Menu
Recruiting NCT07700108

Lidocaine Patch vs Intradermal Lidocaine for Epidural Needle Insertion Pain

Phase II Interventional Needle Phobia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Lidocaine patch 4%.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Needle Phobia. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating Pain During Epidural Tuohy Needle Insertion After 4% Lidocaine Patch or Intradermal Lidocaine Injection in Parturient Women Requesting Epidural Analgesia

Overview

Needle phobia is a barrier for receiving appropriate care during pregnancy and can lead to complications of the mother and fetus that could easily be avoided. Needle phobia can affect routine prenatal care, increase the demand for general anesthesia during c-section, and increase post-op pain. During epidural placement, providers use local anesthetic in various methods to numb the area where the needle will be inserted. Pain from these anesthetic administrations can increase needle phobia and their side effects. One use of local anesthetic is the lidocaine patch, and studies have shown it is effective in reducing pain level in patients \[6, Firmani\]. The transdermal lidocaine patch may lower the physical pain and mental effects of needle phobia in pregnant women and lower the side effects from that. Although lidocaine patch may take more time to numb the skin, a high number of expecting mothers will not require an epidural for labor analgesia right away. Therefore, administration of lidocaine patch might be an effective alternative. Pregnant women needing epidural placement will be randomized into three groups, the lidocaine patch group, intradermal anesthetic group, or use of both to determine the effectiveness of the lidocaine patch compared to the intradermal administration.

Detailed description

Needle phobia is a significant barrier to receiving medical care and may negatively affect prenatal care, obstetric outcomes, and patient experience. During epidural placement for labor analgesia, local anesthetic is commonly administered through intradermal injection to reduce pain from Tuohy needle insertion. However, the injection itself may cause pain and increase anxiety, particularly in patients with needle phobia.

Transdermal lidocaine patches provide a needle-free method of local anesthesia and have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing procedural pain in other clinical settings. This approach may decrease pain and anxiety associated with epidural placement while improving patient comfort.

This prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot study will compare the effectiveness of a 4% lidocaine patch with standard intradermal lidocaine infiltration for reducing pain during epidural Tuohy needle insertion in laboring patients. Participants will be randomized into three groups: intradermal lidocaine alone, lidocaine patch alone, or combined lidocaine patch and intradermal lidocaine. Outcomes will include procedural pain response, vocalization and withdrawal reflex, patient-reported pain scores, hemodynamic changes, and patient satisfaction.

Interventions

  • Drug Lidocaine patch 4%
    4% lidocaine transdermal patch applied to the L3-L5 lumbar region at least 30 minutes prior to epidural placement. The patch remains in place for a minimum of 30 minutes and is removed immediately prior to epidural needle insertion.

Primary outcome measures

  • Composite Behavioral Pain Response During Tuohy Needle Insertion (CPOT-Based) [Time frame: During Tuohy needle insertion (immediately at time of epidural placement procedure)]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Patient-Reported Pain Score During Epidural Placement (NRS) [Time frame: Immediately after Tuohy needle insertion during epidural placement]
  • Hemodynamic Response to Epidural Needle Insertion (Blood Pressure) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-insertion) and immediately following Tuohy needle insertion]
  • Patient Satisfaction With Epidural Procedure [Time frame: At completion of epidural procedure (same visit, immediately after procedure ends)]
  • Hemodynamic Response to Epidural Needle Insertion (Heart Rate) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-insertion) and immediately following Tuohy needle insertion]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Age 18 years or older Parturient women requesting neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia (epidural or combined spinal-epidural) for vaginal or cesarean delivery Ability to provide informed consent in English

Exclusion criteria

Less than 30 minutes of lidocaine patch placement prior to epidural placement Administration of opioids within 4 hours before study enrollment Intravenous magnesium sulfate administration within the previous 24 hours Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) Neurocardiogenic signs or symptoms (e.g., dizziness, lightheadedness, bradycardia, or syncope) during intravenous cannulation Cervical dilation greater than 6 cm (if in labor) Spinal anesthesia Chronic pain condition Opioid use disorder Intrauterine fetal demise Prisoner status

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Hospitals — Columbus

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07700108 · 2024H0309

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗