Pain During Infiltration Injection in Anterior Maxillary Region by Transcodent Painless Needle Tips Versus Regular Needle Tips
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Transcodent Painless Needle Tip, Conventional Dental Needle Tip.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Pain, Post Endodontic Pain. Basic parameters: 18 years — 60 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Comparison of Pain During Infiltration Injection in Anterior Maxillary Region by Transcodent Painless Needle Tips Versus Regular Needle Tips: a Split-mouth Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
Overview
This randomized split-mouth controlled clinical trial will compare pain experienced during anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia using Transcodent painless needle tips and conventional dental needle tips. Sixty adult patients requiring bilateral maxillary anterior infiltration anesthesia will receive injections with both needle types in a randomized order. Pain perception will be assessed immediately after each injection using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The study aims to determine whether the Transcodent needle tip reduces injection-related pain compared with a conventional needle tip, thereby improving patient comfort during routine dental procedures.
Detailed description
This randomized split-mouth controlled clinical trial aims to compare pain experienced during anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia using Transcodent painless needle tips versus conventional dental needle tips. Dental injection pain is a common source of anxiety and may negatively affect patient acceptance of dental treatment. Recent advances in needle design, including the three-edge lancet grinding bevel and silicone-coated cannula of the Transcodent needle, have been developed to reduce tissue resistance during penetration and improve patient comfort.
A total of 60 adult patients requiring bilateral maxillary anterior infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment will be recruited from the Department of Operative Dentistry, Saidu College of Dentistry, Swat. Eligible participants will receive two supraperiosteal injections, one with a Transcodent painless needle tip and one with a conventional needle tip, on opposite sides of the maxillary arch. The order of needle use and injection site will be randomized using a balanced block randomization method. Prior to injection, 20% benzocaine topical anesthetic gel will be applied for two minutes. Each injection will consist of 0.9 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine administered over 30 seconds by the same operator.
Pain perception will be assessed immediately after each injection using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The primary outcome is the difference in mean VAS pain scores between Transcodent and conventional needle tips. Data will be analyzed using paired statistical methods appropriate for the distribution of the data.
The findings of this study will provide local evidence regarding the effectiveness of Transcodent painless needle tips in reducing injection-related pain during maxillary infiltration anesthesia and may contribute to improving patient comfort and reducing dental anxiety during routine dental procedures.
Interventions
- Device Transcodent Painless Needle Tip
A dental injection needle with a three-edge lancet grinding bevel and silicone-coated cannula designed to reduce tissue resistance and injection pain during anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia. - Device Conventional Dental Needle Tip
A standard dental injection needle with a conventional bevel design used for anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
Primary outcome measures
- Pain Score During Anterior Maxillary Infiltration Injection [Time frame: Immediately after each injection]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Adults aged 18 to 60 years. Patients requiring bilateral maxillary anterior infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment.
Patients undergoing endodontic procedures involving maxillary canines or premolars.
Presence of healthy maxillary teeth on both sides suitable for infiltration anesthesia.
Individuals with no systemic disease or neurological disorder affecting pain perception.
Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.
Both male and female participants.
Exclusion criteria
Pregnant or lactating women. Use of analgesics, sedatives, or other pain-modifying medications within the previous 12 hours.
Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics, benzocaine, lidocaine, or epinephrine.
Presence of active infection, inflammation, swelling, or pathology at the injection site.
Severe dental anxiety, needle phobia, or inability to cooperate with study procedures.
Individuals unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07703410 · SCD-OPER-2026-06