Меню
Идёт набор NCT05990348

Estimation of the Diaphragm Electrical Activity and Intercostal Thickening Fraction During Different Pattern of Mechanical Ventilation: PSV Versus NAVA

Наблюдательное Respiratory Failure Weaning Failure

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: difficult weaning patients.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Respiratory Failure, Weaning Failure. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Италия
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →

Обзор

the introduction of new MV modalities has shown promising results in reducing the incidence of weaning failure, mainly due to a more physiologic approach which allows respiratory muscle preservation. Among them, the Neurally Adjust Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) seemed to be associated with lower incidence of weaning failure and subsequent duration of mechanical ventilation, compared to standard modalities like the Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) . Moreover, NAVA allows the evaluation of the diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi), an index of diaphragmatic neural respiratory drive. However, no study has compared TFic values during PSV and NAVA modalities in patients with difficult weaning from MV admitted in ICU.

Подробное описание

Respiratory muscles dysfunction is one of the main causes leading to failure of weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) in critically ill patients. Muscular activity is important during the inspiratory phase of ventilation, which is mainly due to diaphragm and external intercostal muscles. Diaphragm dysfunction is frequent among critically ill patients and ranges from 33 to 95% . Although several indexes have been investigated to help clinician in identifying its disturbance, their clinical value is controversial . External intercostal muscles dysfunction epidemiology is unknown because of lack of non-invasive tool to investigate such condition. However, the echography assessment of intercostal muscles thickening fraction (TFic) has shown promising results in this field as a non-invasive tool to assess inspiratory muscle function and predict weaning failure .

On the other hand, the introduction of new MV modalities has shown promising results in reducing the incidence of weaning failure, mainly due to a more physiologic approach which allows respiratory muscle preservation. Among them, the Neurally Adjust Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) seemed to be associated with lower incidence of weaning failure and subsequent duration of mechanical ventilation, compared to standard modalities like the Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) \[. Moreover, NAVA allows the evaluation of the diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi), an index of diaphragmatic neural respiratory drive . A recent study suggests that EAdi and derived parameters, may be helpful to predict weaning failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients .

However, no study has compared TFic values during PSV and NAVA modalities in patients with difficult weaning from MV admitted in ICU.

the aim of this study will be the comparison of TFic values during PSV and NAVA modalities in patients with difficult weaning from MV admitted in ICU and the assessment of the inspiratory effort parameters and the occurrence of respiratory asynchrony in patients with difficult weaning from MV admitted in ICU.

Вмешательства

  • Другое difficult weaning patients
    intercostal thickening fraction values during PSV and NAVA modalities in patients with difficult weaning from MV admitted in ICU.

Первичные конечные точки

  • intercostal thickening fraction [Срок оценки: From date of enrollment until the date of extubation (up to seven days)]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • patients who have failed at least one weaning attempt
  • mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours

Критерии исключения

  • Pregnancy
  • Obesity (Body Mass Index > 35 kg/m2)
  • Contraindication to the insert of a nasogastric tube
  • Neuromuscular diseases

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Модель наблюдения
Случай-кроссовер

Центры проведения

Италия · 1 центр
  • Giorgia Spinazzola — Rome

Публикации

  • Abdelwahed WM, Abd Elghafar MS, Amr YM, Alsherif SEI, Eltomey MA. Prospective study: Diaphragmatic thickness as a predictor index for weaning from mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2019 Aug;52:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 15. No abstract available. PMID 30904733
  • Spadaro S, Grasso S, Mauri T, Dalla Corte F, Alvisi V, Ragazzi R, Cricca V, Biondi G, Di Mussi R, Marangoni E, Volta CA. Can diaphragmatic ultrasonography performed during the T-tube trial predict weaning failure? The role of diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index. Crit Care. 2016 Sep 28;20(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1479-y. PMID 27677861
  • Goligher EC, Dres M, Patel BK, Sahetya SK, Beitler JR, Telias I, Yoshida T, Vaporidi K, Grieco DL, Schepens T, Grasselli G, Spadaro S, Dianti J, Amato M, Bellani G, Demoule A, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Georgopoulos D, Guerin C, Khemani RG, Laghi F, Mercat A, Mojoli F, Ottenheijm CAC, Jaber S, Heunks L, Mancebo J, Mauri T, Pesenti A, Brochard L. Lung- and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation. Am J Respir Cri PMID 32516052
  • Schmidt M, Kindler F, Cecchini J, Poitou T, Morawiec E, Persichini R, Similowski T, Demoule A. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and proportional assist ventilation both improve patient-ventilator interaction. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 25;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0763-6. PMID 25879592

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT05990348 · 4856

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗