Menu
Recruiting NCT07679620

Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS

No phase Interventional Sexual Health Education

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: iCHAMPSS 2.0.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Sexual Health Education. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Overview

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.

Interventions

  • Behavioral iCHAMPSS 2.0
    iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education. iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features: 1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system 2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Rate of implementation of the EBP [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP) [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]
  • Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey [Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Exclusion criteria

  • not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston — Houston

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07679620 · HSC-SPH-24-0672 · R01HD111699

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗