TEAMS R34 #1 After-Action Reviews in Child Welfare Services
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: After-Action Review.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Mental Health Issue, Children, Adult. Базовые параметры: от 6 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- США
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Обзор
This project proposes to improve successful mental health service linkage in Child Welfare Services (CWS) by adapting and testing the After Action Review (AAR) team effectiveness intervention to augment the Child Family Team (CFT) services intervention. Despite being both required and a collaborative approach to service planning, CFT meetings are implemented with questionable fidelity and consistency, rarely including children and families as intended. By inclusion of child and family voice, the AAR-enhanced CFT should lead to increased fidelity to the CFT intervention and greater levels of parental satisfaction with the service and shared decision-making, thus resulting in enhanced follow-through with Action Plans and linkage to mental health care for children.
Подробное описание
The proposed project will address the following aims:
Aim 1. Conduct a qualitative needs assessment targeting the ongoing implementation of the CFT services intervention in a large, publicly funded, CWS. A qualitative inquiry consisting of interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders will result in the preparation of an action plan to address identified gaps between the current and desired CFT services intervention outcomes.
Aim 2. Adapt and tailor the AAR implementation strategy to address the CFT services intervention needs.
Aim 3. Assess mechanisms of the AAR team effectiveness intervention for CFT implementation.
Вмешательства
- Поведенческое After-Action Review
After-action reviews, or debriefs, are a relatively simple, inexpensive, and quick, tool to improve learning, performance, and the effectiveness of teams and individuals. After-action reviews are active self-learning processes wherein participants reflect on specific performance episode to actively engage in self-discovery and improve learning in a non-punitive/non-judgmental manner to result in enhanced performance. This proposal aims to apply the team effectiveness intervention of the after-ac
Первичные конечные точки
- Collaboration & Satisfaction About Care Decisions (CSACD) [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- San Diego (SD) County Behavioral Health Administrative Data [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- Mathieu Team Processes Scale [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
Вторичные конечные точки (7)
- Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Intervention Measure [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- Participant demographics professional characteristics [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- Card-Sorting Task [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- McAllister Affect-Based Trust [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- Psychological Safety [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- State-Wide CFT Fidelity Tool [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
- Knoll and Van Dick Silence Measure [Срок оценки: through study completion, ~9 months]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
Inclusion Criteria for CWS leaders and/or caseworkers
- (For leaders) Employed as one of several CWS leadership positions: CWS Director, CWS Deputy Director, CWS Regional Manager; (For caseworkers) Employed as a caseworker in one of the two participating regions for the proposed study.
- Plans to remain employed for at least six months beyond study initiation
- Speaks English or Spanish
Inclusion Criteria for formal and informal CFT members
- Member of CFT with one of the participating CWS caseworkers. CFT members can include mental health services provider, Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA), educational representative, and other supports
- Speaks English or Spanish
Inclusion Criteria for parents/caregivers with active CWS cases
- Parent/caregiver of child aged 6-17 with an open CWS case
- Initial CFT meeting for open CWS case has not yet been held (Aim 3)
- Speaks English or Spanish
Inclusion Criteria for children with active CWS cases (for mental health service linkage data extraction only\*)
- Child aged 6-17 with an open CWS case
- Mental health services need/s (identified by the CWS caseworker via CANS screening in advance of the initial CFT meeting, during which consensus is reached regarding the Action Plan and service referral)
Критерии исключения
Individuals who do not meet inclusion criteria are not eligible to participate in this study.
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Открытое
- Основная цель
- Организация здравоохранения
Центры проведения
США · 1 центр
- UC San Diego - IN STEP Children's Mental Health Research Center — San Diego
Публикации
- Sklar M, Kenneally R, Aarons GA, Fettes DL. Applying after-action reviews to child and family teams to improve mental health service linkage within child welfare services: a study protocol. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Oct 5;4(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00479-3. PMID 37798808
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT05629013 · 803821 · P50MH126231-01A1