuals are eligible to participate if they have suffered a traumatic or non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury within the previous 13 weeks, have AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) A lesion with motor function more than three levels below motor level (on one or both sides) or have AIS C or AIS D lesion (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury), are older than 16 years of age, have received permission to begin rehabilitation and are likely to remain an inpatient for the next 8 weeks.
Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded if they have a significant medical or physical condition or psychiatric illness that could prevent the person from participating in the study or would place the person at unacceptable risk if they were to participate.
Intervention:
The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.
The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study (Baseline vs 8 weeks after randomisation):
Central plasticity via: Single pulse TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) (Resting Motor Threshold) Peripheral plasticity via: Peripheral nerve assessment (Compound muscle action potential (CMAP)) Functional recovery via: Grades redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:
Clinical Measures: Upper Extremity Motor Score, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SClM-selfcare); Van Lieshout Test (VLT); Hand-Held Dynamometry; accelerometry (session density: active therapy time/session length); perceived difficulty and exertion) Central plasticity: Single Pulse TMS: Stimulus-Response Function, Cortical mapping, Paired pulse TMS: SICI (short interval intracortical inhibition); LICI (long interval intracortical inhibition) Peripheral plasticity: NET (Nerve excitability testing) and MScanFit MUNE.
Вмешательства
- Другое experimental group: intensive motor training
Intervention group: receive an extra 6 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 8 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stim - Другое usual care
usual rehabilitation
Первичные конечные точки
- changes in single pulse TMS: resting motor threshold [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- Changes in Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in GRASSP [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
Вторичные конечные точки (11)
- Single-pulse TMS: Stimulus Response Curve [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes SICI [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in LICI [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in MscanFit MUNE [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in single pulse TMS: mapping [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in NET (Nerve excitability testing) [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in behavioral measures: Upper extremity motor score [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in Spinal Cord independence Measures [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in Van Lieshout Test [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- changes in hand held dynamometry [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
- Goal satisfaction [Срок оценки: - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Traumatic or non-traumatic C-SCI in the preceding 13 weeks; age over 16 years; have an incomplete SCI categorized as AIS C or D or an AIS A SCI with zones of partial motor paralysis (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCI) and medically stable.
Критерии исключения
- SCI with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A without zones of partial preservation (decided based on former studies) and expertise of the team; SCI with any significant medical condition that could prevent the person from participating. Patients will be excluded from the measures of central plasticity in the presence of contraindications for TMS application such as epilepsy, metal implants in the brain, defibrillator, pacemaker, and pregnancy
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Простое слепое
- Основная цель
- Лечение
Центры проведения
Бельгия · 3 центра
- Revalidatieziekenhuis RevArte — Antwerp
- UZGent — Ghent
- UZLeuven Campus Pellenberg — Leuven
Нидерланды · 1 центр
- Zorggroep Adelante — Hoensbroek
Публикации
- Hrycyk IJ, Bertels N, Tankisi H, Glinsky JV, Oostra K, van Laake-Geelen C, Tedesco Triccas L, Spooren A. Central and peripheral neuroplasticity in cervical spinal cord injury following intensive upper limb motor training: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2026 Mar 18;16(3):e107352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107352. PMID 41857841
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT06065384 · REPAIR-SCI_UH