Menu
Recruiting NCT07666204

Using Sensorimotor Reorganization Following Upper Limb Amputation to Improve Prosthetic Control

No phase Interventional Amputation of Upper Limb Agenesis of Upper Limb

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Caracterisation, Mapping, Phantom sensations, Classification.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Amputation of Upper Limb, Agenesis of Upper Limb. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Amputation of an upper limb results in a disruption of the sensorimotor loop and a reorganization of the nervous system, leading to the emergence of a phantom limb and the adaptation of compensatory motor strategies. This project aims to leverage these phenomena (induced sensations, phantom mobility, and compensations) to improve control, sensory feedback, and the appropriation of prostheses, in order to reduce cognitive load and musculoskeletal disorders.

Interventions

  • Other Caracterisation
    The objective of this phase is to identify, from a population of individuals with upper limb amputations, a sufficient number of participants who experience non-painful phenomena related to their phantom limb (sensations, mobility, etc.) prior to the subsequent phases. This phase takes the form of a semi-structured individual interview conducted by one of the study investigators.
  • Other Mapping
    The objective of this phase is to study the phenomenon of induced phantom sensations in individuals who reported experiencing such sensations during the previous phase. This phase involves a systematic exploration of the areas of the residual limb whose stimulation induces non-painful phantom sensations, as well as the type of sensations thus induced.
  • Other Phantom sensations
    The goal of this phase is to determine whether stimulation of the residual limb that induces sensations in the phantom limb can help people with lower-limb amputations use their prostheses more effectively.
  • Other Classification
    The objective of this phase is to characterize the influence of voluntary movements of the residual limb on the myoelectric activity associated with phantom limb mobility. Myoelectric activity and cognitive load will be assessed
  • Other Prosthetic control
    The objective of this phase is to evaluate the performance of a prosthetic control method based on phantom limb movement in individuals with upper limb amputations. The principle behind this method is to control the movements of the prosthesis using the corresponding movements of the phantom limb, by utilizing the myoelectric activity that can be measured on the residual limb during voluntary phantom limb movements.
  • Other motor compensations
    The objective of this phase is to characterize and quantify the compensatory movements associated with the use of a conventional myoelectric upper limb prosthesis. The participant will perform the manipulation tasks defined in the SHAP method, as well as the clothespin displacement test.
  • Other Use of motor reorganization and compensation
    The objective of this phase is to evaluate the performance of a prosthesis control method based on the compensatory movements associated with the use of an upper limb prosthesis. During this phase, participants will not use their personal prostheses but rather an experimental prosthesis developed by the investigators specifically for this study. The experimental prosthesis will be programmed to implement the control method based on compensatory movements, which is the focus of this evaluation.

Primary outcome measures

  • Characterization of phantom limb [Time frame: Baseline (Phase 1 session) ; optional repeat assessment at 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • NASA TLX Score [Time frame: Administered at the end of each experimental sequence, up to 6 months]
  • Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) [Time frame: At each evaluation session, up to 6 month]
  • Clothespin Relocation Test (CRT) [Time frame: At each evaluation session, up to 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • people aged 18 or more
  • amputation or agenesis of one uper limb, above the wrist or higher
  • understanding of the French language and the ability to express onself in that language (for semi-structured interviews)
  • affiliation to a social security programm

Exclusion criteria

  • history of progressive psychiatric or neurological disorders or disorders with residual effects
  • pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • minor
  • an adult under legal guardianship
  • pain influencing movement (trunk, residual limb, phantom limb, contralateral limb)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Basic science

Study locations

France · 2 centers
  • Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Filière Locomoteur — Nancy
  • Fondation Saint-Hélier — Rennes

Publications

  • Hussaini A, Hill W, Kyberd P. Clinical evaluation of the refined clothespin relocation test: A pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Oct;43(5):485-491. doi: 10.1177/0309364619843779. Epub 2019 Jul 2. PMID 31264508
  • Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. PMID 15676628
  • Chateaux M, Rossel O, Verite F, Nicol C, Touillet A, Paysant J, Jarrasse N, De Graaf JB. New insights into muscle activity associated with phantom hand movements in transhumeral amputees. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Aug 30;18:1443833. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1443833. eCollection 2024. PMID 39281369
  • Rossel O, Chateaux M, Jarrassé N, Vérité F, Touillet A, Nicol C, Paysant J, and De Graaf JB (2023). Phantom movement training without classifier performance feedback improves mobilization ability while maintaining EMG pattern classification. IEEE Transitions on Medical Robotics and Bionics 5(1): 133-142.
  • Wu CW, Kaas JH. Spinal cord atrophy and reorganization of motoneuron connections following long-standing limb loss in primates. Neuron. 2000 Dec;28(3):967-78. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00167-7. PMID 11163280
  • Wu CW, Kaas JH. The effects of long-standing limb loss on anatomical reorganization of the somatosensory afferents in the brainstem and spinal cord. Somatosens Mot Res. 2002;19(2):153-63. doi: 10.1080/08990220220133261. PMID 12088390
  • Qi HX, Stewart Phillips W, Kaas JH. Connections of neurons in the lumbar ventral horn of spinal cord are altered after long-standing limb loss in a macaque monkey. Somatosens Mot Res. 2004 Sep-Dec;21(3-4):229-39. doi: 10.1080/08990220400012588. PMID 15763908
  • Bekrater-Bodmann R, Foell J, Diers M, Kamping S, Rance M, Kirsch P, Trojan J, Fuchs X, Bach F, Cakmak HK, Maass H, Flor H. The importance of synchrony and temporal order of visual and tactile input for illusory limb ownership experiences - an FMRI study applying virtual reality. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 31;9(1):e87013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087013. eCollection 2014. PMID 24498012

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07666204 · 2026-A00233-48

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗