Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair

Официальное название

Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Обзор

This study is evaluating the management of chronic post-operative inguinal hernia pain and the impact of hernia mesh removal after previous minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs. The study aims are to evaluate the change in chronic (\>6 months), nociceptive, postoperative inguinal pain after mesh removal compared to no mesh removal in patients who have previously undergone minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh.

Подробное описание

This is a double-blinded, parallel (1:1) group, randomized-controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be blinded to their treatment allocation and will understand that by entering the study, they may receive diagnostic laparoscopy only in which case their mesh will not be removed. However, they will be allowed to consider crossing over to the mesh removal group 6 months or later after surgery if they do not have adequate pain relief. Patients will receive written and oral descriptions of the trial and will be provided time to review written documentation in private. Written and oral consent will be obtained, and patients will understand that their participation is voluntary and refusal to participate will not affect future medical care. Patients may also withdraw from the trial at any point throughout the study period.

The Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, a center within the Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute (DDSI), at Cleveland Clinic Foundation Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio is the hosting department for this study. Cleveland Clinic - Hillcrest Hospital in Mayfield Heights, Ohio will also be a participating center in this study. Fellowship-trained surgeons with expertise in complex abdominal wall reconstruction and mesh removal will perform the operations. If enrollment fails to meet necessary accrual size within the study timeframe, additional centers may be invited to participate.

Вмешательства

• Процедура Diagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal
  Surgical examination and treatment of groin pain following inguinal hernia surgery by surgical exploration with a laparoscope or removal of mesh laparoscopically
• Процедура Diagnostic laparoscopy
  Surgical examination through laparoscopy without removal of mesh

Первичные конечные точки

• Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) [Срок оценки: Change in NRS-11 scores will be measured from baseline to 6 months after surgery for both groups.]

Вторичные конечные точки (4)

• Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [Срок оценки: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months]
• Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) [Срок оценки: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months]
• EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire [Срок оценки: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months]
• Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) [Срок оценки: Baseline NRS-11 scores will be measured and compared to scores at 3 months after surgery for both groups.]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

• > 18 years of age
• CPIP lasting > 6 months after laparoscopic or robotic inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh
• Must exhibit 1 or more of the following characteristics of nociceptive pain:

History:

• Pain while sitting in a chair for prolonged periods of time with relief when extending the hip or lying supine to straighten the leg
• Severe pain when crossing the affected leg over the contralateral leg
• "Foreign body sensation" or "tightness" in the groin

Exam:

-Diffuse tenderness with deep palpation along the inguinal ligament (over the mesh)

Somatosensory mapping:

• Does not have a maximum trigger point for pain
• Lacks characteristics of neuropathic pain (sharp, burning, shooting, paresthesias, allodynia, hyperalgesia, etc.)

• Moderate to severe pain \[4-10\] when moving from supine to standing on NRS

Критерии исключения

• No characteristics of nociceptive groin pain
• Zero or mild pain \[0-3\] when moving from supine to standing on NRS
• Recurrent inguinal hernia detected on clinical exam
• Large, femoral, direct or indirect inguinal hernia (F2-3, M2-3, L2-3) on diagnostic laparoscopy as defined by European Hernia Society (EHS) classification
• Prior open (anterior) approach to inguinal hernia repair (i.e. Lichtenstein)
• Prior mesh plugs or Prolene Hernia Systems
• History of prostatectomy or vascular procedures in the pelvis or groin

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Рандомизированное

Модель

Перекрёстный дизайн

Маскирование

Двойное слепое

Основная цель

Лечение

Центры проведения

США · 1 центр

• Cleveland Clinic — Cleveland

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT05484635 · 22-411

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗