Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Coracoid Transfer, Distal Tibia Allograft with Bankart repair.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Shoulder Dislocation, Bone Loss, Arthroscopy. Базовые параметры: 16 лет — 40 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Канада
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction for Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss: a Prospective Multi-centre Randomized Trial
Обзор
Anterior shoulder dislocations occur when the humeral head translates anterior to the glenoid cause pain, stiffness, and glenoid bone loss. If left untreated, the risk of recurrence can be up to or greater than 90%. The only surgically modifiable factor to reduce the risk of recurrence is the glenoid bone loss (GBL), where surgeons have the ability to recreate the shape of the glenoid and reduce the risk of recurrent shoulder dislocations. Established boney procedures for shoulder instability include the Latarjet and free bone block procedures, such as the Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AGR). The Latarjet is well known for its lower rate of recurrent instability, but raises concerns due to under-appreciated complications rates. The AGR is a newer surgical approach that has garnered attention for its low rate of recurrent instability and complication profile. Both treatments can reduce pain, increase function following surgery and reduce the risk of recurrent instability. However, these two established approaches have yet to be directly compared and studied on a larger scale. The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes pre- and post-operatively between the Latarjet to the AGR.
Подробное описание
Anterior shoulder dislocations are painful and highly prevalent. If left untreated, rates of recurrence can be up to and greater than 90%. The risk of recurrence room is increased with younger age (\< 40), male sex, hyperlaxity, participation in contact sports, and GBL. From these factors, GBL is the only modifiable factor and surgical intervention is required. Managing the bone deficiency for instances of shoulder instability has proven to be a surgical challenge.
Established boney procedures for shoulder instability include the open and arthroscopic Latarjet and open and arthroscopic free bone block interventions. Latarjet is considered the gold standard for treating anterior shoulder instability with bone loss, where the coracoid process is cut and transferred with the conjoin tendon through the subscapularis. The coracoid process is then fixed to the anterior glenoid increasing glenohumeral surface area and stability by the addition of the sling effect. Latarjet has proven to result in low recurrent instability but raises concerns due to underappreciated complication rates (15-30%). The arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction (AGR) with distal tibia allograft is an arthroscopic bone block procedure that has recently garnered attention for its low rate of recurrent instability and complications, high levels of patient satisfaction and avoidance of splitting the subscapularis tendon. AGR with a distal tibia uses a new far medial portal, (i.e., Halifax portal) to avoid damaging the neurovascular or musculature while allowing for anatomic repair of the glenoid.
This randomized control trial will compare the gold standard Latarjet to the AGR. This study aims to randomize 68 individuals who experience anterior shoulder instability with GBL. Through a series of clinical and radiographic outcome measures, the study investigators hypothesize the AGR group will demonstrate smaller complication rates, but remain a similar post-operative recurrence rate, and patient reported outcomes. This trial will be the first multi-centre control trial evaluating the Latarjet to the AGR for patients with critical bone loss (\>20%). This research has the potential to demonstrate clinical efficacy of a procedure that is safer, more anatomic, with less damage to the subscapular muscle, and an easier revision surgery.
Вмешательства
- Процедура Coracoid Transfer
For patients randomized to the active comparator group, the coracoid process and conjoined tendon will be cut and transferred to the anterior rim of the glenoid through an incision in the subscapularis muscle. - Процедура Distal Tibia Allograft with Bankart repair
For the experimental group, a distal tibia allograft will be prepped, cut (20mm x 10mm x 15mm), and inserted into the anterior aspect of the shoulder through a far medial portal. The distal tibia allograft will be attached to the anterior glenoid using cannulated screws. A soft tissue repair, Bankart repair, is performed above the graft.
Первичные конечные точки
- Complication reporting [Срок оценки: 2 years]
Вторичные конечные точки (7)
- Recurrent Instability [Срок оценки: 2 years]
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Assessment Form [Срок оценки: 1 and 2 years]
- Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index [Срок оценки: 1 and 2 years]
- EQ5D-5L [Срок оценки: 1 and 2 years]
- Radiographic measure - subscapularis muscle volume [Срок оценки: 1 year]
- Radiographic measure - graft resorption [Срок оценки: 1 year]
- Radiographic measure - glenoid size [Срок оценки: 1 year]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Patients with one or more instances of anterior shoulder dislocation; pre-operative CT scan illustrating >20% bone loss.
Критерии исключения
- posterior shoulder instability; multidirectional shoulder instability; massive rotator cuff teats (MRI proven); history of substance abuse, patients unable to provide informed consent, patients refusing randomization.
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Да
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Простое слепое
- Основная цель
- Лечение
Центры проведения
Канада · 1 центр
- Nova Scotia Health QEII Halifax Infirmary — Halifax
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT05658289 · LatarjetAGR