Меню
Идёт набор NCT05100342

Prospective Validation of a Points Score System Predicting 30-day Survival

Наблюдательное Metastatic Cancer

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Point score prediction tool for 30-day survival.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Metastatic Cancer. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
США
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Prospective Validation of a Points Score System Predicting 30-day Survival for Patients With Metastatic Cancer Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy

Обзор

This is a one-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial designed to prospectively test the survival prediction tool as developed by Lee et al on patients referred to radiation oncology for palliative treatments. Survival prediction score based on objective data including laboratory values, attendance to emergency room, and primary cancer origin will be assigned to each patient at time of enrollment.

Подробное описание

This is a one-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial designed to prospectively test the survival prediction tool as developed by Lee et al (section 10.0) on patients referred to radiation oncology for palliative treatments. Survival prediction score based on objective data including laboratory values, visits to emergency room, and primary cancer origin will be assigned to each patient at time of enrollment. The prediction tool assigns a score from 0-20, with 20 indicating the worst survival prognosis; the investigators have designated mortality risk groups as follows: low-risk (score 0-6), intermediate-risk (score 7-13), and high-risk (score 14-20). Patient survival and quality of life will then be monitored at 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day intervals. The study will test the hypothesis that patients with a score of \>14 have a less than 20% chance of survival at 30 days.

Primary Objective:

1\. To evaluate 30-day survival of patients with a score of \>14 (high-risk group)

Secondary Objectives:

1. To evaluate 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day survival of patients in low-risk (score 0-6), and intermediate-risk (score 7-13) groups, and to evaluate 90-day and 365-day survival of patients in high-risk group (score \>14) 2. To evaluate patient-reported quality of life at the above intervals using the validated FACIT-Pal-14© questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care 14 Item Version)

Вмешательства

  • Диагностический тест Point score prediction tool for 30-day survival
    This tool requires laboratory data including white blood cell count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and red cell distribution, as well as number of attendances to the emergency room in the past 100 days, the site receiving radiation therapy, and the primary cancer type. Each data point correlates with a point value, which are tallied to generate a final score. The scores range from 0-20, with 0 giving the highest chance for survival

Первичные конечные точки

  • 30-day survival of patients with a score of >14 (high-risk group) [Срок оценки: From baseline to 30 days after enrollment]
Вторичные конечные точки (2)
  • The percentage of patients in each risk group (low, intermediate, and high) who are living at 30 days, 90 days, and 365 days following enrollment [Срок оценки: 30 days, 90 days and 365 days after enrollment]
  • Tabulated patient-report quality of life surveys at 30 days, 90 days, and 365 days [Срок оценки: Baseline, 30 days, 90 days and 365 days after enrollment]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Age ≥ 18 at time of consent
  • Ability to provide written informed consent
  • Cancer diagnosis referred to Radiation Oncology for palliative radiation therapy
  • Patients who either choose to not receive radiation therapy or not recommended to receive radiation therapy will remain eligible
  • Those patients who undergo a course of palliative radiation therapy, it is not the requirement of this study to complete that course of treatment. Those who prematurely end their course of treatment will remain eligible Note: Patients who ultimately either choose to not receive radiation or not recommended to receive radiation will remain eligible

Note: Patients who ultimately do not complete prescribed radiation will remain eligible

Критерии исключения

  • Patients who are unable to participate in follow up visits per investigator discretion (virtual/phone follow up is permitted)
  • Patients who are receiving definitive/curative course of radiation therapy
  • Patients who self-report as pregnant or nursing

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Модель наблюдения
Случай-контроль

Центры проведения

США · 3 центра
  • IU Health West — Avon
  • IU Health North / Schwarz Cancer Center — Carmel
  • Methodist Hospital — Indianapolis

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT05100342 · CTO-IUSCCC-0763

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗