Diagnostic Accuracy and Operational Efficiency of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Long Bone Fractures: A Brazilian Multicenter Study
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Bone Fractures, Long Bone Fracture. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for identifying long bone fractures in the emergency department. Traditionally, suspected long bone fractures are diagnosed using X-rays. While effective, X-rays require transporting patients to a radiology suite, involve exposure to ionizing radiation, and can contribute to longer emergency room wait times. POCUS is a portable, radiation-free imaging tool that physicians perform directly at the patient's bedside. The investigators hypothesize that POCUS can accurately identify or rule out long bone fractures when compared to standard X-rays, and that its use will reduce the time required to make clinical decisions. This is a multicenter, prospective observational study. Participants arriving at the emergency department with a suspected long bone fracture will undergo a bedside ultrasound examination performed by a trained emergency physician. Following the ultrasound, all participants will receive standard-of-care X-ray imaging. Researchers will compare the initial POCUS findings to the final X-ray results (the reference standard) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound. Additionally, the study will measure operational timelines-including time to diagnosis, time to treatment decision, and total length of stay in the emergency department-to assess the impact of POCUS on hospital workflow and patient care efficiency.
Detailed description
\## Background and Rationale
Long bone fractures are among the most frequent traumatic injuries managed in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide. The current standard of care for diagnosing these fractures is plain radiography (X-ray). While highly effective and widely available, the standard radiological workflow presents several challenges in crowded ED environments. It requires patient transport to a radiology suite-which can exacerbate pain in trauma patients-involves exposure to ionizing radiation, and often contributes to significant delays in clinical decision-making and overall length of stay (LOS).
Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a rapid, portable, and radiation-free imaging modality that can be performed directly at the patient's bedside. Previous single-center studies have suggested that POCUS has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fractures. However, there is a lack of robust, multicenter data evaluating its real-world implementation in diverse Brazilian emergency settings. The POCUS-BONE BR study aims to fill this gap by assessing both the diagnostic accuracy and the operational impact of integrating musculoskeletal POCUS into the standard trauma workflow.
\## Study Objectives
\*\*Primary Objective:\*\* To determine the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of bedside POCUS performed by emergency physicians for the detection of long bone fractures, using standard plain radiography as the reference standard.
\*\*Secondary Objectives:\*\*
* To evaluate operational efficiency by comparing time-to-diagnosis and time-to-disposition between the POCUS evaluation and standard radiological workflows. * To assess patient pain levels during the POCUS examination compared to standard X-ray positioning, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). * To determine the inter-observer agreement between the emergency physician's POCUS interpretation and the formal radiologist's X-ray report.
* Study Design and Methodology
POCUS-BONE BR is a prospective, multicenter, observational diagnostic accuracy study. It will be conducted across \[Insert Number\] participating emergency departments in Brazil.
Eligible patients presenting to the ED with clinical signs of a suspected long bone fracture (involving the femur, tibia, fibula, humerus, radius, or ulna) will be enrolled consecutively. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants or their legal representatives prior to enrollment.
* Study Procedures
1. \*\*Initial Assessment:\*\* Upon ED arrival and triage, patients with suspected long bone fractures will undergo standard clinical evaluation. 2. \*\*POCUS Examination:\*\* An emergency physician trained in musculoskeletal ultrasound will perform a targeted bedside POCUS examination of the affected limb. The physician will document the presence or absence of a fracture, the fracture type (e.g., cortical disruption), and the time of examination completion. 3. \*\*Reference Standard Imaging:\*\* Following the POCUS exam, all patients will undergo standard plain radiography of the affected extremity as dictated by standard clinical care. 4. \*\*Blinding:\*\* The emergency physician performing the POCUS will be blinded to the subsequent X-ray results. The radiologist or attending orthopedist interpreting the definitive X-ray will be blinded to the POCUS findings. 5. \*\*Clinical Management:\*\* Patient care, analgesia, and orthopedic consultation will proceed according to institutional protocols and will not be delayed by study procedures. * Data Collection and Metrics
Trained researchers will collect clinical and operational data using a standardized electronic case report form (eCRF) via \[e.g., REDCap\]. Key time-stamps recorded will include:
* Time of ED triage. * Time of POCUS completion. * Time of X-ray completion. * Time to definitive medical decision/orthopedic consultation. * Total ED Length of Stay (LOS).
* Statistical Analysis Plan
Diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals using standard 2x2 contingency tables. The agreement between POCUS and X-ray findings will be evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient.
Continuous variables (such as time-to-diagnosis and LOS) will be assessed for normality. Parametric data will be analyzed using Student's t-test, and non-parametric data using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value of \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The planned sample size of \[Insert Target Sample Size\] patients was calculated to achieve a \[Insert Power, e.g., 90%\] power to detect a sensitivity of at least \[Insert Percentage, e.g., 90%\] with a predefined margin of error.
Primary outcome measures
- Sensitivity of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours.]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
- Positive Predictive Value of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours]
- Negative Predictive Value of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours]
- Overall Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours]
- Interobserver Agreement Between Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Operators [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours]
- Time From Emergency Department Arrival to Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Result [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to establishment of the fracture diagnosis, assessed up to 24 hours]
- Time From Emergency Department Arrival to Radiography Report Availability [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to establishment of the fracture diagnosis, assessed up to 24 hours]
- Emergency Department Length of Stay [Time frame: From emergency department arrival to emergency department discharge, assessed up to 72 hours]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients aged 18 years or older;
- Presenting with clinical suspicion of a long bone fracture (pain, deformity, swelling, or functional limitation);
- Provision of informed consent (signed Informed Consent Form - ICF).
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with open fractures;
- Hemodynamic instability (resuscitation priority);
- Known previous fractures in the same bone segment;
- Need for immediate surgical intervention;
- Refusal to participate.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Ribeiro MCF, Ribeiro MEF, Da Silva Dos Santos G, De Santos Lima AK, Leonel BMC, De Castro Trindade MMM, et al. Perfil epidemiológico das internações por fratura de fêmur no Brasil entre 2019 a 2023. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences [Internet]. 2024 Jun 17;6(6):1154¿64. Available from: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/2331
- GBD 2019 Fracture Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Sep;2(9):e580-e592. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00172-0. PMID 34723233
- Delniotis I, Bontinis V, Ktenidis K, Drakonaki EE, Galanis N. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound versus X-ray for distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2649-2662. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02451-9. Epub 2024 Feb 1. PMID 38300283
- Matschiner E, Serban O, Fodor D, Blaivas M, Horn R, Koch J, Jakobi ML, Grevelding L, Osterwalder J, Srivastava D, Dietrich CF. Ultrasound in bone fracture diagnosis - a comparative meta-analysis and systematic review. Med Ultrason. 2025 Mar 2;27(1):52-62. doi: 10.11152/mu-4407. Epub 2024 Jun 28. PMID 39078997
- Douma-den Hamer D, Blanker MH, Edens MA, Buijteweg LN, Boomsma MF, van Helden SH, Mauritz GJ. Ultrasound for Distal Forearm Fracture: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155659. eCollection 2016. PMID 27196439
- Osterwalder J, Hoffmann B, Blaivas M, Horn R, Matchiner E, Dietrich CF. A Plea for a Paradigm Shift from X-Ray to Ultrasound in Adults: An Update for Emergency Physicians, General Practitioners, Orthopedists and Sports Medicine Physicians. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;15(14):1827. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141827. PMID 40722577
- Smith KM, Zimmerman E, Trotter Z, Wai S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Acute Pediatric Ankle Injuries. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Oct 1;41(10):e140-e145. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003439. Epub 2025 Jul 9. PMID 40629668
- Delniotis I, Bontinis V, Delniotis A, Bontinis A, Drakonaki EE, Ktenidis K, Galanis N. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Versus X-ray for Pediatric Upper Extremity Injuries: A Safe and Radiation-Free Alternative? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Oct 1;41(10):e156-e162. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003446. Epub 2025 Jul 11. PMID 40643022
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07728227 · 8.574.218 · Universal Trial Number (UTN)