Effects of Clinical Based Versus Synchronized Telerehabilitation on Pain, Exercise Adherence, and Functional Disability Among Patients With Grade-II Cervical Spondylosis.
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Group A: Clinical Based Rehabilitation, Group B: Synchronized Telerehabilitation.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Grade-II Cervical Spondylosis. Basic parameters: 45 years — 64 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Pakistan
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of clinical-based rehabilitation and synchronized telerehabilitation on pain, exercise adherence, and functional disability in patients with Grade-II cervical spondylosis. A total of 52 participants will be randomly allocated into two parallel groups. Both groups will receive a standardized 6-week rehabilitation program, including cervical mobility exercises, strengthening, isometric exercises, stretching, and Mulligan self-mobilization techniques. The clinical group will receive in-person physiotherapy, while the telerehabilitation group will undergo real-time supervised sessions via video conferencing. Outcome measures will include pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), functional disability (Neck Disability Index), and exercise adherence (Exercise Adherence Rating Scale), assessed at baseline and post-intervention. The study aims to determine whether synchronized telerehabilitation is as effective as clinical-based rehabilitation and may provide a more accessible alternative for delivering physiotherapy care.
Detailed description
Cervical spondylosis is a common degenerative condition of the cervical spine characterized by disc degeneration, osteophyte formation, and reduced cervical mobility, leading to neck pain and functional limitations. Grade-II cervical spondylosis represents a stage where patients are symptomatic but remain suitable for conservative management. Physiotherapy, particularly exercise-based rehabilitation, is widely used to improve pain, mobility, and functional capacity through strengthening, stretching, and neuromuscular re-education.
Clinical-based rehabilitation provides in-person physiotherapy with direct supervision, manual guidance, and real-time correction of exercises. However, access to such care is often limited due to barriers such as travel distance, cost, and time constraints. Synchronized telerehabilitation, delivered through real-time video conferencing, offers a potential alternative by enabling remote supervision, feedback, and patient engagement while maintaining continuity of care.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of clinical-based rehabilitation and synchronized telerehabilitation in patients with Grade-II cervical spondylosis. A total of 52 participants will be randomly assigned to two parallel groups. Both groups will receive a standardized 6-week rehabilitation program consisting of cervical range-of-motion exercises, deep cervical muscle strengthening, isometric exercises, stretching of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae, and Mulligan self-mobilization techniques (SNAGs). The clinical group will attend in-person sessions, while the telerehabilitation group will receive real-time supervised sessions via video conferencing.
Outcome measures include pain intensity assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional disability measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and exercise adherence evaluated using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), assessed at baseline and post-intervention.This study aims to determine whether synchronized telerehabilitation is comparable to clinical-based rehabilitation and may provide an accessible, cost-effective alternative for delivering physiotherapy care
Interventions
- Other Group A: Clinical Based Rehabilitation
The first intervention is clinical-based rehabilitation, delivered through in-person physiotherapy sessions in an outpatient clinical setting. Participants will receive supervised treatment three times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes. All sessions will be conducted by a qualified physiotherapist who will provide direct monitoring, guidance, and correction to ensure proper execution of therapy. This conventional rehabilitation approach emphasizes face-t - Other Group B: Synchronized Telerehabilitation
The second intervention is synchronized telerehabilitation, delivered through real-time video conferencing sessions. Participants will receive supervised physiotherapy remotely three times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes. A qualified physiotherapist will provide live instruction, monitoring, and feedback to ensure correct performance and safety during exercises. This approach replicates the structure of clinical-based rehabilitation while eliminating t
Primary outcome measures
- Pain Intensity [Time frame: Measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (post-intervention completion).]
- Functional Disability [Time frame: Measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6 weeks post-intervention completion.]
- Exercise Adherence [Time frame: Measured at baseline and at 6 weeks post-intervention completion.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Middle age adults (45-64) years
- Both gender ( male and female )
- Clinical daignosis of cervical spondylosis grade 2
- Mild to moderate pain on NPRS
- Sub acute stage ( 2-6 weeks) of grade 2 cervical spondylosis
- Able to follow instructions and give informed consent (cognitively able) Neurologically stable
Exclusion criteria
- Prior cervical spine surgery within the last 1 months or cervical instability.
- Inflammtory or systemic rheumatologic disease affecting the cervical spine (e.g., active rheumatoid arthritis ) or infection, tumor, fracture.
- Severe cardiopulmonary or other medical comorbidity that contraindicates exercise (unstable angina, uncontriolled hypertension, recent MI)
- Severe hearing or visual impairment
- No smoking and daibetic history
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Pakistan · 1 center
- University of Biological and Applied Sciences — Lahore
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07679373 · UBAS/ERB/26/04/034