Cholecystitis Outcomes in the Investigation of Cholecystectomy Versus EUS-GBD
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: LCC, EUS-GBD.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Acute Cholecystitis. Basic parameters: from 75 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Finland
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Recurrence of Acute Cholecystitis After EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Versus Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Acute cholecystitis is common in elderly patients and becomes more frequent with increasing age. Standard treatment is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC), but operative treatment may be associated with increased risk in older patients with substantial comorbidity or reduced tolerance of general anesthesia. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is a minimally invasive internal drainage procedure performed through the stomach or duodenum using endoscopic ultrasound guidance and a lumen-apposing metal stent. This approach may provide an alternative to operative treatment in selected elderly patients. The CHOICE study (CHolecystitis Outcomes in the Investigation of Cholecystectomy versus EUS-GBD) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing EUS-GBD with LCC in patients aged 75 years or older with acute cholecystitis. Participants are randomly assigned to undergo either laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder or endoscopic ultrasound-guided internal gallbladder drainage. The objective of the study is to determine whether EUS-GBD provides clinically acceptable outcomes compared with standard operative treatment in this patient population. Participants are followed using medical record review and scheduled follow-up contacts.
Detailed description
The CHOICE trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted in Finnish hospitals. The trial compares endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.
LCC is the standard operative treatment for acute cholecystitis. In elderly patients, clinical decision-making may be affected by comorbidity, frailty, reduced physiological reserve, and limited tolerance of general anesthesia. EUS-GBD is an internal drainage procedure performed under endoscopic ultrasound guidance using a lumen-apposing metal stent. The procedure is intended to achieve gallbladder drainage without surgical removal of the gallbladder.
After enrolment, participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either LCC or EUS-GBD using centralized computer-generated allocation through REDCap. Both treatment groups receive standard antimicrobial treatment according to local clinical practice.
LCC is performed according to the standard operative practice of each participating hospital using a laparoscopic approach. EUS-GBD is performed under propofol sedation with endoscopic ultrasound guidance. The preferred access route is transduodenal, with transgastric access used when required by anatomical or technical factors. A lumen-apposing metal stent is placed to create internal drainage between the gallbladder and the gastrointestinal tract.
In the EUS-GBD group, stent management is planned according to the study protocol and clinical circumstances. In general, the lumen-apposing metal stent may be replaced with a plastic pigtail stent after maturation of the fistulous tract. In patients with limited life expectancy or other clinical considerations, the lumen-apposing metal stent may be left in place at the discretion of the treating physician.
Study data are collected prospectively using electronic case report forms in a secure REDCap database. Data collection includes baseline clinical characteristics, procedural details, treatment delivery, subsequent interventions, and follow-up information obtained from medical records and scheduled follow-up contacts. Participants are identified in the study database by study ID, and personal identifiers are not used in the analysis dataset.
The primary analysis follows the intention-to-treat principle. Additional analyses may be performed to account for cases in which allocated treatment is not delivered as planned or in which treatment is changed after randomization. The trial includes planned safety monitoring according to predefined criteria.
The purpose of the trial is to generate prospective comparative evidence on whether EUS-GBD can be incorporated into the treatment pathway of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis as a less invasive alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in routine hospital practice.
Interventions
- Procedure LCC
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is performed according to each participating hospital's standard operative practice. Briefly, a four-port laparoscopic technique is used. The gallbladder is retracted at the fundus, and the cystic duct and cystic artery are dissected as separate structures. The posterior aspect of the gallbladder is dissected from the liver bed to achieve the critical view of safety. After this has been confirmed, the cystic duct and cystic artery are clipped - Procedure EUS-GBD
EUS-GBD is performed under propofol sedation without airway protection. After sedation, the echoendoscope is advanced through the esophagus into the stomach and duodenum. The gallbladder is identified by ultrasonography, and the optimal site for LAMS placement is determined. The preferred approach is transduodenal access with cholecystoduodenostomy. If safe cystotome puncture cannot be achieved through this route, a transgastric approach with cholecystogastrostomy is used. The operator selects t
Primary outcome measures
- Recurrence rate of cholecystitis within 24 months [Time frame: From the index intervention to 24 months after the index intervention]
- Length of index hospital stay [Time frame: From hospital admission for acute cholecystitis to discharge from the index hospitalization, assessed up to 90 days]
Secondary outcome measures (9)
- Duration of antibiotic treatment [Time frame: From hospital admission for acute cholecystitis to completion of antibiotic treatment for the index episode, assessed up to 90 days]
- Length of intensive care unit stay [Time frame: From the index intervention to hospital discharge from the index hospitalization, assessed up to 90 days]
- Post-interventional complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification [Time frame: From the index intervention to 90 days after the index intervention]
- Organ-specific postoperative complications [Time frame: From the index intervention to 90 days after the index intervention]
- Procedure-specific complications [Time frame: From the index intervention to 90 days after the index intervention]
- Ninety-day mortality [Time frame: From the index intervention to 90 days after the index intervention]
- Long-term mortality [Time frame: From the index intervention to 10 years after the index intervention]
- Long-term recurrence of cholecystitis after 24 months [Time frame: From 24 months after the index intervention to 10 years after the index intervention]
- Direct hospital costs [Time frame: From hospital admission for acute cholecystitis to 24 months after the index intervention]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age 75 years or older.
- Radiologically confirmed acute cholecystitis.
- Elevated inflammatory parameters.
- Able to provide written informed consent.
- Able to complete follow-up questionnaires.
Exclusion criteria
- Age under 75 years.
- Considered unfit for surgery.
- ASA physical status classification below III.
- Unwillingness to participate in follow-up assessments.
- Lack of written informed consent.
- Clinical Frailty Scale score of 8 or higher.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Finland · 1 center
- Oulu University Hospital — Oulu
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07678541 · 29/2025 · EETTMK: 29/2025