Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07753759

Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Phenol Neurolysis for Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

No phase Interventional Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation, Ultrasound-guided phenol neurolysis.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation Versus Ultrasound -Guided Phenol Neurolysis in Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain is a common complication that negatively affects upper limb function and quality of life. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation versus ultrasound-guided phenol neurolysis targeting the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves in patients with post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain. The primary outcome is pain reduction, while secondary outcomes include shoulder function, spasticity, range of motion, quality of life, analgesic consumption, and adverse events during follow-up.

Detailed description

Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a common complication following stroke. It may lead to withdrawal from rehabilitation programs, reduced upper-limb movement and poorer functional recovery; therefore, timely pain control is relevant to rehabilitation participation and long-term outcome. \[1\] A systematic review reported wide variation in incidence and prevalence; pooled/meta-analytic estimates included incidence ranges around 10-22% and prevalence ranges around 22-47%, while individual studies varied more widely because of differences in timing, definitions and clinical settings. Risk factors include increased tone, impaired motor function, sensory impairment, shoulder subluxation, abnormal shoulder examination, hemispastical neglect and prior shoulder pain. \[1,2\] The cause of post-stroke HSP is often multifactorial. The mechanisms can be grouped into: (a) impaired motor control and tone changes; (b) soft-tissue lesions and (c) altered peripheral and central nervous activity, Because these mechanisms may overlap in the same patient, baseline clinical and ultrasound phenotyping will be used to document the dominant pain/spasticity pattern and to exclude structural shoulder pathology requiring surgical management. \[1,3,4\] Central sensitization, defined as increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to normal or subthreshold afferent input, may contribute to persistent HSP. \[4\] Pulsed radiofrequency delivers radiofrequency current in intermittent pulses consisting of short periods of electrical stimulation, typically 20 ms, followed by longer silent phases, approximately 480 ms. This intermittent delivery allows heat dissipation and keeps target tissue temperature below approximately 42 degrees Celsius, thereby reducing the risk of thermal nerve injury. For this reason, the intervention is described in this enhanced protocol as PRF rather than conventional thermal radiofrequency ablation. This correction improves technical accuracy because the submitted synopsis described a PRF technique rather than destructive thermal ablation. \[5\] PRF stimulation may reduce pain through long-term depression of C-fiber-mediated spinal sensitization and several neuromodulatory effects on inflammatory and descending inhibitory pathways. The exact mechanism remains elucidated; therefore, the study will measure both pain and function rather than assuming a single mechanism of benefit. \[5,6\] Phenol is a neurolytic agent used to manage focal spasticity. Immediately after injection, phenol may produce a transient local anesthetic effect by reversibly blocking nerve conduction. At neurolytic concentrations, commonly around 5-6%, phenol causes protein denaturation with segmental demyelination, axonal degeneration, and Wallerian degeneration of exposed nerve fibers, interrupting nerve conduction and reducing overactivity. Because phenol can cause dysesthesia, pain, inflammation, hypotension or unintended motor/sensory effects, the protocol specifies ultrasound guidance, aspiration before injection, limited per-nerve volumes according to institutional SOP, post-procedure monitoring, and structured AE recording.

Interventions

  • Procedure Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation
    Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency will be applied to radicular branch of suprascapular, axillary and lat pectoral nerves
  • Other Ultrasound-guided phenol neurolysis
    Ultrasound-guided phenol injection will be applied to radicular branch of suprascapular, axillary and lat pectoral nerves

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in shoulder pain intensity measured from baseline to 3 months [Time frame: 3months]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
  • Pain intensity by VAS at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (1-7)at 1, 3, and 6 month [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Functional outcomes using SPADI. [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Neuromuscular/shoulder ultrasound findings, including bursitis, tendinopathy, effusion, subluxation or other relevant pathology when assessed. [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Technical success [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Analgesic/rescue medication consumption during follow-up. [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Shoulder ROM measured by goniometer using a standardized method and side-positioning protocol. [14 [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Shoulder spasticity using MAS, with predefined target muscle groups documented at baseline. [12] [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older. History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed clinically and/or by neuroimaging when available.

Post-stroke shoulder pain on the hemiplegic side with VAS pain intensity >=4/10 during rest, passive movement or functional use.

Spasticity of target shoulder-girdle muscles with MAS score >=2. Stable medical condition allowing outpatient or inpatient interventional procedure.

Ability to provide written informed consent; if the patient has a communication impairment, consent will follow institutional ethics-approved procedures involving legally authorized representatives when appropriate.

Expected ability to attend scheduled follow-up visits through 6 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous radiofrequency treatment or phenol neurolysis to the affected shoulder within the previous 6 months.

Botulinum toxin injection to the target shoulder muscles within the previous 3-6 months.

Shoulder fracture, dislocation or rotator cuff tear requiring surgery. Active infection at the injection site. Known allergy or contraindication to phenol, local anesthetic, antiseptic solution or other procedure-related medication.

Coagulopathy, platelet disorder or anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment that cannot be safely managed according to local anesthesia/interventional-pain policy.

Severe uncontrolled medical illness, unstable cardiopulmonary disease, uncontrolled diabetes with active infection risk, or any condition judged by investigators to increase procedural risk.

Severe cognitive, behavioral, or communication impairment preventing reliable pain/outcome assessment unless a validated caregiver-assisted assessment approach is approved by the ethics committee.

Pregnancy or lactation, when applicable, because of procedural medication exposure and safety monitoring requirements.

Concurrent participation in another interventional trial that may affect shoulder pain, tone or function.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Park D, Chang MC. The mechanism of action of pulsed radiofrequency in reducing pain: a narrative review. J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2022 Jul;39(3):200-205. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00101. Epub 2022 Apr 7. PMID 35385898
  • Karri J, Mas MF, Francisco GE, Li S. Practice patterns for spasticity management with phenol neurolysis. J Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun 28;49(6):482-488. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2239. PMID 28537343
  • International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R3). Final version. Adopted 06 January 2025.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07753759 · ASU-HSP-PRF-PHENOL-1

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗