Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07628647

Living Well With Brain Cancer: A Group-Based Intervention to Promote Whole-Person Well-Being

No phase Interventional Brain Cancer

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Group Self-Management Sessions, Educational Materials Only.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Brain Cancer. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Pilot Study of the Living Well With Brain Cancer Intervention

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the newly designed group self-management program is feasible to conduct and improves mental and behavioral health outcomes compared to a control group in people diagnosed with brain cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is it feasible to conduct this program? * Does the new group self-management program improve behavioral health outcomes more than in the control group that will not be in a group setting?

Interventions

  • Behavioral Group Self-Management Sessions
    Our targeted self-management intervention will be delivered virtually through eight 90-minute sessions over a 3-4-month period using materials adapted from previous focus groups of people with brain cancer and an expert design panel. A nurse educator and peer educator will facilitate the virtual sessions. The content covers topics focused on how to improve the quality of life in people diagnosed with brain cancer.
  • Other Educational Materials Only
    Self-management content specifically designed for people with brain cancer will be uploaded into a learning management system. The content will be broken up into modules that will be unlocked at the same frequency as the self-management group sessions arm. There are no group sessions involved, and there are no nurse or peer educators to lead the participants through this content.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change from Baseline of Overall Score from the RAND 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) [Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
  • Change from Baseline in Score of NIH Toolbox Item Bank v3.0 - Perceived Stress [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention]
  • Change from Baseline in Score of Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Positive Affect and Well-Being [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention]
  • Change from Baseline of score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Depression [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention]
  • Change from Baseline in Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Fatigue - Short Form [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention]
  • Overall Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Upper Extremity Function and Lower Extremity Function [Time frame: Baseline]
  • Overall score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Cognitive Function - Short Form and Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol - Short Form [Time frame: Baseline]
  • Change from Baseline in Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.1 - Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities - Short Form [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention]
  • Change from Baseline in Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance - Short Form [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention]
  • Change from Baseline of Score from PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 - Self Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Managing Symptoms - Short Form 8a [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention]
  • Survival [Time frame: Immediate post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently living in the United States
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Confirmed diagnosis of a malignant brain tumor including diffuse gliomas, World Health Organization (WHO) grades II, III, and IV (either by directly sharing their pathology report or confirmation from their prescribing treating provider)
  • Treating prescribing provider who follows regularly with participant

Exclusion criteria

  • <1 month since initial diagnosis and/or <1 month since surgical resection
  • Enrollment in hospice
  • Significant physical or cognitive disabilities that prohibit involvement using our clinician's judgement as a self-management expert, with consultation with personal clinician if needed
  • Currently receiving psychiatric treatment for a serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia)
  • Not able to communicate in English at a conversational level

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

United States · 2 centers
  • University of Colorado Anschutz — Aurora
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center — Cleveland

Publications

  • Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications; 2013.
  • Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment. Research & Evaluation. 2001;7(17): 137-146.
  • Gruber-Baldini AL, Velozo C, Romero S, Shulman LM. Validation of the PROMIS(R) measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions. Qual Life Res. 2017 Jul;26(7):1915-1924. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1527-3. Epub 2017 Feb 26. PMID 28239781
  • Gabel N, Altshuler DB, Brezzell A, Briceno EM, Boileau NR, Miklja Z, Kluin K, Ferguson T, McMurray K, Wang L, Smith SR, Carlozzi NE, Hervey-Jumper SL. Health Related Quality of Life in Adult Low and High-Grade Glioma Patients Using the National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Neuro-QOL Assessments. Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 15;10:212. doi: 10 PMID 30930834
  • Gershon RC, Lai JS, Bode R, Choi S, Moy C, Bleck T, Miller D, Peterman A, Cella D. Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Qual Life Res. 2012 Apr;21(3):475-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9958-8. Epub 2011 Aug 27. PMID 21874314
  • Bunevicius A. Reliability and validity of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with brain tumors: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 4;15(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0665-1. PMID 28472964
  • Blixen C, Perzynski A, Kanuch S, Dawson N, Kaiser D, Lawless ME, Seeholzer E, Sajatovic M. Training peer educators to promote self-management skills in people with serious mental illness (SMI) and diabetes (DM) in a primary health care setting. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Apr;16(2):127-37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000176. Epub 2014 Apr 7. PMID 24703014
  • Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103-15. PMID 1100130

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07628647 · 25-2124 · HT9425-24-1-0883

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗