Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07746492

Just-in-Time Support for Smoking, Vaping, and Eating Urges During High-Stress Moments Among Gender and Sexual Minority Adults in Dhaka

No phase Interventional Tobacco Use Electronic Cigarette Use Emotional Eating Stress, Psychological

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Just-in-Time Adaptive Support Message.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Tobacco Use, Electronic Cigarette Use, Emotional Eating, Stress, Psychological. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Bangladesh
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Digital Real-Time Support for Stress-Induced Smoking and Unhealthy Eating Among Gender and Sexual Minorities in Dhaka

Overview

Gender and sexual minority adults in Bangladesh experience high levels of stigma-related stress. Acute stress can trigger strong, affect-driven urges to smoke, vape, or engage in stress-attributed eating. These urges can rise and fall within minutes to hours, operating outside the reach of conventional clinic-based interventions delivered days or weeks later. This pilot micro-randomized trial (MRT) evaluates whether delivering a brief, culturally adapted support message via smartphone during moments of high self-reported stress reduces the intensity of the urge for the participant's pre-specified target behaviour, relative to no message. Over a 24-day period, 115 participants will be scheduled for up to 5 ecological momentary assessments (EMA) per day. Whenever a participant reports an acute stress level of 5 or higher (0 to 10 scale) and satisfies pre-specified privacy, safety, behavioural, and spacing criteria, the app randomizes with probability 0.5 to deliver either a brief support message or no message. By contributing multiple randomized decision points over time, each participant serves as their own micro-control. The primary outcome is the intensity of the urge for the participant's pre-specified target behaviour, measured 45 to 60 minutes after randomization. An exploratory urge assessment is also collected 10 minutes after randomization; comparing the two time points will help establish whether the support message's effect is immediate, delayed, or both, and will inform the choice of follow-up window for a future, fully powered trial. Prior to trial launch, all EMA items, message content, notification logic, and digital safety protocols will be developed and tested with community members, reviewed by a Community Advisory Board, and locked. As a pilot optimization trial, its objectives are to estimate the short-term causal effect of the prompt, to identify the contexts in which that effect is larger or smaller, and to establish whether momentary assessment and just-in-time intervention research can be delivered safely, privately, and acceptably in this high-stigma setting. The study does not evaluate long-term behavioural maintenance and does not claim to address the underlying structural stigma and discrimination that produce minority stress.

Detailed description

Registered Study and Formative Phase: The registered interventional study is a micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving 115 participants over a 24-day assessment period. It is preceded by a formative cultural adaptation and technical refinement phase conducted to develop, optimize, and lock the momentary assessment items, support message library, notification wording, and digital safety features. This preliminary phase comprises cognitive walkthroughs and think-aloud interviews with approximately 10 community members, a short structured momentary assessment run to characterize the naturalistic distribution of momentary stress ratings, and a technology validation period. The formative phase involves no randomization and no assignment to any intervention. It is not part of the registered interventional cohort, is not included in the registered enrollment figure, and does not determine the study start date.

Micro-Randomization Framework: Randomization occurs repeatedly within each participant rather than once between participants. Each participant is randomized at every decision point during the 24-day period that satisfies all predefined eligibility criteria, thereby contributing both intervention and control observations over time. The primary unit of randomization and proximal observation is the eligible decision point; repeated observations are nested within participants.

Decision Point Definition: Randomization occurs at available high-stress decision points, defined as a completed momentary assessment at which all five of the following conditions are satisfied simultaneously: the assessment is completed within the allowed 30-minute response window; the participant reports a current stress level of 5 or higher on a 0 to 10 scale; the participant confirms that it is currently safe and private enough to receive a message; the participant has not already reported performing their designated primary target behavior since the preceding completed assessment; and no randomization has occurred in the preceding 90 minutes. Moments that fail any criterion are logged by the platform for system audit and feasibility monitoring but are not randomized.

Randomization Procedure: At each available decision point, the digital platform randomizes prompt assignment independently, with a fixed probability of p = 0.50, to either delivery of a supportive coping prompt or no prompt (active assessment control). The randomization outcome and timestamp are securely logged.

Assessment Schedule and Conflict Resolution: Participants receive five scheduled baseline momentary assessments per day, delivered at randomized times within five pre-specified daily time blocks, with one assessment per block across the 24-day period. Following every randomization, in both the prompt and no-prompt conditions, participants complete a brief micro-check assessment at 10 minutes, with a 5-minute response window, and a main proximal follow-up assessment at 45 minutes, with a 15-minute response window. To prevent assessment overload and survey collision, if a regularly scheduled baseline assessment falls within 60 minutes after a randomization, that scheduled assessment is automatically suppressed by the platform and recorded as protocol-suppressed rather than missing.

Target Behaviour and Multi-Behavioral Logic: Participants who qualify on both smoking/vaping and stress-attributed eating designate a single primary target behavior at baseline. This designation is locked before the assessment period begins and remains fixed throughout the study to maintain primary outcome integrity. Urge intensity for both behaviors is measured at every momentary assessment to allow descriptive, exploratory characterization of urge patterns across behaviors, consistent with the pre-specified exploratory outcome measures; however, only the locked target behavior provides the primary confirmatory outcome. Urge scores for the two behaviors are analyzed independently and are never averaged or combined.

Sample Size and Power Assumptions: The target enrolment is 115 participants. Under the planning assumptions regarding attrition, momentary assessment completion, high-stress trigger frequency, and availability, approximately 1,225 randomized decision points are expected. Detailed power assumptions and sensitivity analyses will be prespecified in the statistical analysis plan.

Statistical Analysis Plan: The primary analysis estimates the proximal causal effect of prompt delivery on behaviour-specific urge intensity using weighted and centered least squares with robust standard errors. Binary secondary outcomes are analysed using the estimator for causal excursion effects with binary proximal outcomes. Secondary behavioural outcomes are powered for estimation rather than for confirmatory testing and are reported with confidence intervals to inform the design of a future trial.

Interpretation, Estimands, and Scope: The control condition is "no message" within the context of active momentary monitoring, rather than a neutral placebo message. The estimated causal effect therefore reflects the incremental contribution of receiving a supportive coping prompt relative to active self-monitoring alone, and does not separate the effect of the prompt's content from the effect of being notified at all. Participants are not blinded to condition, and outcomes are self-reported. The 10-minute micro-check is delivered identically across both conditions, holding proximal self-monitoring and appraisal constant across arms. These design features are inherent to the JITAI framework and are stated as part of the estimand in all reports of findings.

Safety, Privacy, and Advisory Governance: Privacy is treated as an essential component of participant safety. Notification wording is neutral and non-disclosing, and intervention content is displayed only after the participant opens the study application. Participants may decline, skip, or temporarily pause assessments at any time.

Direct identifiers are stored separately from momentary assessment data, and access is restricted to authorized study personnel. A prespecified distress-response and referral protocol operates throughout the trial.

A Community Advisory Board reviews the recruitment procedures, assessment items, support-message content, notification wording, digital safety protections, and distress-response procedures before the trial materials are finalized and locked.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Just-in-Time Adaptive Support Message
    A brief, culturally adapted, in-app behavioral support message delivered on the participant's own smartphone immediately after randomization at an eligible high-stress decision point. Content is finalized and locked before the trial following a formative cultural adaptation phase and review by a Community Advisory Board. The message is matched to the participant's locked target behavior and may include grounding, urge-delay, motivational, values-based, environmental, substitute-action, social-su

Primary outcome measures

  • Target-behavior momentary urge intensity [Time frame: At the primary follow-up delivered 45 minutes after each randomized decision point, with responses accepted through 60 minutes after randomization; assessed repeatedly throughout the 24-day assessment period.]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Smoking or vaping episode following randomization [Time frame: From each randomized decision point through the primary follow-up delivered 45 minutes later, with responses accepted through 60 minutes after randomization; assessed repeatedly throughout the 24-day assessment period.]
  • Stress-attributed eating episode following randomization [Time frame: From each randomized decision point through the primary follow-up delivered 45 minutes later, with responses accepted through 60 minutes after randomization; assessed repeatedly throughout the 24-day assessment period.]
  • Momentary assessment completion rate [Time frame: Across the 24-day assessment period.]
  • Participant retention through day 24 [Time frame: Across the 24-day assessment period.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Self-identifies as a gender and/or sexual minority person
  • Resides in Dhaka at enrolment and expects to remain in Dhaka throughout the 24-day assessment period
  • Reports at least one qualifying behaviour on average at least 3 days per week during the past month: (a) smoking or vaping, or (b) eating primarily in response to stress, anxiety, or emotional distress
  • Owns a personal Android or iOS smartphone compatible with the study platform that is used solely by the participant and is not shared with others
  • Able to read, understand, and respond to simple Bangla text
  • Able to operate the study app independently after a structured onboarding session
  • Willing to complete five scheduled app-based momentary assessments per day for 24 days and additional brief follow-up assessments after randomized decision points
  • Provides written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Currently participating in another behavioural or pharmacological intervention study targeting smoking, vaping, or eating behaviour
  • Has a severe or unstable psychiatric condition that, based on screening and review by the study clinician, would make participation in the repeated daily assessment protocol unsafe
  • Is unable to operate the study app independently after structured onboarding

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Bangladesh · 1 center
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) — Dhaka

Publications

  • Jhe GB, Mereish EH, Gordon AR, Woulfe JM, Katz-Wise SL. Associations between anti-bisexual minority stress and body esteem and emotional eating among bi+ individuals: The protective role of individual- and community-level factors. Eat Behav. 2021 Dec;43:101575. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101575. Epub 2021 Oct 14. PMID 34757266
  • Santoniccolo F, Rolle L. The role of minority stress in disordered eating: a systematic review of the literature. Eat Weight Disord. 2024 Jun 8;29(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s40519-024-01671-7. PMID 38850334
  • Li M, Chau K, Calabresi K, Wang Y, Wang J, Fritz J, Tseng TS. The Effect of Minority Stress Processes on Smoking for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Individuals: A Systematic Review. LGBT Health. 2024 Nov-Dec;11(8):583-605. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0323. Epub 2024 Apr 1. PMID 38557209
  • Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):674-697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674. PMID 12956539
  • Goldstein SP, Zhang F, Klasnja P, Hoover A, Wing RR, Thomas JG. Optimizing a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention to Improve Dietary Adherence in Behavioral Obesity Treatment: Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 6;10(12):e33568. doi: 10.2196/33568. PMID 34874892
  • Battalio SL, Conroy DE, Dempsey W, Liao P, Menictas M, Murphy S, Nahum-Shani I, Qian T, Kumar S, Spring B. Sense2Stop: A micro-randomized trial using wearable sensors to optimize a just-in-time-adaptive stress management intervention for smoking relapse prevention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;109:106534. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106534. Epub 2021 Aug 8. PMID 34375749
  • Liu X, Deliu N, Chakraborty B. Microrandomized Trials: Developing Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Better Public Health. Am J Public Health. 2023 Jan;113(1):60-69. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307150. Epub 2022 Nov 22. PMID 36413704
  • Cohn ER, Qian T, Murphy SA. Sample size considerations for micro-randomized trials with binary proximal outcomes. Stat Med. 2023 Jul 20;42(16):2777-2796. doi: 10.1002/sim.9748. Epub 2023 Apr 24. PMID 37094566

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07746492 · PR-26-069 · GR-02602

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗