Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07620535

Decision Counseling and Follow-up for Shield+ Patients

Observational Colo-rectal Cancer

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Decision Counseling Session.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Colo-rectal Cancer. Basic parameters: 45 years — 75 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Decision Counseling and Follow-up (DCaF) for Shield+ Patients

Overview

Prospective, observational, minimal-risk study evaluating decision-making, decisional conflict, intention to undergo complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE), and colonoscopy completion after a positive Shield TM blood-based colorectal cancer screening test result.

Detailed description

The DCaF study uses a prospective, observational design to characterize how patients make decisions following a Shield(+) screening result and to assess real-world adherence to recommended diagnostic colonoscopy. Because the intervention of interest is the patient's naturally occurring decision-making process-not the performance of the test itself-a non-interventional design is methodologically appropriate and minimizes participant burden. Incorporating decision counseling allows systematic evaluation of changes in preference, decisional conflict, and intention, while linkage to real-world evidence (RWE) claims data provides an efficient and objective method for determining colonoscopy completion. This approach enables the study to identify behavioral, clinical, and system-level factors associated with follow-up adherence without altering standard clinical care.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Decision Counseling Session
    During the decision counseling session, JH research staff will review the Complete Diagnostic Evaluation (CDE) infographic and use an online survey to guide the participant through a telephone encounter that involves the identification of patient goals that are likely to affect their decision to have CDE and not to have CDE.

Primary outcome measures

  • CDE Decisional Conflict [Time frame: From Enrollment to the end of study at 6 months]
  • Factors for CDE Decisional Conflict [Time frame: From Enrollment to End of Study at 6 months]
  • Factors for Changes in CDE Decisional Conflict [Time frame: From Enrollment to End of Study at 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant is 45-75 years old at the time of ShieldTM test order.
  • Participant has a valid Shield(+) test result.
  • Participant is willing and able to complete the informed consent process
  • Participant is able to complete the informed consent process and decision counseling session in English

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant is already enrolled in another Guardant Health, Inc. clinical study or has received a positive MCD result for a cancer type other than CRC.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Jefferson Center — Philadelphia

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07620535 · 07-GI-008

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗