VIDEO LEARNING FOR EMPATHY, ETHICS AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: 360 Degree Virtual Reality Video, 2D Standard Video.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Family Witnessed Resuscitation, Empathy Education, Ethics Nursing, Education Nursing. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
THE EFFECT OF A VIDEO BASED DIGITAL LEARNING INTERVENTION ON NURSING STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF EMPATHY, ETHICAL SENSITIVITY, AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION IN THEIR PATIENT PERSPECTIVE EXPERIENCES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Overview
This clinical trial (randomized controlled experimental study) aims to learn about the effects of presenting the family-witnessed CPR process from a patient's perspective through 360° virtual reality and 2D video within second-year nursing students. The primary question(s) / hypotheses it aims to answer are: * H1: Will the content validity ratio of the developed scenario be above 0.80? * H2: Is the increase in empathy scores (pre-test/post-test difference) of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups? * H3: Is the increase in ethical sensitivity scores of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups? * H4: Is the change in perception scores toward family-witnessed CPR more positive in the 360° VR group compared to the other groups, and is their mean SUS (System Usability Scale) score at or above the acceptability threshold of 70? * H5: Is the VES (Video Engagement Skale) score of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher than that of the 2D video group? Researchers will compare the 360° immersive video (360° VR) group, the 2-dimensional (2D) video group, and the control group to see if there are effects on empathy, ethical sensitivity, perception of risks-benefits of family presence, self-confidence regarding family presence, video engagement, and system usability. Participants will be asked to: * Watch the scenario reenactment involving a family-witnessed CPR process, recorded via a 360° camera (in either 360° VR or 2D format, depending on their assigned group). * Complete data collection tools consisting of the Introductory Information Form, "Jefferson Scale of Empathy", "Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire", "Family Presence Risk-Benefit Scale and Family Presence Self-Confidence Scale", "System Usability Scale (SUS-TR)", and "Video Engagement Skale(VES)".
Interventions
- Behavioral 360 Degree Virtual Reality Video
Immersive 360-degree virtual reality video scenario of family-witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation presented from a patient perspective. - Behavioral 2D Standard Video
Standard 2-dimensional video scenario of family-witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation presented from a patient perspective.
Primary outcome measures
- Change in Jefferson Scale of Empathy Scores [Time frame: Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)]
- Change in Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores [Time frame: Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)]
- Change in Family Presence Risk Benefit Scale and Family Presence Self Confidence Scale Scores [Time frame: Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)]
- System Usability Scale Scores [Time frame: Right after the intervention (Post-test)]
- Video Engagement Scale Scores [Time frame: Right after the intervention (Post-test)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Being a second-year undergraduate nursing student
- Volunteering to participate in the study and signing the informed consent form
- Not having participated in a similar virtual reality or family-witnessed CPR study before
Exclusion criteria
- Having a diagnosed neurological or psychiatric disorder that prevents using virtual reality glasses (such as epilepsy, severe vertigo, or motion sickness)
- Having uncorrected visual or hearing impairments
- Not completing all stages of the study (pre-test, intervention, or post-test)
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Other
Study locations
Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
- Sakarya University — Sakarya
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07692568 · E-61923333-050.99-597961