Postextubation Use of Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Severely Obese Patients
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Noninvasive ventilation alternating with high flow nasal cannula, High flow nasal cannula.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Obesity, Morbid, Extubation Failure. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- США, Мексика
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Postextubation Use of Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Severely Obese Patients
Обзор
Around 20% of the obese patients with higher body mass index (BMI) who are taken off the breathing tube and breathing machine (ventilator) end up needing it back to support breathing. The re-application of breathing tube is associated with poor outcomes, including high risk of pneumonia, longer hospital stays, and death. The purpose of this study is to assess if prophylactic use of noninvasive breathing support after removing the breathing tube lowers the chance of needing the breathing tube again.
Подробное описание
Patients with obesity are at risk of developing respiratory failure due to reduced lung volumes and chest wall compliance. Obesity is one of the easily identifiable, contributing factors of extubation failure that often leads to prolonged mechanical ventilation use and ICU stay. The early application of noninvasive respiratory support, especially NIV, has been shown to reduce reintubation rates in obese patients in a small, non-randomized study. However, prolonged use of NIV is often associated with decreased patient compliance and increased incidence of skin breakdown. HFNC is a noninvasive strategy that is comfortable, uses a nasal cannula and provides a high flow rate to meet the patient's inspiratory flow demand and thereby reduce work of breathing.
The purpose of this RCT will be to determine the effects of using NIV alternating with HFNC for reducing the treatment failure rate compared with HFNC alone in extubated patients with severe obesity. We hypothesize that early, prophylactic use of NIV alternating with HFNC will decrease the risk of respiratory failure (treatment failure) in severely obese patients.
Вмешательства
- Устройство Noninvasive ventilation alternating with high flow nasal cannula
A total of 24 hours of prophylactic respiratory support will be provided using NIV alternating with HFNC with total NIV usage of 16 hours and HFNC usage of 8 hours. - Устройство High flow nasal cannula
A total of 24 hours of prophylactic respiratory support will be provided using HFNC alone.
Первичные конечные точки
- Treatment failure defined by use of rescue respiratory support for acute respiratory failure in the first 72 hours after planned extubation [Срок оценки: 72 hours]
Вторичные конечные точки (1)
- Reintubation rate [Срок оценки: 7 days]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Adult, age ≥ 18 years old
- Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥24 hours
- BMI ≥40 kg/m2
- Undergoing planned extubation per treating team
- Arterial pH ≥7.35 or venous pH ≥ 7.31 within 30 mins of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)
Критерии исключения
- Pregnant
- Use of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation
- Chronic tracheostomy in place
- Unplanned or accidental extubation
- Terminal/compassionate extubation
- Contraindication to NIV use
- Intubated because of an acute exacerbation of COPD
- Underlying neuromuscular disease
- No reintubation requested by patient/family
- Documented/known history of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure on home NIV (including bilevel PAP).
- Enrolled in any other outcome study
- Treating clinician feels that HFNC or NIV are either mandatory or contraindicated for a given patient
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Открытое
- Основная цель
- Профилактика
Центры проведения
США · 4 центра
- Rush University Medical Center — Chicago
- Central DuPage Hospital — Winfield
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center — Houston
- Medical College of Wisconsin — Milwaukee
Мексика · 1 центр
- Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde — Guadalajara
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT05918575 · 23050803