Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Rendezvous Versus Precut Papillotomy

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the preferred therapeutic modality over surgery or interventional radiology procedures in many common benign or malignant pancreatobiliary diseases in modern clinical practice, but selective bile duct cannulation may fail in up to 15% of cases.

The implication of failed endoscopic biliary access can be substantial for the following reasons: higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), need for rescue procedures such as external biliary drainage by interventional radiology, risks of external biliary drainage catheter-related complications including catheter blockage.

Advanced ERCP cannulation techniques such as pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation with or without pancreatic stenting, and precut papillotomy are recommended by guidelines in patients with difficult bile duct cannulation, but they are not without limitations. If pancreatic duct cannulation is not feasible or pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation fails, precut papillotomy using 1 of the 3 accepted precut techniques: 1) conventional precut papillotomy by needle knife, 2) precut fistulotomy by needle knife, or 3) transpancreatic precut papillotomy by papillotome, can be performed depending on institutional expertise. Despite a higher biliary cannulation success by precut papillotomy when compared to pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation, a higher risk of PEP has also been traditionally associated with precut papillotomy when it is performed after prolonged cannulation attempts. On the other hand, there has been growing evidence to suggest the increased risk of PEP may be related to the persistent cannulation attempts before precut rather than the precut papillotomy itself. In a recent meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials comparing "early precut papillotomy" to persistent standard cannulation techniques in ERCP by attending endoscopists and advanced endoscopy trainees, the incidence of PEP was not significantly different between the "early precut papillotomy" and the persistent standard cannulation groups.

EUS-guided rendezvous technique (EUS RV) is a novel advanced interventional EUS technique that has been increasingly performed in tertiary centers for patients with failed biliary access by advanced ERCP cannulation techniques. Several variations of EUS-guided biliary drainage procedures have been described including transpapillary drainage procedures (EUS RV for biliary access, EUS-guided antegrade stenting) and transmural drainage procedures (EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy). EUS RV can be applied in both benign and malignant biliary conditions as a salvage technique for difficult biliary access when the major papilla is accessible. EUS RV involves the following key steps: access of the dilated bile duct by a EUS needle under EUS guidance, performance of cholangiogram, advancement of the rendezvous guidewire into the bile duct and out of the major papilla into duodenum, and exchange of echoendoscope back to a duodenoscope to complete the procedure by retrieving the rendezvous guidewire into the duodenoscope or by cannulation alongside the rendezvous guidewire. Because EUS RV achieves biliary access by targeting the dilated bile duct with antegrade passage of guidewire from bile duct through the papillary orifice, theoretically this would carry a lower risk of procedure-related PEP when compared to early precut papillotomy.

In a recently published consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures proposed by experts from our endoscopy research group and other member institutions of the Asian EUS Group, EUS-guided biliary drainage is recommended as the procedure of choice for biliary drainage in patients with failed ERCP when expertise is available based on high level evidence. The technical success of EUS RV has increased over time to 73% to 100% in studies published after 2012.

Studies directly comparing EUS RV and precut papillotomy in patients with difficult biliary access remain scarce. In a single center retrospective study published in 2012 comparing the clinical outcomes of 58 EUS RV procedures and 144 precut papillotomy procedures in patients with failed bile duct cannulation in ERCP, Dhir V et al reported a significantly higher first session technical success of biliary access (98% vs 90%, p = 0.038) and a lower adverse event rate (3.4% vs 6.9%, p = 0.27) in the EUS RV group. In a multicenter retrospective study published in 2017 by Lee A et al comparing the clinical outcomes of 50 EUS RV + 11 EUS-guided transmural drainage procedures and 142 precut papillotomy procedures in patients with failed bile duct cannulation in ERCP, a higher technical success of biliary access (94% vs 75%) was also demonstrated in the EUS RV group.

Despite the promising results of EUS RV in patients with failed biliary cannulation by advanced ERCP techniques, there has been no dedicated randomized controlled trial directly comparing EUS RV and early precut papillotomy in patients with difficult bile duct cannulation. We aim to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy of these 2 advanced endoscopic biliary access techniques in patients with difficult bile duct cannulation in ERCP.

• Procedure-related serious adverse events in the EUS-guided rendezvous group and the early precut papillotomy group within 30 days of ERCP [Срок оценки: From day of procedure to Day 30 after procedure]
• Procedure time to achieve biliary access by the assigned study biliary access technique [Срок оценки: Intra-procedure, during ERCP]
• Need for rescue biliary drainage procedures in patients with failed biliary access by the assigned study technique, including crossover to the other study biliary access technique, need for PTBD by interventional radiology [Срок оценки: Intra-procedure (during ERCP) and 3 days post procedure]