Impact of Finishing/Polishing Systems on Ormocer VS Methacrylate Based Bulk Fill Flowable Composite in Class V
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: one-step finishing and polishing system., two-step finishing and polishing system., three-step finishing and polishing system..
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Class V Restorations. Basic parameters: 18 years — 35 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Egypt
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Impact of Finishing/Polishing Systems on Ormocer Versus Methacrylate Based Bulk Fill Flowable Composite in Class V Restorations: Clinical Study and Laboratory Investigations
Overview
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare. Impact of finishing/polishing systems on ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations: The main question it aims to answer is the following: Are there any differences between finishing/polishing systems on Ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite?
Detailed description
This study will evaluate the impact of three different finishing/polishing systems on ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations on adult patients' anterior teeth. First, investigators will use an ormocer and methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations in anterior teeth. Then each patient will receive three different finishing/polishing systems. Investigators will follow patients at 2 weeks, 6 months, 18 months, and 24 months to assess the restorations according to the FDI criteria as esthetic properties (A1 surface luster and surface texture; A2 marginal staining; A3 color match), functional (F1 fracture/retention; F2 marginal adaptation), and biological (B1 caries at restoration margin). The results will help dentists choose the most appropriate finishing/polishing systems for Class V restoration cases.
Interventions
- Other one-step finishing and polishing system.
• Each class V restoration will be restored with an ormocer-based bulk-fill flowable composite material or methacrylate-based restorative according to the manufacturer's instructions for use, and then each class V restoration will be subjected to a one-step finishing and polishing system. - Other two-step finishing and polishing system.
Each class V restoration will be restored with an ormocer-based bulk-fill flowable composite material or methacrylate-based restorative according to the manufacturer's instructions for use, and then each class V restoration will be subjected to a two-step finishing and polishing system. - Other three-step finishing and polishing system.
Each Class V restoration will be restored with an ormocer-based bulk-fill flowable composite material or methacrylate-based restorative according to the manufacturer's instructions for use, and then each Class V restoration will be subjected to a three-step finishing and polishing system.
Primary outcome measures
- FDI criteria score-aesthetic properties (A1 surface luster and surface texture; A2 Marginal staining; A3 color match), Functional (F1 Fracture/Retention; F2 marginal adaptation), biological (B1 caries at restoration margin) [Time frame: Post-restoration baseline (2 weeks), 6, 12, 18, and 24 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Three pairs of buccal cervical supragingival carious lesions in anterior teeth
- Complete and normal occlusion
- Good oral hygiene
- Willingness to attend follow-up and recall visits for 2 years
Exclusion criteria
- Teeth requiring direct pulp capping
- Poor oral hygiene or failure to complete the oral hygiene phase
- Chronic periodontitis
- Pulpitis or non-vital teeth
- Current orthodontic treatment
- Presence of parafunctional habits
- Systemic diseases
- Previous or ongoing bleaching procedures
- Smoking patients
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Egypt · 1 center
- Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University — Al Mansurah
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07627295 · MD250825