Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07617571

Bone Metabolism in Patients Treated With 3d Printed Aligners Versus Thermoformed Aligners

No phase Interventional Bone Metabolism Orthodontic Aligners

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Directly printed aligners using Tera Harz TA28 resin, PETG thermoplastic sheets.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Bone Metabolism, Orthodontic Aligners. Basic parameters: 18 years — 25 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Bone Metabolism in Patients Treated With 3d Printed Aligners Versus Thermoformed Aligners (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Overview

Background: Orthodontic forces induce tissue reactions by triggering perturbations from orthodontic appliances, which lead to the modelling and remodelling of alveolar bone. Despite the growing popularity of 3D-printed aligners, no studies have compared their effects on bone metabolism in comparison with thermoformed aligners. Aim: This study aims to assess bone metabolism in patients undergoing treatment with 3D-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners.

Interventions

  • Other Directly printed aligners using Tera Harz TA28 resin
    Aligners will be digitally designed using the latest version of ArchForm software for segmentation of dental arches, virtual tooth movement planning and generation of sequential treatment stages, the finalized setups will be exported as STL files.
  • Other PETG thermoplastic sheets
    Aligners were digitally designed using the latest version of ArchForm software .The 3D-printed resin models which were used as a mold for aligner thermoforming, were fabricated by Anycubic Photon Mono M5s (12K resolution) (Anycubic, China) 3D printing machine.

Primary outcome measures

  • change in levels of Osteoprotegerin (OPG) [Time frame: up to 21 days]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • change in gingival inflammation [Time frame: up to 21 days]
  • change in plaque accumulation [Time frame: up to 21 days]
  • change in bleeding on probing [Time frame: up to 21 days]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Minor malocclusion (2 to 4 mm of crowding) .
  • Patients in need for Antero-posterior expansion and labial tipping of incisors without interproximal reduction
  • No use of anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotics in the past 6 months.
  • Periodontal parameters of gingival index <1 and no pocketing with a generalized pocketing depth of <3mm.
  • Radiographic parameters of no crestal bone loss.
  • No history of smoking.

Exclusion criteria

  • Signs of inflammation of the gingiva, and periodontitis.
  • Systemic conditions (kidney disease, HIV, and liver disease).
  • Teeth missing or poor oral hygiene.
  • Bone disease e.g.; osteoporosis.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University — Alexandria

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07617571 · 1070-05/2025

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗