Implementing Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Vaginismus: From Efficacy to Clinical Integration (VIVID 3)
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Implementation of Virtual Reality Exposure.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Vaginismus, Difficulties With Vaginal Penetration. Basic parameters: from 19 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Canada
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Vaginismus, a condition characterized by involuntary tightening of the pelvic floor muscles due to strong fear of vaginal insertion, impact ≥6% of the female population and can make vaginal intercourse and medical exams difficult. This project explores virtual reality exposure (VRE) as a new treatment approach. Building on our two previous studies showing that VRE is feasible and effective in helping patients to gradually face feared sexual encounters in a virtual environment, we aim to implement our VRE protocol at the BC Centre for Vulvar Health (BCCVH). We will assess barriers/facilitators to implementation, clinician uptake, and patients' outcomes and engagement.
Detailed description
PURPOSE: Vaginismus is a gynecologic condition characterized by involuntary tightening of the pelvic floor muscles. It is defined by intense fear of vaginal insertion, leading to persistent difficulties with vaginal intercourse and gynaecological exams The anticipation of pain provokes hypervigilance, negative cognitions, and avoidance behaviour, leading vaginismus to be conceptualized as a phobia. Equipped with data from Studies 1 and 2 from our 3-stage program for VRE to treat vaginismus, we have demonstrated that our VRE paradigm is feasible to deliver, usable, satisfactory to participants, and highly efficacious. We are now ideally positioned to evaluate the implementation of our VRE paradigm at VCH's BCCVH, which offers multidisciplinary treatment for individuals with chronic and distressing vulvo-vaginal pain and fear of vaginal insertion. Our goal is to use implementation science to study the phased implementation of our VRE protocol within the BCCVH, ultimately leading to better treatment options for women with vaginismus.
JUSTIFICATION: Lack of effective treatments: While vaginismus is common, believed to impact 6% of the female population, it remains underdiagnosed, effective treatment options are limited, and patients often feel dismissed by care providers. Available psychological treatments for vaginismus rely on gradual self-insertion of vaginal dilators at home combined with psychological therapy. However, many individuals experience severe fear and avoidance that make it difficult to engage with these exercises, reducing treatment success. VRE Theoretical approach: This project uses a theoretical approach recognizing that the psychological fear of pain drives hypervigilance to sexual stimuli, leading to physiological responses such as tightening of the pelvic floor muscles which in turn causes physical pain. Thus, addressing fear is a key piece of managing this condition and can be achieved through fear extinction approaches such as exposure therapy. Traditionally, this approach involves repeatedly exposing an individual to the fear-inducing stimulus until their fear decreases (habituates). When exposure is successful, a new association develops and inhibits the retrieval of the original fear memory. Our VRE paradigm is built upon this theory. VRE immerses people in 3D simulations of feared situations and is as effective as real-life exposure for specific phobias. VRE for vaginismus is gradual exposure to feared sexual encounters in a virtual environment and can diminish phobic responses to vaginal insertion. Given that people with vaginismus cope via intense avoidance and often do not perform recommended at-home exposure exercises, the "immersive" nature of VRE ideally target this avoidance.
PROOF OF CONCEPT: Findings from Study 1 \& 2 of this 3-stage VRE research program showed that: 1) VR sexual stimuli elicit a greater fear in individuals with vaginismus relative to individuals without, 2) most participants would participate in a VRE intervention in clinic if it was available, and 3) participants strongly support the efficacy of the VRE approach. Together, these findings support the readiness to move forward with preparing for clinic implementation of this approach. The BCCVH is a provincial referral centre providing interdisciplinary, evidence-based care for vulvar and pelvic pain conditions, seeing 250 new patients each year. Its established clinical infrastructure, patient volume, and commitment to innovation make it an ideal setting to evaluate the implementation of VRE within existing clinic workflow.
OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to use implementation science to study the phased implementation of our VRE protocol within the BCCVH. The specific aims are to: (1) Conduct a barriers/facilitators assessment; (2) Evaluate clinician uptake, feasibility, and acceptability with pilot implementation of VRE; and (3) Assess patient reported outcomes of anxiety, sexual distress, pain, and home treatment engagement after VRE.
Interventions
- Behavioral Implementation of Virtual Reality Exposure
To inform implementation, clinicians at BCCVH (n=6) will participate in individual semi-structured interviews prior to implementation to identify barriers and facilitators. Findings from these interviews will refine the implementation protocol. Following implementation, clinicians will complete questionnaires assessing implementation outcomes, including adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Participants (n=167) will receive a single VRE session in addition to standard clinical care at the
Primary outcome measures
- VRE session duration [Time frame: Assessed every session through study completion, 20 months]
- Staff time & resource utilization [Time frame: Assessed every session through study completion, 20 months]
- Cost of VRE delivery [Time frame: Assessed at study completion]
- Technical challenges & adaptations [Time frame: Assessed every session through study completion, 20 months.]
- Fidelity of VRE delivery [Time frame: Assessed every session through study completion, 20 months.]
- Clinicians trained in VRE delivery [Time frame: Assessed at time of training (unknown for now).]
- Adoption of VRE [Time frame: Assessed 6-months and 12-months after implementation.]
- Maintenance of VRE [Time frame: Assessed before implementation, 6-months and 12-months after implementation.]
- Reach [Time frame: Assessed yearly through study completion, 20 months.]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
- Mean change from baseline in State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety-State score [Time frame: Baseline at 48 hours before VRE session, 48 hours after VRE session, and 6-months after VRE session.]
- Mean change from baseline in Vaginal Penetration Cognition score [Time frame: Baseline at 48 hours before VRE session, 48 hours after VRE session, and 6-months after VRE session.]
- Mean change from baseline in Female Sexual Distress score [Time frame: Baseline at 48 hours before VRE session, 48 hours after VRE session, and 6-months after VRE session.]
- Mean change from before to after VRE in Shortened State scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score [Time frame: Immediately before VRE session and immediately after VRE session.]
- Igroup Presence Questionnaire score [Time frame: Immediately after VRE session.]
- Reported ease of vaginal accommodator insertion [Time frame: Immediately after VRE, if optional vaginal accommodator insertion attempted.]
- Reported pain with vaginal accommodator insertion [Time frame: Immediately after VRE, if optional vaginal accommodator insertion attempted.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosis of vaginismus defined by a "marked fear or anxiety about vulvovaginal or pelvic pain in anticipation of, during, or because of vaginal penetration" (criterion from the DSM-5 definition of Genito-Pelvic Pain Penetration Disorder)
- Aged >19 y, of any sexual orientation
- Fluent in English (psychoeducational materials and questionnaires delivered in English)
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (to view the VR scenes during exposure)
- Able to travel to Vancouver
Exclusion criteria
- Presence of: unprovoked vaginal pain
- Vulvar skin condition (i.e., lichen sclerosus)
- Epilepsy characterized by photosensitive seizures.
Note: provoked vulvar pain is not an exclusion criterion because at least 40% of people with vaginismus report pain with attempted penetration.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- N/A
- Model
- Single group
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Canada · 1 center
- Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre — Vancouver
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07747298 · H26-01276