Intelligent Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Coil Embolization
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Physician-Experience Microcatheter Shaping, AI-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping Simulation Technology.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Intracranial Aneurysm. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- China
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Safety and Effectiveness of Intelligent Microcatheter Shaping Simulation Technology in Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational, Real-World Registry Study
Overview
This prospective, multicenter, observational registry study will evaluate the real-world safety, effectiveness, and clinical value of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted microcatheter shaping during coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Adults with an intracranial aneurysm who are scheduled to undergo coil embolization will be enrolled and followed for approximately 12 months. The study will not assign participants to a treatment strategy. All treatment decisions will be made by the treating physicians according to routine clinical practice. Participants will be analyzed according to whether microcatheter shaping is performed based on the physician's experience alone or with assistance from an intelligent microcatheter shaping simulation technology. The study will evaluate major adverse events within 12 months, immediate aneurysm occlusion after the procedure, clinical and quality-of-life outcomes, follow-up imaging findings, serious adverse events, repeat treatment or rehospitalization, microcatheter delivery performance, and health care resource use. At least 1,438 participants are planned to be enrolled.
Detailed description
Microcatheter shaping is an important technical step in the endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. The shape and stability of the microcatheter may affect access to the aneurysm, coil delivery, procedural efficiency, and procedural safety. The AI-assisted microcatheter shaping simulation technology evaluated in this study analyzes three-dimensional cerebrovascular anatomy to assist with aneurysm localization and measurement and to generate a suggested microcatheter shaping plan. The technology provides decision support, while the treating physician remains responsible for all clinical decisions.
This is a prospective, multicenter, observational, real-world registry study. Adult patients with an intracranial aneurysm confirmed by computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography and scheduled to undergo coil embolization may be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will not be randomly assigned to a treatment group, and participation in the registry will not determine the treatment received.
For analysis, participants will be classified into two observational cohorts according to actual clinical practice. In the physician-experience cohort, microcatheter shaping is performed according to the treating physician's experience. In the AI-assisted cohort, microcatheter shaping is performed with support from the intelligent microcatheter shaping simulation technology.
Study information will be collected during six planned visits: screening, the procedure, the postoperative hospitalization period, approximately 30 days after treatment, approximately 180 days after treatment, and approximately 360 days after treatment. Collected data will include participant characteristics, medical history, aneurysm and parent-artery morphology, procedural and device information, medication use, microcatheter delivery time and attempts, number of shaping attempts, microcatheter stability, clinical outcomes, quality of life, imaging outcomes, adverse events, serious adverse events, repeat interventions, rehospitalizations, and health care resource use.
The primary safety evaluation is the occurrence of major adverse events within 12 months, defined as neurological death or major ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Major stroke is defined as an increase of at least 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The primary effectiveness evaluation is immediate adequate aneurysm occlusion after coil embolization, defined as Raymond grade I or II.
Because the use of AI-assisted technology is determined by routine clinical practice rather than random assignment, statistical analyses will focus on estimating differences between the two cohorts while accounting for potential confounding factors. Regression-based adjustment will be used, with propensity score methods and sensitivity analyses considered when appropriate.
Interventions
- Procedure Physician-Experience Microcatheter Shaping
Microcatheter shaping is planned and performed by the treating physician according to clinical experience without assistance from the intelligent microcatheter shaping simulation technology. The shaping approach is determined during routine clinical care and is not assigned by the study protocol. - Device AI-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping Simulation Technology
An artificial intelligence-based decision-support technology that analyzes three-dimensional cerebrovascular anatomy, assists with aneurysm localization and measurement, and provides a suggested microcatheter shaping plan for intracranial aneurysm coil embolization. Use of the technology is determined by routine clinical practice and is not assigned by the study protocol.
Primary outcome measures
- Incidence of Major Adverse Events Within 12 Months [Time frame: From the index procedure through 12 months after the procedure]
- Immediate Adequate Occlusion of the Target Aneurysm [Time frame: Immediately after coil embolization on the day of the procedure]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Modified Rankin Scale Score [Time frame: At hospital discharge or Day 7 after the procedure, 30 days (±15 days), 180 days (±30 days), and 360 days (±45 days) after the procedure]
- EQ-5D-5L Health Utility Index [Time frame: At baseline, hospital discharge or Day 7 after the procedure, 30 days (±15 days), 180 days (±30 days), and 360 days (±45 days) after the procedure]
- EQ Visual Analog Scale Score [Time frame: At baseline, hospital discharge or Day 7 after the procedure, 30 days (±15 days), 180 days (±30 days), and 360 days (±45 days) after the procedure]
- Incidence of Procedure-Related Serious Adverse Events [Time frame: From the index procedure through 12 months after the procedure]
- Incidence of Neurological Events [Time frame: From the index procedure through 12 months after the procedure]
- Incidence of Target Aneurysm Reintervention or Rehospitalization [Time frame: From hospital discharge through 12 months after the procedure]
- Length of Index Hospital Stay [Time frame: At hospital discharge, up to 30 days after admission for the index procedure.]
- Cumulative Treatment-Related Costs [Time frame: From the index hospitalization through 12 months after the procedure]
- Adequate Occlusion of the Target Aneurysm During Follow-Up [Time frame: At 180 days (±30 days) and 360 days (±45 days) after the procedure]
- Incidence of Greater Than 50 Percent Parent Artery Stenosis [Time frame: At 180 days (±30 days) and 360 days (±45 days) after the procedure]
- Microcatheter Delivery Time [Time frame: During the index coil embolization procedure]
- Number of Microcatheter Delivery Attempts [Time frame: During the index coil embolization procedure]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age 18 years or older, with no restriction based on sex.
- Diagnosis of an intracranial aneurysm confirmed by computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography, with the target aneurysm planned for treatment by coil embolization.
- Ability to understand the study requirements and treatment procedures and provision of written informed consent before any study-specific procedure.
Exclusion criteria
- Currently unable or expected to be unable to complete the 1-year follow-up.
- Participation in another clinical study that may affect the results of this study.
- Life expectancy of less than 1 year because of another disease or medical condition.
- Considered unsuitable for participation by the investigator.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
China · 1 center
- Xuanwu Hospital — Beijing
Publications
- Yang H, Ni W, Xu L, Geng J, He X, Ba H, Yu J, Qin L, Yin Y, Huang Y, Zhang H, Gu Y. Computer-assisted microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm embolization: evaluation of safety and efficacy in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jan 12;16(2):177-182. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020104. PMID 37080769
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07749404 · xwzhqmayongjiesxwsmhyf