Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07667946

Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars

No phase Interventional Clinical Performance

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Anatomical cavity design preparation, Butt joint cavity design preparation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Clinical Performance. Basic parameters: 20 years — 45 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars With Complex Cavities: An 18 Month Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different cavity designs on the clinical performance of 3D-printed resin composite partial-coverage restorations in vital molars with complex cavities over an 18-month follow-up period.

Detailed description

Despite these material advancements, growing evidence indicates that cavity preparation design exerts a greater influence on the clinical performance of indirect restorations than material selection alone. However, current evidence regarding preparation design is predominantly derived from in vitro studies and remains inadequately validated under clinical conditions, particularly in vital molars. Although recent randomized clinical trials have begun to address this gap, available data remain limited and largely confined to endodontically treated teeth. Therefore, a rigorously designed randomized clinical trial is warranted to evaluate the influence of different cavity preparation designs on the clinical performance of indirect restorations in vital molars.

Interventions

  • Procedure Anatomical cavity design preparation
    Cavity preparation design for adhesive restoration
  • Procedure Butt joint cavity design preparation
    Cavity preparation design for adhesive restoration

Primary outcome measures

  • Fracture [Time frame: 18 Months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, wear/anatomic form, secondary caries and surface texture [Time frame: 18 Months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aging 20-45 years.
  • Healthy males and females
  • Patients with good oral hygiene
  • Patients presenting with at least one eligible permanent molar requiring a partial-coverage restoration.
  • Patients willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits for 18 months.
  • Permanent maxillary or mandibular molars.
  • Vital teeth with a positive response to cold thermal testing.
  • Complex Large or severely compromised cavities resulting from primary or secondary caries (ICDAS 5 or 6) and/or replacement of large defective restorations with at least 2 missing cavity walls requiring overlay restorations
  • Well-formed and fully erupted in normal functional occlusion with natural antagonist and adjacent teeth.
  • Absence of any radiographic, periodontal or periapical changes.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants with general/systemic illness.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Concomitant participation in another research study.
  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with study visits and procedures.
  • Heavy bruxism or other parafunctional habits
  • Known allergic reactions against any components of the used materials
  • Patients receiving orthodontic treatment.
  • Poor oral hygiene or high caries activity.
  • Non vital teeth.
  • Hypersensitive teeth.
  • Teeth with prior endodontic treatment.
  • Teeth with spontaneous pain or signs/symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Teeth with advanced periodontal disease or mobility.
  • Teeth with a history of direct or indirect pulp capping procedure.
  • Teeth with vertical root fractures or cracked tooth syndrome

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07667946 · Effect of Cavity Designs

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗