Меню
Набор по приглашению NCT05627674

Precision Prevention Strategy to Increase Uptake and Engagement in Lung Cancer Screening and Smoking Cessation Treatment

Без фазы С лечением Smoking Smoking Cessation Tobacco Use Cessation

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Usual Care, RiskProfile-Clin, RiskProfile-Gen.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Use Cessation. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
США
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Precision Approaches to Lung Cancer Screening and Smoking Cessation Treatment in Primary Care

Обзор

This trial tests the effects of two versions of RiskProfile, a clinically-informed and a genetically-informed version of a patient-specific risk feedback tool, in comparison to usual care, on lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment. The trial assesses the multilevel effects of these precision risk feedback tools on the likelihood of clinicians to order lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment and of their patients to utilize these cancer prevention interventions.

Подробное описание

The overarching goal of this study is to test the impact of a precision risk feedback tool aiming to address gaps in clinician and patient uptake of lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment. This study builds on evidence that (1) clinical and genetic factors may inform precision risk on lung cancer and smoking cessation and (2) increasingly high demand for personal genetic risk in particular may signal its potential to activate behavior change. The multi-level precision prevention intervention to be tested--RiskProfile-- provides the opportunity to present personalized clinical and genetic information to increase clinician ordering and patient uptake of screening and treatment recommendations. This study aims to understand the relative benefit of a clinically-informed RiskProfile (based on clinical factors) over usual care, and the additional benefit of a genetically-informed RiskProfile (based on clinical and genetic factors) over the other intervention arms. Therefore, the investigators propose a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial of 141 clinicians and 705 screen-eligible patients from a diverse primary care setting (62% African American). Clinicians and patients will be randomized with 1:1:1 allocation to usual care vs. clinically-informed RiskProfile vs. genetically-informed RiskProfile to evaluate the effect of precision prevention interventions on screening and treatment. In Aim 1, the investigators will test the effect of RiskProfile on clinician orders for lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment. In Aim 2, the investigators will test the effect of RiskProfile on patient uptake of lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to usual care, the outcomes of clinician ordering and patient receipt of screening and treatment will be higher in both RiskProfile groups and will be highest in the genetically-informed RiskProfile group. In Aim 3, the investigators will examine the effects of RiskProfile on potential mechanisms that may lead to increased uptake of lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment. The investigators hypothesize that RiskProfile will impact clinician perceptions about lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment that will, in turn, increase ordering behaviors. The investigators further hypothesize that these increases in clinician ordering, combined with changes in patient-level social-cognitive and engagement mechanisms, will increase lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment use among patients. The investigators will assess outcomes at enrollment (at the initial intervention visit), and at 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month post-intervention follow-ups. Primary outcomes include clinician ordering and patient completion of lung cancer screening. Secondary outcomes include clinician prescribing and patient use of tobacco treatment, patient progress toward smoking cessation, and patient ongoing adherence to lung cancer screening. Mechanistic outcomes include patient social-cognitive and engagement factors, clinician perceptions about lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment, and clinician-patient interactions at the primary care visit. To better understand potential mechanistic influences of RiskProfile, the investigators will conduct qualitative semi-structured interviews with a subset of clinicians and patients, focused on decision-making processes as well as implementation barriers and facilitators for ordering and receiving lung cancer screening and tobacco treatment. At the nexus of primary care and lung cancer screening, this study will demonstrate the impact of this multi-level intervention designed to stimulate use of evidence-based and guideline-concordant care among primary care clinicians and racially-diverse, medically underserved patients at risk for lung cancer.

Вмешательства

  • Поведенческое Usual Care
    Usual care incorporates guideline awareness and brief advice.
  • Поведенческое RiskProfile-Clin
    RiskProfile-Clin incorporates standard brief advice and guideline awareness plus specific patient risk feedback using clinical factors.
  • Поведенческое RiskProfile-Gen
    RiskProfile-Gen incorporates standard brief advice and guideline awareness plus specific patient risk feedback using clinical factors and genetic factors.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Clinician ordering of lung cancer screening [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 6 months post-intervention]
  • Patient completion of lung cancer screening [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 6 months post-intervention]
Вторичные конечные точки (9)
  • Clinician ordering of lung cancer screening [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Patient completion of lung cancer screening [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Patient completion of lung cancer screening, of those with order for screening [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Patient ongoing adherence to annual repeat lung cancer screening [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Clinician prescribing of tobacco treatment [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Patient use of tobacco treatment [Срок оценки: From enrollment through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Readiness to quit smoking [Срок оценки: From baseline through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Smoking heaviness [Срок оценки: From baseline through 18 months post-intervention]
  • Smoking abstinence [Срок оценки: From baseline through 18 months post-intervention]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

CLINICIANS:

\- Primary care clinician with active caseload in participating clinics

PATIENTS:

  • Patient of participating primary care clinician
  • Lung cancer screening naïve
  • Between 50 to 80 years of age, inclusive
  • Current or former smokers
  • Pack years ≥ 20
  • English-speaking

Критерии исключения

PATIENTS:

  • Lung cancer diagnosis
  • Current order placed for lung cancer screening

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Простое слепое
Основная цель
Профилактика

Центры проведения

США · 1 центр
  • Washington University School of Medicine — St Louis

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT05627674 · 202203081 · R01CA268030

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗