Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07727135

Rapid or Ultra-rapid Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin on Hospital Presentation

No phase Interventional Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction Coronary Artery Disease Cardiovascular Diseases

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: 0/3-hour high-sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithm, 0/1-hour high-sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithm.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Coronary Syndrome, Acute, Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Denmark
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Danish Randomized Trial of Rapid or Ultra-rapid Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin on Hospital Presentation

Overview

People with chest pain are often tested for a heart attack using a blood test called high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn). Traditionally, this blood test is repeated 3 hours after the first sample. Newer guidelines recommend repeating the test after 1 hour instead, which may allow patients to receive a diagnosis and leave the hospital sooner. The purpose of the DanRUSH trial is to compare these two strategies: repeating the blood test after 1 hour versus after 3 hours in adults with suspected acute coronary syndrome. The study will evaluate whether the 1-hour strategy is as safe as the 3-hour strategy while reducing the length of hospital stay. DanRUSH is a nationwide, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted in emergency- and cardiology departments across Denmark. The results will help determine the best timing for blood testing in patients with suspected heart attack and improve future care for these patients.

Detailed description

Each year, approximately 80,000 individuals present to the Danish healthcare system with chest pain. Of these, around 25,000 are admitted to hospital and approximately 8,000 are diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) is the cornerstone biomarker for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and is essential for the rapid rule-in and rule-out of acute coronary syndromes. Because the diagnosis of myocardial infarction relies not only on troponin concentration but also on changes in troponin levels over time, serial blood sampling is required to distinguish acute myocardial injury from chronic elevations.

Advances in hs-cTn assay sensitivity have enabled progressively shorter intervals between serial blood sampling. Traditionally, most emergency departments have used a 0/3-hour algorithm, in which hs-cTn is measured at presentation and again after 3 hours. However, contemporary European guidelines recommend accelerated diagnostic pathways using a 0/1-hour or 0/2-hour algorithm.

The primary purpose of the DanRUSH trial is to determine whether shortening the interval between serial hs-cTn measurements from 3 hours to 1 hour is both safe and effective in adults presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

The primary safety endpoint is defined as the risk of new (missed or recurrent) myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death after dischage from the index hospitalization -of the 0/1-hour algorithm compared with the 0/3-hour algorithm. Efficacy will be assessed as hospital length of stay, defined as the time from presentation to discharge. The study aims to demonstrate that the 0/1-hour algorithm is non-inferior to the 0/3-hour algorithm with respect to safety while improving efficiency through shorter hospital stays.

The study is designed as a nationwide, pragmatic, open-label, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. Participating emergency- and cardiology departments in Denmark will sequentially and randomly transition from the conventional 0/3-hour hs-cTn algorithm to the 0/1-hour hs-cTn algorithm until all sites are exposed to the intervention. A study-specific order set in the electronic medical record will ensure the correct timing of serial blood sampling and facilitate identification of study participants. Relevant baseline and outcome information will be obtained from routinely collected data in the electronic medical record and Danish nationwide health registries.

The results of DanRUSH are expected to provide definitive randomized evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of the 0/1-hour hs-cTn algorithm. If the accelerated diagnostic strategy is shown to be safe, it may support broader implementation and improve patient flow by reducing unnecessary hospital stays. Conversely, if safety cannot be confirmed, the study may prevent widespread adoption of an insufficiently validated diagnostic strategy.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test 0/3-hour high-sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithm
    High-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements obtained at presentation and 3 hours after the initial sample as part of the conventional diagnostic strategy for suspected acute coronary syndrome.
  • Diagnostic test 0/1-hour high-sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithm
    High-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements obtained at presentation and 1 hour after the initial sample as part of the accelerated diagnostic strategy for suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Primary outcome measures

  • Safety outcome: New myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death [Time frame: From discharge from the index hospitalization until 30 days after discharge.]
  • Efficacy outcome: Length of hospital stay [Time frame: During the index hospitalization (from emergency department presentation until hospital discharge)]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
  • New myocardial infarction at 12 months [Time frame: From discharge from the index hospitalization until 12 months after discharge.]
  • All-cause mortality [Time frame: 30 days and 12 months following discharge]
  • Overall myocardial infarction rate [Time frame: 30 days and 12 months following discharge]
  • Diagnostic coronary angiography [Time frame: During the index hospitalization, at 30 days, and at 12 months after the index presentation]
  • Invasive treatment [Time frame: During the index hospitalization, at 30 days, and at 12 months after the index presentation]
  • Re-presentation to hospital [Time frame: 30 days and 12 months following discharge]
  • Re-hospitalization [Time frame: 30 days and 12 months following discharge]
  • Time to treatment initiation [Time frame: From emergency department presentation until initiation of treatment, assessed during the index hospitalization (up to 7 days)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years) presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with a clinical indication for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <18 years.
  • ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) identified on the presenting electrocardiogram and requiring immediate reperfusion therapy.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Diagnostic

Study locations

Denmark · 11 centers
  • Aalborg University Hospital — Aalborg
  • Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital — Bispebjerg
  • Esbjerg og Grindsted Sygehus — Esbjerg
  • Gødstrup Regional Hospital — Gødstrup
  • Herlev & Gentofte Hospital — Herlev
  • Nordsjællands Hospital — Hillerød
  • Amager & Hvidovre Hospital — Hvidovre
  • Nykøbing Falster County Hospital — Nykøbing Falster
  • … and 3 more centers

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07727135 · DanRUSH · 2024-12587-22218

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗