Menu
Recruiting NCT07628374

Effect of Sensorimotor Training Versus Dual-task Training

No phase Interventional Stroke

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Sensorimotor Training, Dual-Task Training, Conventional Physical Therapy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke. Basic parameters: 40 years — 60 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Pakistan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparative Effects of Sensorimotor Training and Dual-Task Training on Proprioception, Balance, Functional Mobility and Fall Risk in Stroke Patients

Overview

The aim of this study is to determine the comparative effects of sensorimotor training and dual-task training on propriocetion, balance, functional mobility and fall risk in stroke patients.

Detailed description

Stroke is one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide and commonly results in impaired proprioception, balance deficits, reduced functional mobility, gait disturbances, and increased fall risk, particularly in chronic stroke patients. Stroke survivors often experience decreased sensory-motor integration, impaired postural control, reduced coordination, and difficulty performing dual tasks during daily activities, all of which negatively affect independence and quality of life. Sensorimotor training focuses on improving proprioception, neuromuscular control, balance, and postural stability through sensory and motor integration exercises, whereas dual-task training emphasizes simultaneous performance of motor and cognitive tasks to improve cognitive-motor coordination, gait performance, dynamic balance, and functional mobility. The aim of this study is to determine the comparative effects of sensorimotor training and dual-task training on proprioception, balance, functional mobility, and fall risk in chronic stroke patients. This study will be a randomized clinical trial. A non-probability convenience sampling technique will be used to recruit 54 participants diagnosed with chronic stroke. This study will be conducted at Nishtar Hospital, Multan and District Headquarter Hospital, Rajnapur. Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups through sealed opaque envelope method. Group A will receive sensorimotor training, Group B will receive dual-task training, while Group C will receive conventional physical therapy exercises. All groups will perform their respective exercise protocols for 30 minutes, three times a week for 8 weeks. Participants will be evaluated before and after the intervention through Joint Position Sense Test (JPS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-BESTest, 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) to assess the effects of interventions on proprioception, balance, functional mobility, and fall risk. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26.

Interventions

  • Other Sensorimotor Training
    Somatosensory Training(SMT), for 30 minutes, thrice a week for 8 weeks. Warm-up and cool down will be given.
  • Other Dual-Task Training
    Dual-Task Training, for 30 minutes, thrice a week for 8 weeks. Warm-up and cool down will be given.
  • Other Conventional Physical Therapy
    Conventional Physical Therapy, for 30 minutes, thrice a week for 8 weeks. Warm-up and cool down will be given.

Primary outcome measures

  • Mini-BESTest Scale [Time frame: 8th week]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • 6-minute Walk Test(6MWT) [Time frame: 8th week]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of stroke; ≥6 months after stroke onset
  • Able to walk independently for at least 10 minutes
  • Mini-BESTest score ≤21 indicating balance impairment.
  • MoCA score ≥21 to confirm adequate cognitive function

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., advanced osteoarthritis, recent fractures) that significantly affect mobility or balance.
  • Significant receptive or expressive aphasia
  • Unstable heart or lung conditions preventing exercise.
  • Active psychiatric disorders (e.g., major depression, schizophrenia)
  • Not community-dwelling before the stroke event
  • Involved in similar rehab or studies within the last 3 months

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Pakistan · 1 center
  • DHQ Rajanpur — Rajanpur

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07628374 · REC/RCR & AHS/25/0215

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗