Menu
Recruiting NCT07628270

Insights From the FAST-TRACK CABG Trial: a Clinical Outcome Study in Patient With Previous Surgical Revascularization for Complex Three-vessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiogram, and Fractional Flow Reserve Derived by Computed Tomography

Observational Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Italy
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

FAST-CABG: Insights From the FAST-TRACK CABG Trial: a Clinical Outcome Study in Patient With Previous Surgical Revascularization for Complex Three-vessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiogram, (CCTA) and Fractional Flow Reserve Derived by Computed Tomography (FFRCT)

Overview

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive imaging tool that characterizes coronary artery anatomy and provides detailed assessments of plaque morphology, composition , inflammation, and hemodynamics, which have crucial prognostic implications. The FASTTRACK CABG trial demonstrated that CCTA- fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA can plan and guide coronary artery bypass grafting treatment without traditional invasive coronary angiography and provides a valuable dataset of pre- and post-CABG CCTA for further research. This study is a sub-analysis of the FASTTRACK CABG trial and aims first of all to assess whether these imaging-derived markers can predict symptomatic relief and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing CABG, for complex three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease. Moreover, human coronary lesion studies from subjects with sudden death and carotid endarterectomy specimens demonstrate increasing levels of Lipoprotein(a) with lesion progression, peaking in ruptured plaques. Lp(a) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle comprising an apolipoprotein (apoB-100 molecule covalently linked to apo(a). Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomization studies provide strong evidence for the causal association between elevated Lp(a) levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) risk. Current clinical guidelines, including the 2022 European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) consensus, recommend measuring Lp(a) levels at least once in an adult's lifetime. Circulating Lp(a) levels remain relatively stable over a lifetime, making single measurements cost-effective for risk assessment. Established thresholds for high-risk Lp(a) levels are \>50 mg/dL or 125 nmol/L, as recognized by assays standardized to WHO/International Federation of Clinical Chemistry guidelines. Epidemiological data suggest that Lp(a) \>30 mg/dL increases the risk of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction, while levels \>50 mg/dL elevate the risk of ischemic stroke. Approximately 20-25% of the general population has elevated serum Lp(a) levels. Despite robust evidence linking Lp(a) to ASCVD risk, data correlating Lp(a) levels with coronary artery calcium (CAC) progression remain limited. While Lp(a) and CAC independently predict ASCVD risk, their combined role in guiding prevention strategies is underexplored. Lipoprotein(a)-lowering strategies are currently being investigated in phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes trials. Specifically, the correlation between serum Lp(a) levels and CCTA-derived total calcified plaque volume has yet to be comprehensively studied.

Detailed description

The present study is a observational, prospective, multicenter European study aims to explore in the population of FAST-TRACK CABG the patient-reported outcome measures (by Seattle Angina Questionnaire SAQ) as well as major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events (MACCE) in FAST TRACK CABG population. Patients meeting all inclusion criteria will be asked to sign an informed consent document.

Clinical outcomes will be collected using Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Will be also collected the New York Heart Association (NYHA); MACCE and All-cause death, components of MACCE and cardiovascular hospitalization.

During this visit, the value of Lp (a), which was previously dosed according to the guidelines, will also be recorded

Primary outcome measures

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes assessed by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) [Time frame: May 2026]
  • Major Adverse Cerebral and Cardiovascular Events [Time frame: May 2026]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Correlation of Lipoprotein(a) with Cardiovascular Outcomes in Complex Coronary Artery Disease [Time frame: May 2026]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have analyzable pre-CABG CCTA imaging and received a successful CCTA-guided plus FFRCT CABG procedure.
  • Patient with known level of Lp(a) or with possibility to perform the test
  • Patent able to provide written informed consent as approved by the Ethical Committee

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients without pre-CABG CCTA imaging or those with who did not receive surgical revascularization.
  • Current treatment with lipoprotein apheresis
  • Patients who refuse to receive clinical follow-up
  • Unable to give Informed Consent

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Italy · 1 center
  • Centro Cardiologico Monzino; IRCCS — Milan

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07628270 · L2-347

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗