Derivation and Validation of the Fungal Pneumonia Assessment and Likelihood Predictor Score
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: FUNGAL-P Score Assessment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Pneumonia, Fungal Pneumonia, Aspergillosis Pneumonia, Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Basic parameters: 18 years — 90 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Italy
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The FUNGAL-P study is a single-center observational study designed to derive and validate a clinical prediction score for the early identification of fungal pneumonia in adult patients presenting with pneumonia. The study includes a retrospective derivation cohort and a prospective validation cohort of patients undergoing microbiological evaluation of lower respiratory tract samples. Clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological, and treatment-related variables associated with fungal pneumonia will be analyzed to identify independent predictors of fungal infection. These predictors will be combined to develop the FUNGAL-P score. The derived score will subsequently be evaluated in a prospective validation cohort to assess its diagnostic performance, calibration, and clinical utility. The ultimate goal is to facilitate earlier recognition of fungal pneumonia and support timely diagnostic testing and antifungal treatment in patients presenting to the Emergency Department or hospital with pneumonia.
Detailed description
Fungal pneumonia is an increasingly recognized cause of severe respiratory infection and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis remains challenging because clinical manifestations are often nonspecific and conventional diagnostic criteria may not be readily applicable in emergency care settings. Delayed recognition may result in delayed diagnostic investigations and initiation of targeted antifungal therapy.
The FUNGAL-P study is a no-profit, single-center observational study conducted at Careggi University Hospital (Florence, Italy). The study was designed to derive and validate a clinical prediction rule for the early identification of fungal pneumonia or fungal-bacterial coinfection among adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
The study consists of two sequential phases.
Retrospective derivation phase
The derivation cohort includes adult patients with microbiologically confirmed pneumonia diagnosed between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023. Eligible patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial aspirate, or endotracheal aspirate collection within 48 hours of hospital presentation. Microbiological investigations included fungal and bacterial cultures, galactomannan testing, molecular assays for Aspergillus species and Pneumocystis jirovecii, and multiplex molecular respiratory pathogen testing.
Patients with microbiologically confirmed fungal pneumonia constituted the study group, whereas patients with bacterial or viral pneumonia served as controls. Cases of fungal-bacterial coinfection were classified as fungal pneumonia. Patients without microbiological identification of a pathogen were excluded.
Prospective validation phase
The validation cohort includes consecutive adult patients with pneumonia enrolled between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Patients underwent routine microbiological investigations according to standard clinical practice. The performance of the derived FUNGAL-P score was evaluated prospectively without influencing clinical decision-making.
Outcome definition
The primary study outcome is fungal pneumonia, including infections caused by Aspergillus species, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and other fungal pathogens, as well as fungal-bacterial coinfections. Diagnosis is based on an integrated assessment of clinical presentation, radiological findings, microbiological results, fungal biomarkers, and molecular testing results. Final case adjudication includes review of clinical follow-up data, imaging studies, microbiological findings, and treatment decisions.
Data collection
Demographic characteristics, medical history, comorbidities, fungal infection risk factors, vital signs, laboratory findings, radiological data, microbiological results, administered treatments, and clinical outcomes are collected for all participants.
Statistical analysis
Independent predictors of fungal pneumonia are identified using multivariable logistic regression. Candidate variables are selected based on prior evidence and univariable analyses. Predictors retained in the final model are incorporated into the FUNGAL-P score. Diagnostic performance is evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Calibration is assessed using calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation is performed using bootstrap resampling, and clinical utility is evaluated through decision curve analysis.
Primary Objective
To derive a clinical prediction score for fungal pneumonia or fungal-bacterial coinfection in adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
Secondary Objectives
To prospectively validate the FUNGAL-P score. To assess score calibration and discrimination. To determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
To evaluate the clinical utility of the score for identifying patients at increased risk of fungal pneumonia.
Interventions
- Other FUNGAL-P Score Assessment
Observational assessment of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and microbiological variables used to derive and validate the FUNGAL-P clinical prediction score for fungal pneumonia. No study-specific intervention was performed and patient management was not influenced by the study.
Primary outcome measures
- Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the FUNGAL-P score [Time frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the FUNGAL-P score [Time frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)]
- Sensitivity and specificity of the FUNGAL-P score [Time frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)]
- Calibration of the FUNGAL-P score [Time frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)]
- Clinical utility of the FUNGAL-P score [Time frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years.
- Presentation to the Emergency Department or hospital with pneumonia.
- Pneumonia defined according to IDSA/ATS criteria as the presence of at least two clinical signs or symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (temperature <36.0°C or >38.0°C, respiratory rate >20 breaths/min, oxygen saturation <90% on room air, arterial PaO₂ <60 mmHg, cough, sputum production, white blood cell count <4,000/μL or >10,000/μL, or bandemia >10%) together with radiographic evidence of a new pulmonary infiltrate or cavitary lesion.
- Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial aspirate (BAS), or endotracheal aspirate (ETA) performed within 48 hours of hospital presentation.
- Modified Rankin Scale score <5.
- Availability of microbiological investigations for identification of fungal, bacterial, or viral pathogens.
- Provision of informed consent, when required by applicable regulations and ethics committee approval.
Exclusion criteria
- Refusal or withdrawal of informed consent.
- Age <18 years or >90 years.
- Pregnancy.
- Expected life expectancy <3 months.
- Hospital-acquired pneumonia with onset >48 hours after hospital admission.
- Modified Rankin Scale score ≥5.
- Absence of microbiological diagnostic evaluation.
- No identified bacterial, fungal, or viral pathogen after microbiological investigations.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Italy · 1 center
- Careggi University Hospital — Florence
Publications
- 1. Esandi M, Magnasco L, Farina EC, et al. Early diagnosis of candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: prospective study. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(9):1534-1540. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1825-3 2. Wang K, Wang Y, Liu M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors for invasive Candida infections in a medical ICU. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(14):e38338. doi:10.1097/MD.000000000
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07681583 · CEAVC 29602